What's Hot

    Buckeye P&Z to Consider Rezoning for Freeway Industrial Development

    April 14, 2026

    U.S. to Build Out Multiple Border Sites with Parallel Wall Construction

    April 14, 2026

    Industrial and Office Data Show Healthy Markets in Q1

    April 14, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [April 14, 2026] - Buckeye P&Z to Consider Rezoning for Freeway Industrial Development
    • [April 14, 2026] - U.S. to Build Out Multiple Border Sites with Parallel Wall Construction
    • [April 14, 2026] - Industrial and Office Data Show Healthy Markets in Q1
    • [April 14, 2026] - Industry Professionals 04-14-26
    • [April 14, 2026] - Commercial Real Estate 04-14-26
    • [April 10, 2026] - Payson P&Z Recommends Approvals for New Master Plan
    • [April 10, 2026] - 164 Room AC Hotel Planned for Main St. in Mesa
    • [April 10, 2026] - Mesa City Council Approves $61M GO Bond Sale
    LinkedIn Facebook
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. ✎ Planning & Development
      3. 📰 Local News
      4. 🔎︎ Classifieds
      5. 🕵 Editorial Analysis
      6. 💰 Budgets & Funding
      7. 🏢 Commercial Real Estate
      8. 👔 People on the Move
      9. 🌵 Arizona Projects
      10. 🏛️ Legislation & Regulations
      11. 📈 Trends

      Buckeye P&Z to Consider Rezoning for Freeway Industrial Development

      April 14, 2026

      U.S. to Build Out Multiple Border Sites with Parallel Wall Construction

      April 14, 2026

      Payson P&Z Recommends Approvals for New Master Plan

      April 10, 2026

      164 Room AC Hotel Planned for Main St. in Mesa

      April 10, 2026

      Flagstaff Planning and Zoning Commission Moves Forward with Data Center Ban

      April 10, 2026

      Ariz. Construction Shed 2,200 Jobs in January

      April 7, 2026

      Phoenix Crane Count Steady in Q1

      April 7, 2026

      ADOT Successfully Delivers Integrated Design-Build Projects

      April 3, 2026

      Developers Must Work Differently to Counter Intensifying Project Opposition

      January 6, 2026

      Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request

      July 29, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Legislation Would Effectively Strip NIMBYs of Referendum Tool

      February 11, 2025

      Mesa City Council Approves $61M GO Bond Sale

      April 10, 2026

      Gilbert Schools Considering $136M Bond Request

      March 31, 2026

      Ruling Give 8 Months, No Guidance, For State to Fix School Funding

      March 10, 2026

      Gilbert Considering Other Methods to Fund Transportation Projects

      January 6, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 04-14-26

      April 14, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 04-07-26

      April 7, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 03-31-26

      March 31, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 03-24-26

      March 24, 2026

      Industry Professionals 04-14-26

      April 14, 2026

      Industry Professionals 04-07-26

      April 7, 2026

      Industry Professionals 03-31-26

      March 31, 2026

      Industry Professionals 03-24-26

      March 24, 2026

      Arizona Projects 04-10-26

      April 10, 2026

      Arizona Projects 04-03-26

      April 3, 2026

      Arizona Projects 03-27-26

      March 27, 2026

      Arizona Projects 03-20-26

      March 20, 2026

      Flagstaff Considering Imposing Data Center Restrictions

      March 27, 2026

      Cities May Have to Pay for Data Center Zoning Restrictions Under State Law

      March 27, 2026

      Bill to Curtail Municipal Home Design Requirements Stirs Controversy

      March 25, 2026

      Federal Housing Bill Could Gut BTR Development

      March 17, 2026

      Industrial and Office Data Show Healthy Markets in Q1

      April 14, 2026

      Ariz. Construction Shed 2,200 Jobs in January

      April 7, 2026

      Phoenix Crane Count Steady in Q1

      April 7, 2026

      February U.S. Construction Hiring Rate was Slowest on Record

      April 3, 2026

      Buckeye P&Z to Consider Rezoning for Freeway Industrial Development

      April 14, 2026

      U.S. to Build Out Multiple Border Sites with Parallel Wall Construction

      April 14, 2026

      Industrial and Office Data Show Healthy Markets in Q1

      April 14, 2026

      Industry Professionals 04-14-26

      April 14, 2026
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Solicitations
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • DATABEX Log-In
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2026 Public Works LMS
      • 2026 Construction Activity Forecast
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    • CIP Special Report
    AZBEX
    Home»Budgets & Funding»Contractors Say Fed. Project Labor Rules Will Add Costs
    Budgets & Funding

    Contractors Say Fed. Project Labor Rules Will Add Costs

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffOctober 5, 2022No Comments3 Mins Read
    Credit: Phoenix Business Journal
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    By Associated Builders and Contractors

    According to a September 2022 survey of Associated Builders and Contractors contractor members, 98% oppose President Biden’s proposed rule mandating project labor agreements on federal construction projects of $35M or more. PLA schemes exclude almost nine out of 10 workers from participating in these contracts.

    “The overwhelming opposition to PLA mandates demonstrates that fair and open competition on federal and federally assisted infrastructure projects is a win-win for taxpayers and the U.S. economy because it ensures all Americans and qualified companies are welcome to fairly compete to rebuild America’s infrastructure,” said ABC VP of Regulatory, Labor and State Affairs Ben Brubeck. “In contrast, the Biden administration’s proposed rule requiring government mandated PLAs on federal contracts of $35M or more, and other policies promoting PLAs on federally assisted construction projects, will needlessly increase costs by 12% to 20% and reduce competition from quality contractors and the 87.4% of construction workers who freely choose not to join a union.”

    According to the survey:

    • 97% of survey respondents said a construction contract that required a PLA would be more expensive compared to a contract procured via free and open competition.
    • 99% said they were less likely to bid on a taxpayer-funded construction contract if the bid specifications required the winning firm to sign a PLA with labor unions.
    • 97% of respondents said that government-mandated PLAs decrease economy and efficiency in government contracting.
    • 96% expected a requirement to result in less competition from subcontractors.
    • 95% of survey respondents said the requirements of government-mandated PLAs for firms to contribute to union benefits programs harm employees and 96% said they undermine investments in workforce development programs.

    “Between 2009 and 2021, federal agencies mandated just 12 PLAs on 2,075 federal construction projects of $25M or more, illustrating that when given the option, PLA mandates are unnecessary on federal construction projects,” said Brubeck. “ABC members are top federal contractors – they were awarded 57% of the value of $127B worth of large-scale federal construction projects during this time period – but are needlessly excluded by the Biden administration’s policies promoting PLAs, which favor unionized contractors and labor.”

    The majority of survey respondents said PLA mandates would either result in construction projects that are less safe (65%) or have no impact on safety (34%). Three-quarters (75%) said PLAs would result in poorer quality or have no impact on quality (24%). Fully 85% said PLA mandates decrease the likelihood of completing a project on time and on budget, with 9% saying there would be no impact. 

    In addition, 94% of survey respondents said a PLA would result in worse local hiring outcomes for a project. Almost 69% of respondents agreed that a PLA would decrease the hiring of women, veteran and disadvantaged business enterprises and construction workers, which have traditionally been unaffiliated with labor unions, while another 27% of respondents felt that PLAs would have no effect in hiring these disadvantaged populations and contractors.

    The survey of ABC member contractors was conducted between Sept. 7 and 23 following the Biden administration’s Aug. 19 release of the Federal Acquisition Regulation Council’s proposed rule (FAR Case 2022-003, Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects RIN: 9000-AO40) implementing President Biden’s Feb. 4 Executive Order 14063.

    ABC and a coalition of construction industry, small business and taxpayer advocates strongly oppose the Obama and Biden administration’s pro-PLA policies and have  advocated for federal legislation, the Fair and Open Competition Act (S. 403/H.R. 1284), which prohibits government-mandated PLAs on federal and federally assisted projects.  (Source)

    ABC Associated Builders and Contractors Ben Brubeck Biden Administration Executive Order 14063 Federal Acquisition Regulation Council Federal policy labor rules Obama Administration PLA project labor agreements Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Mesa City Council Approves $61M GO Bond Sale

    April 10, 2026

    February U.S. Construction Hiring Rate was Slowest on Record

    April 3, 2026

    Gilbert Schools Considering $136M Bond Request

    March 31, 2026

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Our Picks

    Buckeye P&Z to Consider Rezoning for Freeway Industrial Development

    April 14, 2026

    U.S. to Build Out Multiple Border Sites with Parallel Wall Construction

    April 14, 2026

    Industrial and Office Data Show Healthy Markets in Q1

    April 14, 2026

    Industry Professionals 04-14-26

    April 14, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Planning & Development

    Buckeye P&Z to Consider Rezoning for Freeway Industrial Development

    April 14, 20260

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX With the Buckeye City Council having approved an 85-acre annexation…

    U.S. to Build Out Multiple Border Sites with Parallel Wall Construction

    April 14, 2026

    Industrial and Office Data Show Healthy Markets in Q1

    April 14, 2026

    Industry Professionals 04-14-26

    April 14, 2026

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Buckeye P&Z to Consider Rezoning for Freeway Industrial Development

    April 14, 2026

    U.S. to Build Out Multiple Border Sites with Parallel Wall Construction

    April 14, 2026

    Industrial and Office Data Show Healthy Markets in Q1

    April 14, 2026
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.