What's Hot

    Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

    June 23, 2026

    Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

    June 23, 2026

    Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

    June 23, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [June 23, 2026] - Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900
    • [June 23, 2026] - Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project
    • [June 23, 2026] - Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.
    • [June 23, 2026] - Industry Professionals 06-23-26
    • [June 23, 2026] - Commercial Real Estate 06-23-26
    • [June 19, 2026] - 59KSF Cold Storage Facility Planned in Gilbert
    • [June 19, 2026] - Mesa DRB Approves Revised Longbow Hotel & Retail Plan
    • [June 19, 2026] - LGE Q2 Delivery Report Shows Construction Gaining Momentum
    LinkedIn Facebook
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. ✎ Planning & Development
      3. 📰 Local News
      4. 🔎︎ Classifieds
      5. 🕵 Editorial Analysis
      6. 💰 Budgets & Funding
      7. 🏢 Commercial Real Estate
      8. 👔 People on the Move
      9. 🌵 Arizona Projects
      10. 🏛️ Legislation & Regulations
      11. 📈 Trends

      Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

      June 23, 2026

      59KSF Cold Storage Facility Planned in Gilbert

      June 19, 2026

      Mesa DRB Approves Revised Longbow Hotel & Retail Plan

      June 19, 2026

      21-Story Tower Development Planned in Roosevelt Row

      June 17, 2026

      Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

      June 23, 2026

      Flagstaff Advances Plans to Buy Downtown Development Site

      June 10, 2026

      Deadline Set for DBE Reevaluation

      June 5, 2026

      Dirty Data Does a Disservice to AI  

      May 29, 2026

      Affordability Reform Legislation May Gut BTR Sector

      April 28, 2026

      Developers Must Work Differently to Counter Intensifying Project Opposition

      January 6, 2026

      Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request

      July 29, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Arizona Budget Deal Halts Data Center Incentives for 3 Years

      June 16, 2026

      Gilbert Approves $1.7B 10-Year CIP

      May 26, 2026

      Mesa Proposing $285M GO Bond for Safety and Transportation Improvements

      May 23, 2026

      Lake Havasu City Considering Major Expenditures for Water Projects

      May 19, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 06-23-26

      June 23, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 06-16-26

      June 16, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 06-09-26

      June 9, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 06-02-26

      June 2, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-23-26

      June 23, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-16-26

      June 16, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-09-26

      June 9, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-02-26

      June 2, 2026

      Arizona Projects 06-19-26

      June 19, 2026

      Arizona Projects 06-12-26

      June 12, 2026

      Arizona Projects 06-05-26

      June 5, 2026

      Arizona Projects 05-29-26

      May 29, 2026

      New Law Enables Housing Infrastructure Financing Option

      June 16, 2026

      Judge Sides with Developers Against ADWR

      June 12, 2026

      Legislation Would Block Supervisors from Zoning Out Modular Nuclear

      June 12, 2026

      Goldwater Sues Phoenix Over Project and Land Sale Alleging Gift Clause Violation

      June 9, 2026

      Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

      June 23, 2026

      Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

      June 23, 2026

      LGE Q2 Delivery Report Shows Construction Gaining Momentum

      June 19, 2026

      Industrial Boom Largely Skipped Arizona’s Secondary Markets

      June 12, 2026

      Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

      June 23, 2026

      Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

      June 23, 2026

      Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

      June 23, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-23-26

      June 23, 2026
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Solicitations
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • DATABEX Log-In
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2026 Mid-Year Update
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    • CIP Special Report
    • NVBEX
    AZBEX
    Home»Legislation & Regulations»Company Claims Glendale Contract Rule Violation
    Legislation & Regulations

    Company Claims Glendale Contract Rule Violation

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffMarch 20, 2024No Comments4 Mins Read
    Credit: City of Glendale
    Share
    Facebook LinkedIn Email

    Rare Earth LLC has filed a lawsuit against the City of Glendale claiming the City violated its procurement rules when it awarded a bid to purchase a City-owned site by the Agua Fria River to a competing firm.

    Rare Earth, a Glendale-based mining and gravel company, alleges in a Maricopa County Superior Court complaint filed in November that Glendale set up its solicitation process to favor M.R. Tanner Construction’s bid for the 48-acre property between Glendale Avenue and Bethany Home Road over its submission.

    It also claims the terms of the contract between Tanner and Glendale do not follow those laid out in the bid request. Rare Earth is asking the Court to compel Glendale to perform the solicitation again.

    Glendale denies favoring Tanner and says both companies were given equal opportunities in the bidding process. The City has asked the Court to dismiss the claim and says it adhered to the local code.

    Tanner submitted a separate filing and noted Rare Earth’s offer was $2M, while Tanner’s was $4.75M.

    A key question comes down to whether both companies were held to the same rules and standards. Specifically, part of Glendale’s requirements was that the winning company fill in a hole and build berms at the location within a 90-day window.

    In its submission, Tanner claimed the timeline was unreasonable. The City later stipulated in its sale and purchase agreement that a 240-day extension was possible.

    Rare Earth claims it was not aware an extension was an option and that its bid was low because executing the required work within the 90-day timeline was an expensive undertaking.

    Glendale says Rare Earth had the same opportunities as Tanner to express any concerns about terms and timelines.

    Rare Earth and its affiliate company ABC Sand and Rock had approached the City in 2019 about entering into a mineral lease, the lawsuit claims. Glendale declined the offer because the site was connected to the City’s groundwater recharge.

    The company made another request in 2020 for portions of the site not connected to the aquifer recharge and was again rejected.

    Tanner approached the City about buying the property in 2021. Rather than accept Tanner’s unsolicited offer, Glendale says it issued the invitation to bid. The City says Rare Earth’s earlier attempts to buy the property did not entitle it to preferential treatment.

    In August 2022, Glendale issued an invitation for bids for City-owned parcels. The solicitation included a requirement to fill in an 850-foot by 400-foot hole, bring it level with Glendale Avenue and build berms around the property.

    Glendale opened the bids in September 2022 and announced its intent to award the sale to Tanner two months later. Between January and April of 2023, Rare Earth’s lawyers contacted Glendale several times to ask about the status of the contract with Tanner. The lawsuit says it was seeking information relevant to some mining decisions for land adjacent to the parcel in the bid request.

    As of mid-May 2023, the City told Rare Earth it was still negotiating the contract with Tanner. Rare Earth filed a public records request for communications between Glendale and Tanner and claims the information in the eventual response indicates the contract terms are different from the bid. The complaint also cites exchanges between Assistant City Manager Jamsheed Mehta and Tanner staff regarding terms of the extension and bid selection.

    Rare Earth claims Tanner submitted its bid while knowing it could not complete the site work within the 90 window and accuses the City of working with Tanner to sell Tanner the property and reject Rare Earth’s bid. The company claims if it had been privy to the same terms and information as Tanner, it would have submitted a higher bid than Tanner’s $4.75M offer.

    The City also cites key differences between the companies’ bids. Specifically, Tanner offered a higher price and a construction plan for the improvements that indicated it would need more than 90 days to complete them. Rare Earth, meanwhile, offered a lower price and said it would hire a separate firm to complete the work within the specified time. Glendale says Rare Earth could have taken advantage of its equal opportunity but chose not to.

    Judge Timothy J. Ryan heard Glendale’s motion to dismiss the case in February but has not yet ruled. (Source)

    ABC Sand and Rock City of Glendale Jamsheed Mehta lawsuit litigation M.R. Tanner Construction Maricopa County Superior Court preferential treatment procurement rules Rare Earth LLC sale of city-owned land Timothy J. Ryan
    Share. Facebook LinkedIn Reddit Email

    Related Posts

    Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

    June 23, 2026

    New Law Enables Housing Infrastructure Financing Option

    June 16, 2026

    Judge Sides with Developers Against ADWR

    June 12, 2026

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Our Picks

    Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

    June 23, 2026

    Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

    June 23, 2026

    Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

    June 23, 2026

    Industry Professionals 06-23-26

    June 23, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Local News

    Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

    June 23, 20260

    Employment in the Arizona Construction sector dramatically led those with gains in May, posting an…

    Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

    June 23, 2026

    Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

    June 23, 2026

    Industry Professionals 06-23-26

    June 23, 2026

    Through AZBEX (Arizona Builder's Exchange), NVBEX, DATABEX and BEX Events, BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms in Arizona and Nevada, as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturers' representatives, public agencies, private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and service providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

    June 23, 2026

    Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

    June 23, 2026

    Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

    June 23, 2026
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.