What's Hot

    Planning Advances for N. Scottsdale Auto Country Club

    June 3, 2026

    Multifamily ‘Rebalancing’ Nationally; Phoenix Pipeline Remains Heavy

    June 2, 2026

    68-Unit Townhomes Planned in Lake Havasu City

    June 2, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [June 3, 2026] - Planning Advances for N. Scottsdale Auto Country Club
    • [June 2, 2026] - Multifamily ‘Rebalancing’ Nationally; Phoenix Pipeline Remains Heavy
    • [June 2, 2026] - 68-Unit Townhomes Planned in Lake Havasu City
    • [June 2, 2026] - HUD Amends Multifamily Environmental Review Process
    • [June 2, 2026] - Industry Professionals 06-02-26
    • [June 2, 2026] - Commercial Real Estate 06-02-26
    • [May 29, 2026] - Surprise Council Approves Rezone for Church Campus
    • [May 29, 2026] - Dirty Data Does a Disservice to AI  
    LinkedIn Facebook
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. ✎ Planning & Development
      3. 📰 Local News
      4. 🔎︎ Classifieds
      5. 🕵 Editorial Analysis
      6. 💰 Budgets & Funding
      7. 🏢 Commercial Real Estate
      8. 👔 People on the Move
      9. 🌵 Arizona Projects
      10. 🏛️ Legislation & Regulations
      11. 📈 Trends

      Planning Advances for N. Scottsdale Auto Country Club

      June 3, 2026

      68-Unit Townhomes Planned in Lake Havasu City

      June 2, 2026

      Kingman Council Approves Master Plan Commercial Requests

      May 29, 2026

      Cottonwood P&Z Advances 252-Unit Apartment Plan

      May 26, 2026

      Dirty Data Does a Disservice to AI  

      May 29, 2026

      Ariz. Construction Down 800 Jobs in April, 3,100 Year-over-Year

      May 26, 2026

      Bullhead Council Hears Vision for Laughlin Ranch

      May 15, 2026

      Tucson Planning to Review Updated Data Center Restriction Plan

      May 6, 2026

      Affordability Reform Legislation May Gut BTR Sector

      April 28, 2026

      Developers Must Work Differently to Counter Intensifying Project Opposition

      January 6, 2026

      Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request

      July 29, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Gilbert Approves $1.7B 10-Year CIP

      May 26, 2026

      Mesa Proposing $285M GO Bond for Safety and Transportation Improvements

      May 23, 2026

      Lake Havasu City Considering Major Expenditures for Water Projects

      May 19, 2026

      Chandler Budget Plan Includes $474M in New Capital Projects

      May 12, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 06-02-26

      June 2, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 05-26-26

      May 26, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 05-19-26

      May 19, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 05-12-26

      May 13, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-02-26

      June 2, 2026

      Industry Professionals 05-26-26

      May 26, 2026

      Industry Professionals 05-19-26

      May 19, 2026

      Industry Professionals 05-12-26

      May 12, 2026

      Arizona Projects 05-29-26

      May 29, 2026

      Arizona Projects 05-22-26

      May 23, 2026

      Arizona Projects 05-15-26

      May 15, 2026

      Arizona Projects 05-08-26

      May 8, 2026

      Judge Rules for Axon in Latest NIMBY Decision

      May 19, 2026

      Affordability Reform Legislation May Gut BTR Sector

      April 28, 2026

      Judge Finds ADWR Groundwater Policy Actions Illegal

      April 24, 2026

      Flagstaff Considering Imposing Data Center Restrictions

      March 27, 2026

      Multifamily ‘Rebalancing’ Nationally; Phoenix Pipeline Remains Heavy

      June 2, 2026

      Dirty Data Does a Disservice to AI  

      May 29, 2026

      Ariz. Construction Down 800 Jobs in April, 3,100 Year-over-Year

      May 26, 2026

      March U.S. Construction Unemployment Hit 6.7%

      May 23, 2026

      Planning Advances for N. Scottsdale Auto Country Club

      June 3, 2026

      Multifamily ‘Rebalancing’ Nationally; Phoenix Pipeline Remains Heavy

      June 2, 2026

      68-Unit Townhomes Planned in Lake Havasu City

      June 2, 2026

      HUD Amends Multifamily Environmental Review Process

      June 2, 2026
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Solicitations
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • DATABEX Log-In
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2026 Mid-Year Update
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    • CIP Special Report
    AZBEX
    Home»Trends»June Unemployment Rates Down in 40 States
    Trends

    June Unemployment Rates Down in 40 States

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffAugust 2, 2019No Comments6 Mins Read
    Courtesy of Associates Builders and Contractors
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Source: Associated Builders and Contractors

    In June, estimated not seasonally adjusted construction unemployment rates fell nationally and in 40 states and increased in 10 on a year-over-year basis, according to an analysis of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data released by Associated Builders and Contractors. For the second month in a row, all 50 states posted construction unemployment rates of less than 10 percent.

    The construction industry employed 200,000 more workers nationally compared to June 2018, dropping the June 2019 national NSA construction unemployment rate 0.7 percent, from 4.7 percent to 4 percent, according to BLS numbers.

    “While severe weather, particularly in the Midwest and parts of the East, disrupted construction activity to some extent, the June construction employment numbers remained strong,” said Bernard M. Markstein, Ph.D., president and chief economist of Markstein Advisors, who conducted the analysis for ABC. “Construction employment opportunities continue to grow for job seekers, with skilled workers particularly in high demand. June seasonally adjusted average hourly earnings in construction increased by 3.2 percent on a year-over-year basis. At $30.73, average hourly earnings for construction are 10 percent higher than average hourly earnings for all private-sector employees.”

    Because these industry-specific rates are not seasonally adjusted, national and state-level unemployment rates are best evaluated on a year-over-year basis. The monthly movement of rates still provides some information, although extra care must be used when drawing conclusions from these variations.

    The national NSA construction unemployment rate rose 0.8 percent from May to June. This was only the second time that the June rate increased from May since the data series began in 2000—the first time was June of last year. (In June 2010 it was unchanged.) Only three states (Alaska, Kansas and South Carolina) posted lower estimated construction unemployment rates from May; two (New Jersey and New York) were unchanged; the remaining 45 increased.

    The Top Five States

    The states with the lowest estimated NSA construction unemployment rates in order from lowest to highest were:

    1. Vermont, 1 percent
    2. South Dakota, 1.1 percent
    3. North Dakota, 1.5 percent
    4. Maine, 1.6 percent
    5. Idaho, 2 percent

    All of these states except for Idaho were in the top five in May. Vermont had the lowest construction unemployment rate in June, an improvement from tied with Maine for second lowest rate in May based on revised data (originally reported as the lowest rate). This was the state’s lowest June rate on record.

    South Dakota had the second lowest rate in June, down from lowest in May based on revised data (originally reported as second lowest). This was the state’s lowest June rate (matching its June 2017 rate) since the 2007 rate of 1 percent.

    North Dakota had the third lowest rate in June, compared to fourth lowest in May based on revised data (originally reported as 15th lowest).

    Maine had the fourth lowest rate in June, down from tied with Vermont for the second lowest rate in May based on revised data (originally reported as sixth lowest). This was the state’s lowest June rate on record.

    Idaho had the fifth lowest rate in June, up from ninth lowest in May.

    Iowa, which was tied with Minnesota for the fifth lowest rate in May based on revised data (originally reported as third lowest), fell to 10th lowest in June with a 2.5 percent rate. Nevertheless, it was Iowa’s lowest June rate since the 2.2 percent rate in June 2000, making it the second lowest rate on record.

    Minnesota fell to 17th lowest in June with a 3.2 percent rate, tied with New Jersey. In May, Minnesota was tied with Iowa for fifth lowest based on revised data (originally reported as eighth lowest). For New Jersey, this was its lowest June rate on record. The state also had the largest year-over-year decrease in its rate, down 2.7 percent.

    Two states, Montana and Wyoming, that were originally reported as tied for fourth lowest construction unemployment rate in May fell out of that designation due to data revisions. Montana tied with Texas for the 15th lowest rate in June with a 3.1 percent rate. Revised data show that Montana was tied with Wisconsin for seventh lowest rate in May. This was Montana’s lowest June rate since the 2.3 percent rate in June 2007.

    Wyoming tied with New Hampshire for eighth lowest in June, with a 2.4 percent rate. Revised data show that Wyoming tied with Utah for 10th lowest rate in May. This was the state’s lowest June rate, matching its June 2014 rate, since the 1.6 percent rate in June 2013.

    Montana and Wyoming had the second and third largest decline in its year-over-year rate, down 2.6 percent and 2.1 percent, respectively. (Wyoming’s 2.1 percent year-over-year drop was shared with Alabama.)

    The Bottom Five States

    The states with the highest estimated NSA construction unemployment rates in order from lowest to highest were:

    1. Connecticut and Louisiana (tie), 6.2 percent
    2. Missouri, 6.4 percent
    3. New Mexico, 7.3 percent
    4. Kentucky, 8.4 percent
    5. Mississippi, 8.6 percent

    Four of these states were also in the bottom five in May: Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri and New Mexico. Mississippi had the highest estimated construction unemployment rate for the second month in a row. This was Mississippi’s second lowest June rate after the 8.2 percent rate in 2017 since the 8.1 percent rate in June 2001.

    Kentucky had the second highest rate in June compared to third highest in May based on revised data (originally reported as fourth highest).

    New Mexico had the third highest rate in June compared to fifth highest in May. This was the state’s second lowest June rate after the 7.2 percent rate in 2017 since the five percent rate in June 2008.

    Missouri had the fourth highest rate in June, the same as in May based on revised data (originally reported as third highest).

    Connecticut and Louisiana tied for the fifth highest rate in June. For Connecticut, this compared to sixth highest in May. The June rate was the Connecticut’s second lowest June estimated construction unemployment rate behind the 5.5 percent rate in 2017 since the 4.6 percent rate in June 2001. For Louisiana, this compared to 14th highest in May.

    Alaska, which tied with Mississippi for the highest rate in May, improved dramatically to 12th highest in June (tied with Pennsylvania) with a 5.3 percent rate, ending its three-month run as the state with the highest construction unemployment rate. This was the state’s lowest June rate since the 4.4 percent rate in June 2002. Alaska had the largest drop among the states in its rate from May, down 1.3 percent.

    Associated Builders and Contractors construction unemployment Not Seasonally Adjusted U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Multifamily ‘Rebalancing’ Nationally; Phoenix Pipeline Remains Heavy

    June 2, 2026

    Dirty Data Does a Disservice to AI  

    May 29, 2026

    Ariz. Construction Down 800 Jobs in April, 3,100 Year-over-Year

    May 26, 2026

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Our Picks

    Planning Advances for N. Scottsdale Auto Country Club

    June 3, 2026

    Multifamily ‘Rebalancing’ Nationally; Phoenix Pipeline Remains Heavy

    June 2, 2026

    68-Unit Townhomes Planned in Lake Havasu City

    June 2, 2026

    HUD Amends Multifamily Environmental Review Process

    June 2, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Planning & Development

    Planning Advances for N. Scottsdale Auto Country Club

    June 3, 20260

    By BEX Staff for AZBEX Plans are advancing for Finish Line Auto Club’s car-centric self-storage…

    Multifamily ‘Rebalancing’ Nationally; Phoenix Pipeline Remains Heavy

    June 2, 2026

    68-Unit Townhomes Planned in Lake Havasu City

    June 2, 2026

    HUD Amends Multifamily Environmental Review Process

    June 2, 2026

    Through AZBEX (Arizona Builder's Exchange), NVBEX, DATABEX and BEX Events, BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms in Arizona and Nevada, as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturers' representatives, public agencies, private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and service providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Planning Advances for N. Scottsdale Auto Country Club

    June 3, 2026

    Multifamily ‘Rebalancing’ Nationally; Phoenix Pipeline Remains Heavy

    June 2, 2026

    68-Unit Townhomes Planned in Lake Havasu City

    June 2, 2026
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.