What's Hot

    Gilbert Owner Shifts to Residential Plan for Underperforming Infill Site

    May 8, 2026

    WinCo Planned as 19th Ave & Baseline Retail Anchor

    May 8, 2026

    New National Data Hints at Possible Multifamily Momentum Pickup

    May 8, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [May 8, 2026] - Gilbert Owner Shifts to Residential Plan for Underperforming Infill Site
    • [May 8, 2026] - WinCo Planned as 19th Ave & Baseline Retail Anchor
    • [May 8, 2026] - New National Data Hints at Possible Multifamily Momentum Pickup
    • [May 8, 2026] - Arizona Projects 05-08-26
    • [May 6, 2026] - Tucson Planning to Review Updated Data Center Restriction Plan
    • [May 5, 2026] - Ariz. Construction Added 300 Jobs in March
    • [May 5, 2026] - Carefree Partnering with SimonCRE on Revised Development
    • [May 5, 2026] - Lower Basin States Agree to Short-Term Colorado River Cuts
    LinkedIn Facebook
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. ✎ Planning & Development
      3. 📰 Local News
      4. 🔎︎ Classifieds
      5. 🕵 Editorial Analysis
      6. 💰 Budgets & Funding
      7. 🏢 Commercial Real Estate
      8. 👔 People on the Move
      9. 🌵 Arizona Projects
      10. 🏛️ Legislation & Regulations
      11. 📈 Trends

      Gilbert Owner Shifts to Residential Plan for Underperforming Infill Site

      May 8, 2026

      WinCo Planned as 19th Ave & Baseline Retail Anchor

      May 8, 2026

      Carefree Partnering with SimonCRE on Revised Development

      May 5, 2026

      400KSF of New Hangar Space Planned at Phoenix Goodyear Airport

      April 29, 2026

      Tucson Planning to Review Updated Data Center Restriction Plan

      May 6, 2026

      New Scottsdale Airport Parking Project Raises Questions

      May 1, 2026

      AI Yields Benefits and Risks in Planning and Zoning

      April 28, 2026

      Coolidge to Start Planning for Water Treatment Plant Expansion

      April 24, 2026

      Affordability Reform Legislation May Gut BTR Sector

      April 28, 2026

      Developers Must Work Differently to Counter Intensifying Project Opposition

      January 6, 2026

      Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request

      July 29, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Proposed State Budget to Cut Economic Development Programs in Favor of Tax Cuts

      May 1, 2026

      Mesa City Council Approves $61M GO Bond Sale

      April 10, 2026

      Gilbert Schools Considering $136M Bond Request

      March 31, 2026

      Ruling Give 8 Months, No Guidance, For State to Fix School Funding

      March 10, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 05-05-26

      May 5, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 04-28-26

      April 28, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 04-21-26

      April 22, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 04-14-26

      April 14, 2026

      Industry Professionals 05-05-26

      May 5, 2026

      Industry Professionals 04-28-26

      April 28, 2026

      Industry Professionals 04-21-26

      April 22, 2026

      Industry Professionals 04-14-26

      April 14, 2026

      Arizona Projects 05-08-26

      May 8, 2026

      Arizona Projects 05-01-26

      May 1, 2026

      Arizona Projects 04-24-26

      April 24, 2026

      Arizona Projects 04-17-26

      April 17, 2026

      Affordability Reform Legislation May Gut BTR Sector

      April 28, 2026

      Judge Finds ADWR Groundwater Policy Actions Illegal

      April 24, 2026

      Flagstaff Considering Imposing Data Center Restrictions

      March 27, 2026

      Cities May Have to Pay for Data Center Zoning Restrictions Under State Law

      March 27, 2026

      New National Data Hints at Possible Multifamily Momentum Pickup

      May 8, 2026

      Ariz. Construction Added 2,900 Jobs in February

      April 22, 2026

      Home Builder Sentiment Dips in April

      April 22, 2026

      Data Centers Fuel Backlog Increase; Confidence Remains High

      April 17, 2026

      Gilbert Owner Shifts to Residential Plan for Underperforming Infill Site

      May 8, 2026

      WinCo Planned as 19th Ave & Baseline Retail Anchor

      May 8, 2026

      New National Data Hints at Possible Multifamily Momentum Pickup

      May 8, 2026

      Arizona Projects 05-08-26

      May 8, 2026
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Solicitations
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • DATABEX Log-In
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2026 Mid-Year Update
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    • CIP Special Report
    AZBEX
    Home»Planning & Development»Experts Weigh in on Construction Costs
    Planning & Development

    Experts Weigh in on Construction Costs

    Roland MurphyBy Roland MurphyJune 10, 2022No Comments8 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    A foursome of experts from across the industry shared their thoughts and experiences on the current state of construction costs at the June BEX Companies Leading Market Series discussion this week.

    Moderated remotely by BEX President and Founder Rebekah Morris, the in-person panel consisted of:

    • Julian Anderson, president of Rider Levett Bucknall
    • Chad Halmrast, director of preconstruction for TDI Industries;
    • R.J. Radobenko, president of Global Roofing Southwest; and
    • Blake Wells, VP of construction for LGE Design Build.

    After presenting her standard market history overview, Morris gave the audience and panel a snapshot into the increase in entitlement and permitting lead times. For the one Valley city shown as an example, the process has gone from an average of four months before 2018 to 14 months today, a total increase of 180% since the pre-pandemic era.

    The increase in timelines from submittal to permitting is significant because fluctuations in materials costs and availability vary wildly in the current market due to ongoing supply chain issues. The longer the process draws out, the less reliable cost and availability forecasting becomes.

    Following her introduction, Morris turned to RLB’s Anderson for an overview of how Arizona construction costs have changed since January of 2020. He began by saying, “I think one of the things that people miss when they look at raw numbers… is that those are raw numbers. They’re today’s dollars compared with yesterday’s dollars.” He added this is an issue analysts have to consider. “What’s the correct inflator or deflator to use so we understand what the real volume is? Just because a number has doubled over 10 years or 20 years doesn’t mean the amount of work has doubled if costs have gone up 70%, for example.”

    He then turned to looking at commodities like copper, lumber and oil as influencing factors in those cost increases. He pointed out the wild fluctuations make it difficult for the construction and development industries to estimate where any pricing will be at any particular time.

    After introducing the concept, Anderson presented a slide showing RLB’s Phoenix bid price indexing over the last 20 years. Construction costs in the last 20 years have generally continued to increase, except for a slight dip from 2008-2010. “They just go up,” he said. “That’s what happens with construction costs.”

    The slide, however, included an overlay showing the change in construction costs. Anderson pointed out and explained the more dramatic peaks and valleys in the chart – including the housing bust and the industry’s post-pandemic lockdown resurgence before turning to the most recent data.

    “What we’re seeing in the last quarter is construction costs, as bid, have risen in the last quarter at an annualized rate of almost 9%,” he said. “What that tells me is that even though we have construction costs going up in terms of materials and other things, the bid prices are still being suppressed. When I say, ‘suppressed,’ people along the line are trying very hard not to pass on as much as they think they should be able to pass on. Pretty typical in a hot market like this.”

    Turning to the other panelists, Morris asked them to summarize what they see as major cost increases in the current market. Wells said it largely depended on the project type. Industrial projects, he said, are getting hit particularly hard at the moment due to the high rate of demand and the supply pressures that puts on specific materials and inputs for those projects.

    Radobenko said the key issue for his roofing and metal work is, “Today, we don’t know the price for anything that’s being delivered tomorrow. Everything is being priced on delivery. It’s hard for construction customers because we’re getting contracts farther out now and we have a longer lead time. Materials we order today, we get in six-to-eight months on the west coast. When you get east of Texas, it’s 12-to-18 months.”

    He continued, “It’s really difficult to estimate. I have a lot of ‘I don’t knows.’ We price at today’s prices, and we just don’t know what going to happen in the near future.” He added another factor complicating business at the moment is warranty satisfaction. Given that warranties in roofing work can cover between 10 and 30 years, the ever-shifting ability to procure materials for warranty work makes both price estimating and work scheduling an ongoing challenge.

    Morris next asked the panel to discuss and compare labor costs versus materials and other factors as a driver in increases. Halmrast said, “Looking at the impacts of labor versus material and equipment, I would say that materials and equipment are the biggest impact we have on costs right now. Yes, there is a war for labor and there are a lot of carrots being dangled right now, and there are a lot of ‘chasers’, but there are some that aren’t. I would say that of the total increase, about 30% is due to labor and the rest is materials and equipment.”

    Radobenko echoed that finding and said his company had increased wages 20% across the board and only increased its labor pool by 2% because of the hyper-competitive market for talent.

    Anderson explained labor and materials, while vital, are not the entirety of construction costs. “Below the line” items at the contractor and subcontractor levels – such as overhead and profit, contingency allowances, insurances, taxes, bonds, etc. – make up roughly 30% of costs. “That’s where some of the ‘squish’ is, where people are able to keep costs down by trying to reduce their overhead and profit and other things and causing some stress at some levels of the industry. It’s a real problem… especially when people were setting project budgets in 2018 or 2019 and had an expectation that that nice little flat spot of 3% or 4% increase was going to go on forever and then it didn’t.”

    Regarding labor expenditures, Halmrast said there will always be “carrot chasers” who jump from one employer to the next in search of wage increases, particularly in the current market. He said TDI has found success in building relationships with employees who are more focused on finding a right fit culturally with the company and who consider their employment to be a long-term relationship of mutual value.

    Radobenko said his company was compelled to raise wages across the board and used the need as an opportunity to reward and promote key employees to new titles and responsibilities to increase their investment in and attachment to the company.

    Wells said LGE was compelled to increase compensation for both field and office-based staff because projects keep getting bigger and the need to attract and retain talent only increases.

    In terms of attracting talent, Halmrast and Radobenko again reiterated the need to focus on culture, long-term employee/company relationships and other job satisfaction components in addition to financial compensation.

    Moving the event toward its conclusion, Morris elicited chuckles from the panelists and the audience when she posed a question asking how much can we rely on predictions.

    Anderson said the best guess is a minimum of 10% annualized rate increases until inflation gets under control. Wells demurred and said LGE’s predictions from January and February were irrelevant by May.

    Later, Wells noted rent increases, particularly in industrial, have helped to absorb some of the cost increases, but that deal structures across the board are becoming more complicated. He said contracts are becoming more complicated to negotiate and that contingencies and pre-orders are much more important than ever before.

    Radobenko and Halmrest said margins are down and continuing to fade, even though overall revenues are increasing due to costs.

    Another chuckle came when Morris posed her closing question to Anderson to wrap up the event: What do you think it would take to pull construction pricing back in?

    Anderson replied simply, “You don’t pull construction costs back in… What happens is the industry does one of two things: It grows or it slows, and if it slows the question is: How much does it slow” He added the two key influencers on how much slowing might take place are consumer confidence levels and the effectiveness and timing of Federal Reserve efforts to stabilize the economy.

    “If that slows the economy and the industry, many of our supply chain issues will ameliorate and we’ll go back to something ‘normal,’ although we don’t seem, as an industry, to ever do anything normal. We either accelerate too fast or decelerate too quickly. It’s a question in my mind as to whether this next downturn is a moderate one or something different. We don’t, however, hold back costs.”

    Credit: Butler Design Group/BEX Companies
    BEX Companies Leading Market Series Blake Wells Chad Halmrast commodities Construction costs copper cost suppression entitlement process equipment costs federal reserve Global Roofing Southwest inflation Julian Anderson labor shortage lead times Leading Market Series LGE Design Build LMS lumber materials costs materials inputs materials prices monetary policy petroleum profit margins R.J. Radobenko Rider Levett Bucknall TDI Industries trends
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Gilbert Owner Shifts to Residential Plan for Underperforming Infill Site

    May 8, 2026

    WinCo Planned as 19th Ave & Baseline Retail Anchor

    May 8, 2026

    New National Data Hints at Possible Multifamily Momentum Pickup

    May 8, 2026

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Our Picks

    Gilbert Owner Shifts to Residential Plan for Underperforming Infill Site

    May 8, 2026

    WinCo Planned as 19th Ave & Baseline Retail Anchor

    May 8, 2026

    New National Data Hints at Possible Multifamily Momentum Pickup

    May 8, 2026

    Arizona Projects 05-08-26

    May 8, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Planning & Development

    Gilbert Owner Shifts to Residential Plan for Underperforming Infill Site

    May 8, 20260

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX Orsett Properties, developer of the Reserve at San Tan campus…

    WinCo Planned as 19th Ave & Baseline Retail Anchor

    May 8, 2026

    New National Data Hints at Possible Multifamily Momentum Pickup

    May 8, 2026

    Arizona Projects 05-08-26

    May 8, 2026

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Gilbert Owner Shifts to Residential Plan for Underperforming Infill Site

    May 8, 2026

    WinCo Planned as 19th Ave & Baseline Retail Anchor

    May 8, 2026

    New National Data Hints at Possible Multifamily Momentum Pickup

    May 8, 2026
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.