What's Hot

    Elliott Pollack Proposes 422-Acre Master Plan in Surprise

    June 16, 2026

    New Law Enables Housing Infrastructure Financing Option

    June 16, 2026

    Arizona Budget Deal Halts Data Center Incentives for 3 Years

    June 16, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [June 16, 2026] - Elliott Pollack Proposes 422-Acre Master Plan in Surprise
    • [June 16, 2026] - New Law Enables Housing Infrastructure Financing Option
    • [June 16, 2026] - Arizona Budget Deal Halts Data Center Incentives for 3 Years
    • [June 16, 2026] - Industry Professionals 06-16-26
    • [June 16, 2026] - Commercial Real Estate 06-16-26
    • [June 12, 2026] - Industrial Boom Largely Skipped Arizona’s Secondary Markets
    • [June 12, 2026] - Rising Costs Push Budget Increase for Mohave County Morgue
    • [June 12, 2026] - Judge Sides with Developers Against ADWR
    LinkedIn Facebook
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. ✎ Planning & Development
      3. 📰 Local News
      4. 🔎︎ Classifieds
      5. 🕵 Editorial Analysis
      6. 💰 Budgets & Funding
      7. 🏢 Commercial Real Estate
      8. 👔 People on the Move
      9. 🌵 Arizona Projects
      10. 🏛️ Legislation & Regulations
      11. 📈 Trends

      Elliott Pollack Proposes 422-Acre Master Plan in Surprise

      June 16, 2026

      Rising Costs Push Budget Increase for Mohave County Morgue

      June 12, 2026

      Ballroom Improvements Coming Next in PV DoubleTree Renovation

      June 9, 2026

      ADOT Wants Central Phoenix Freeway Project Input

      June 5, 2026

      Flagstaff Advances Plans to Buy Downtown Development Site

      June 10, 2026

      Deadline Set for DBE Reevaluation

      June 5, 2026

      Dirty Data Does a Disservice to AI  

      May 29, 2026

      Ariz. Construction Down 800 Jobs in April, 3,100 Year-over-Year

      May 26, 2026

      Affordability Reform Legislation May Gut BTR Sector

      April 28, 2026

      Developers Must Work Differently to Counter Intensifying Project Opposition

      January 6, 2026

      Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request

      July 29, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Arizona Budget Deal Halts Data Center Incentives for 3 Years

      June 16, 2026

      Gilbert Approves $1.7B 10-Year CIP

      May 26, 2026

      Mesa Proposing $285M GO Bond for Safety and Transportation Improvements

      May 23, 2026

      Lake Havasu City Considering Major Expenditures for Water Projects

      May 19, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 06-16-26

      June 16, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 06-09-26

      June 9, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 06-02-26

      June 2, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 05-26-26

      May 26, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-16-26

      June 16, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-09-26

      June 9, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-02-26

      June 2, 2026

      Industry Professionals 05-26-26

      May 26, 2026

      Arizona Projects 06-12-26

      June 12, 2026

      Arizona Projects 06-05-26

      June 5, 2026

      Arizona Projects 05-29-26

      May 29, 2026

      Arizona Projects 05-22-26

      May 23, 2026

      New Law Enables Housing Infrastructure Financing Option

      June 16, 2026

      Judge Sides with Developers Against ADWR

      June 12, 2026

      Legislation Would Block Supervisors from Zoning Out Modular Nuclear

      June 12, 2026

      Goldwater Sues Phoenix Over Project and Land Sale Alleging Gift Clause Violation

      June 9, 2026

      Industrial Boom Largely Skipped Arizona’s Secondary Markets

      June 12, 2026

      Phoenix Construction Costs Outpaced National Average in Q1

      June 9, 2026

      U.S. Construction Job Openings Up 25,000 in April

      June 5, 2026

      Multifamily ‘Rebalancing’ Nationally; Phoenix Pipeline Remains Heavy

      June 2, 2026

      Elliott Pollack Proposes 422-Acre Master Plan in Surprise

      June 16, 2026

      New Law Enables Housing Infrastructure Financing Option

      June 16, 2026

      Arizona Budget Deal Halts Data Center Incentives for 3 Years

      June 16, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-16-26

      June 16, 2026
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Solicitations
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • DATABEX Log-In
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2026 Mid-Year Update
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    • CIP Special Report
    • NVBEX
    AZBEX
    Home»Budgets & Funding»Contractors Say Fed. Project Labor Rules Will Add Costs
    Budgets & Funding

    Contractors Say Fed. Project Labor Rules Will Add Costs

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffOctober 5, 2022No Comments3 Mins Read
    Credit: Phoenix Business Journal
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    By Associated Builders and Contractors

    According to a September 2022 survey of Associated Builders and Contractors contractor members, 98% oppose President Biden’s proposed rule mandating project labor agreements on federal construction projects of $35M or more. PLA schemes exclude almost nine out of 10 workers from participating in these contracts.

    “The overwhelming opposition to PLA mandates demonstrates that fair and open competition on federal and federally assisted infrastructure projects is a win-win for taxpayers and the U.S. economy because it ensures all Americans and qualified companies are welcome to fairly compete to rebuild America’s infrastructure,” said ABC VP of Regulatory, Labor and State Affairs Ben Brubeck. “In contrast, the Biden administration’s proposed rule requiring government mandated PLAs on federal contracts of $35M or more, and other policies promoting PLAs on federally assisted construction projects, will needlessly increase costs by 12% to 20% and reduce competition from quality contractors and the 87.4% of construction workers who freely choose not to join a union.”

    According to the survey:

    • 97% of survey respondents said a construction contract that required a PLA would be more expensive compared to a contract procured via free and open competition.
    • 99% said they were less likely to bid on a taxpayer-funded construction contract if the bid specifications required the winning firm to sign a PLA with labor unions.
    • 97% of respondents said that government-mandated PLAs decrease economy and efficiency in government contracting.
    • 96% expected a requirement to result in less competition from subcontractors.
    • 95% of survey respondents said the requirements of government-mandated PLAs for firms to contribute to union benefits programs harm employees and 96% said they undermine investments in workforce development programs.

    “Between 2009 and 2021, federal agencies mandated just 12 PLAs on 2,075 federal construction projects of $25M or more, illustrating that when given the option, PLA mandates are unnecessary on federal construction projects,” said Brubeck. “ABC members are top federal contractors – they were awarded 57% of the value of $127B worth of large-scale federal construction projects during this time period – but are needlessly excluded by the Biden administration’s policies promoting PLAs, which favor unionized contractors and labor.”

    The majority of survey respondents said PLA mandates would either result in construction projects that are less safe (65%) or have no impact on safety (34%). Three-quarters (75%) said PLAs would result in poorer quality or have no impact on quality (24%). Fully 85% said PLA mandates decrease the likelihood of completing a project on time and on budget, with 9% saying there would be no impact. 

    In addition, 94% of survey respondents said a PLA would result in worse local hiring outcomes for a project. Almost 69% of respondents agreed that a PLA would decrease the hiring of women, veteran and disadvantaged business enterprises and construction workers, which have traditionally been unaffiliated with labor unions, while another 27% of respondents felt that PLAs would have no effect in hiring these disadvantaged populations and contractors.

    The survey of ABC member contractors was conducted between Sept. 7 and 23 following the Biden administration’s Aug. 19 release of the Federal Acquisition Regulation Council’s proposed rule (FAR Case 2022-003, Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects RIN: 9000-AO40) implementing President Biden’s Feb. 4 Executive Order 14063.

    ABC and a coalition of construction industry, small business and taxpayer advocates strongly oppose the Obama and Biden administration’s pro-PLA policies and have  advocated for federal legislation, the Fair and Open Competition Act (S. 403/H.R. 1284), which prohibits government-mandated PLAs on federal and federally assisted projects.  (Source)

    ABC Associated Builders and Contractors Ben Brubeck Biden Administration Executive Order 14063 Federal Acquisition Regulation Council Federal policy labor rules Obama Administration PLA project labor agreements Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Arizona Budget Deal Halts Data Center Incentives for 3 Years

    June 16, 2026

    U.S. Construction Job Openings Up 25,000 in April

    June 5, 2026

    Gilbert Approves $1.7B 10-Year CIP

    May 26, 2026

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Our Picks

    Elliott Pollack Proposes 422-Acre Master Plan in Surprise

    June 16, 2026

    New Law Enables Housing Infrastructure Financing Option

    June 16, 2026

    Arizona Budget Deal Halts Data Center Incentives for 3 Years

    June 16, 2026

    Industry Professionals 06-16-26

    June 16, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Planning & Development

    Elliott Pollack Proposes 422-Acre Master Plan in Surprise

    June 16, 20260

    A trio of entities tracing back to Arizona real estate economist and consultant Elliott Pollack…

    New Law Enables Housing Infrastructure Financing Option

    June 16, 2026

    Arizona Budget Deal Halts Data Center Incentives for 3 Years

    June 16, 2026

    Industry Professionals 06-16-26

    June 16, 2026

    Through AZBEX (Arizona Builder's Exchange), NVBEX, DATABEX and BEX Events, BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms in Arizona and Nevada, as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturers' representatives, public agencies, private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and service providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Elliott Pollack Proposes 422-Acre Master Plan in Surprise

    June 16, 2026

    New Law Enables Housing Infrastructure Financing Option

    June 16, 2026

    Arizona Budget Deal Halts Data Center Incentives for 3 Years

    June 16, 2026
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.