What's Hot

    4 Newly Installed Leaders Share Views on Their Roles, Goals and Challenges

    March 6, 2026

    Buckeye Considering Annexation for ViaWest Project at I-10 and SR 85

    March 6, 2026

    January Construction Prices Up and Year-over-Year

    March 6, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [March 6, 2026] - 4 Newly Installed Leaders Share Views on Their Roles, Goals and Challenges
    • [March 6, 2026] - Buckeye Considering Annexation for ViaWest Project at I-10 and SR 85
    • [March 6, 2026] - January Construction Prices Up and Year-over-Year
    • [March 6, 2026] - Arizona Projects 03-06-26
    • [March 3, 2026] - Data Center Changes Result in Plan Change to Mixed-Use
    • [March 3, 2026] - Mesa’s Planned ‘Downtown Refresh’ Includes ASU Projects and Light Walk
    • [March 3, 2026] - Appeals Court Strikes Down Arizona Cities Prevailing Wage Law
    • [March 3, 2026] - Industry Professionals 03-03-26
    LinkedIn Facebook
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. ✎ Planning & Development
      3. 📰 Local News
      4. 🔎︎ Classifieds
      5. 🕵 Editorial Analysis
      6. 💰 Budgets & Funding
      7. 🏢 Commercial Real Estate
      8. 👔 People on the Move
      9. 🌵 Arizona Projects
      10. 🏛️ Legislation & Regulations
      11. 📈 Trends

      Data Center Changes Result in Plan Change to Mixed-Use

      March 3, 2026

      Mesa’s Planned ‘Downtown Refresh’ Includes ASU Projects and Light Walk

      March 3, 2026

      Opposition Group Drops Plans for Data Center Referendum in Marana

      February 25, 2026

      57-Unit Special Needs Housing Development Planned in Glendale

      February 24, 2026

      4 Newly Installed Leaders Share Views on Their Roles, Goals and Challenges

      March 6, 2026

      Buckeye Considering Annexation for ViaWest Project at I-10 and SR 85

      March 6, 2026

      Appeals Court Strikes Down Arizona Cities Prevailing Wage Law

      March 3, 2026

      Phoenix Construction Costs Still Elevated as Activity Largely Normalizes

      February 27, 2026

      Developers Must Work Differently to Counter Intensifying Project Opposition

      January 6, 2026

      Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request

      July 29, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Legislation Would Effectively Strip NIMBYs of Referendum Tool

      February 11, 2025

      Gilbert Considering Other Methods to Fund Transportation Projects

      January 6, 2026

      Public School Bonds Split at the Ballot

      November 7, 2025

      Early voting for Coconino Community College bond begins this week

      October 7, 2025

      Yuma Funding CIP Projects with $116M Bond Issuance

      September 24, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 03-03-26

      March 3, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 02-24-26

      February 24, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 02-17-26

      February 17, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 02-10-26

      February 10, 2026

      Industry Professionals 03-03-26

      March 3, 2026

      Industry Professionals 02-24-26

      February 24, 2026

      Industry Professionals 02-03-26

      February 3, 2026

      Industry Professionals 01-27-26

      January 27, 2026

      Arizona Projects 03-06-26

      March 6, 2026

      Arizona Projects 02-27-26

      February 27, 2026

      Arizona Projects 02-20-26

      February 20, 2026

      Arizona Projects 02-13-26

      February 13, 2026

      Appeals Court Strikes Down Arizona Cities Prevailing Wage Law

      March 3, 2026

      AG Appeals Project Blue Energy Agreement Approval

      February 24, 2026

      Proposed Bill Would Exempt Historic Neighborhoods from Housing Law

      February 17, 2026

      Arizona C-PACE Program Proposed

      February 6, 2026

      January Construction Prices Up and Year-over-Year

      March 6, 2026

      Phoenix Construction Costs Still Elevated as Activity Largely Normalizes

      February 27, 2026

      A Quick Look at Multifamily Announcements vs Activity

      February 20, 2026

      AI Fears Cause for Major CRE Stock Selloff

      February 20, 2026

      4 Newly Installed Leaders Share Views on Their Roles, Goals and Challenges

      March 6, 2026

      Buckeye Considering Annexation for ViaWest Project at I-10 and SR 85

      March 6, 2026

      January Construction Prices Up and Year-over-Year

      March 6, 2026

      Arizona Projects 03-06-26

      March 6, 2026
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Solicitations
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • DATABEX Log-In
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2026 New Titles Leadership Panel LMS
      • 2026 Construction Activity Forecast
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    • CIP Special Report
    AZBEX
    Home»Legislation & Regulations»Company Claims Glendale Contract Rule Violation
    Legislation & Regulations

    Company Claims Glendale Contract Rule Violation

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffMarch 20, 2024No Comments4 Mins Read
    Credit: City of Glendale
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Rare Earth LLC has filed a lawsuit against the City of Glendale claiming the City violated its procurement rules when it awarded a bid to purchase a City-owned site by the Agua Fria River to a competing firm.

    Rare Earth, a Glendale-based mining and gravel company, alleges in a Maricopa County Superior Court complaint filed in November that Glendale set up its solicitation process to favor M.R. Tanner Construction’s bid for the 48-acre property between Glendale Avenue and Bethany Home Road over its submission.

    It also claims the terms of the contract between Tanner and Glendale do not follow those laid out in the bid request. Rare Earth is asking the Court to compel Glendale to perform the solicitation again.

    Glendale denies favoring Tanner and says both companies were given equal opportunities in the bidding process. The City has asked the Court to dismiss the claim and says it adhered to the local code.

    Tanner submitted a separate filing and noted Rare Earth’s offer was $2M, while Tanner’s was $4.75M.

    A key question comes down to whether both companies were held to the same rules and standards. Specifically, part of Glendale’s requirements was that the winning company fill in a hole and build berms at the location within a 90-day window.

    In its submission, Tanner claimed the timeline was unreasonable. The City later stipulated in its sale and purchase agreement that a 240-day extension was possible.

    Rare Earth claims it was not aware an extension was an option and that its bid was low because executing the required work within the 90-day timeline was an expensive undertaking.

    Glendale says Rare Earth had the same opportunities as Tanner to express any concerns about terms and timelines.

    Rare Earth and its affiliate company ABC Sand and Rock had approached the City in 2019 about entering into a mineral lease, the lawsuit claims. Glendale declined the offer because the site was connected to the City’s groundwater recharge.

    The company made another request in 2020 for portions of the site not connected to the aquifer recharge and was again rejected.

    Tanner approached the City about buying the property in 2021. Rather than accept Tanner’s unsolicited offer, Glendale says it issued the invitation to bid. The City says Rare Earth’s earlier attempts to buy the property did not entitle it to preferential treatment.

    In August 2022, Glendale issued an invitation for bids for City-owned parcels. The solicitation included a requirement to fill in an 850-foot by 400-foot hole, bring it level with Glendale Avenue and build berms around the property.

    Glendale opened the bids in September 2022 and announced its intent to award the sale to Tanner two months later. Between January and April of 2023, Rare Earth’s lawyers contacted Glendale several times to ask about the status of the contract with Tanner. The lawsuit says it was seeking information relevant to some mining decisions for land adjacent to the parcel in the bid request.

    As of mid-May 2023, the City told Rare Earth it was still negotiating the contract with Tanner. Rare Earth filed a public records request for communications between Glendale and Tanner and claims the information in the eventual response indicates the contract terms are different from the bid. The complaint also cites exchanges between Assistant City Manager Jamsheed Mehta and Tanner staff regarding terms of the extension and bid selection.

    Rare Earth claims Tanner submitted its bid while knowing it could not complete the site work within the 90 window and accuses the City of working with Tanner to sell Tanner the property and reject Rare Earth’s bid. The company claims if it had been privy to the same terms and information as Tanner, it would have submitted a higher bid than Tanner’s $4.75M offer.

    The City also cites key differences between the companies’ bids. Specifically, Tanner offered a higher price and a construction plan for the improvements that indicated it would need more than 90 days to complete them. Rare Earth, meanwhile, offered a lower price and said it would hire a separate firm to complete the work within the specified time. Glendale says Rare Earth could have taken advantage of its equal opportunity but chose not to.

    Judge Timothy J. Ryan heard Glendale’s motion to dismiss the case in February but has not yet ruled. (Source)

    ABC Sand and Rock City of Glendale Jamsheed Mehta lawsuit litigation M.R. Tanner Construction Maricopa County Superior Court preferential treatment procurement rules Rare Earth LLC sale of city-owned land Timothy J. Ryan
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    4 Newly Installed Leaders Share Views on Their Roles, Goals and Challenges

    March 6, 2026

    Buckeye Considering Annexation for ViaWest Project at I-10 and SR 85

    March 6, 2026

    Appeals Court Strikes Down Arizona Cities Prevailing Wage Law

    March 3, 2026

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Our Picks

    4 Newly Installed Leaders Share Views on Their Roles, Goals and Challenges

    March 6, 2026

    Buckeye Considering Annexation for ViaWest Project at I-10 and SR 85

    March 6, 2026

    January Construction Prices Up and Year-over-Year

    March 6, 2026

    Arizona Projects 03-06-26

    March 6, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    BEX

    4 Newly Installed Leaders Share Views on Their Roles, Goals and Challenges

    March 6, 20260

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX Anyone who has ever stepped into a new role knows…

    Buckeye Considering Annexation for ViaWest Project at I-10 and SR 85

    March 6, 2026

    January Construction Prices Up and Year-over-Year

    March 6, 2026

    Arizona Projects 03-06-26

    March 6, 2026

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    4 Newly Installed Leaders Share Views on Their Roles, Goals and Challenges

    March 6, 2026

    Buckeye Considering Annexation for ViaWest Project at I-10 and SR 85

    March 6, 2026

    January Construction Prices Up and Year-over-Year

    March 6, 2026
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.