What's Hot

    Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

    June 23, 2026

    Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

    June 23, 2026

    Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

    June 23, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [June 23, 2026] - Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900
    • [June 23, 2026] - Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project
    • [June 23, 2026] - Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.
    • [June 23, 2026] - Industry Professionals 06-23-26
    • [June 23, 2026] - Commercial Real Estate 06-23-26
    • [June 19, 2026] - 59KSF Cold Storage Facility Planned in Gilbert
    • [June 19, 2026] - Mesa DRB Approves Revised Longbow Hotel & Retail Plan
    • [June 19, 2026] - LGE Q2 Delivery Report Shows Construction Gaining Momentum
    LinkedIn Facebook
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. ✎ Planning & Development
      3. 📰 Local News
      4. 🔎︎ Classifieds
      5. 🕵 Editorial Analysis
      6. 💰 Budgets & Funding
      7. 🏢 Commercial Real Estate
      8. 👔 People on the Move
      9. 🌵 Arizona Projects
      10. 🏛️ Legislation & Regulations
      11. 📈 Trends

      Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

      June 23, 2026

      59KSF Cold Storage Facility Planned in Gilbert

      June 19, 2026

      Mesa DRB Approves Revised Longbow Hotel & Retail Plan

      June 19, 2026

      21-Story Tower Development Planned in Roosevelt Row

      June 17, 2026

      Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

      June 23, 2026

      Flagstaff Advances Plans to Buy Downtown Development Site

      June 10, 2026

      Deadline Set for DBE Reevaluation

      June 5, 2026

      Dirty Data Does a Disservice to AI  

      May 29, 2026

      Affordability Reform Legislation May Gut BTR Sector

      April 28, 2026

      Developers Must Work Differently to Counter Intensifying Project Opposition

      January 6, 2026

      Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request

      July 29, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Arizona Budget Deal Halts Data Center Incentives for 3 Years

      June 16, 2026

      Gilbert Approves $1.7B 10-Year CIP

      May 26, 2026

      Mesa Proposing $285M GO Bond for Safety and Transportation Improvements

      May 23, 2026

      Lake Havasu City Considering Major Expenditures for Water Projects

      May 19, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 06-23-26

      June 23, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 06-16-26

      June 16, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 06-09-26

      June 9, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 06-02-26

      June 2, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-23-26

      June 23, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-16-26

      June 16, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-09-26

      June 9, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-02-26

      June 2, 2026

      Arizona Projects 06-19-26

      June 19, 2026

      Arizona Projects 06-12-26

      June 12, 2026

      Arizona Projects 06-05-26

      June 5, 2026

      Arizona Projects 05-29-26

      May 29, 2026

      New Law Enables Housing Infrastructure Financing Option

      June 16, 2026

      Judge Sides with Developers Against ADWR

      June 12, 2026

      Legislation Would Block Supervisors from Zoning Out Modular Nuclear

      June 12, 2026

      Goldwater Sues Phoenix Over Project and Land Sale Alleging Gift Clause Violation

      June 9, 2026

      Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

      June 23, 2026

      Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

      June 23, 2026

      LGE Q2 Delivery Report Shows Construction Gaining Momentum

      June 19, 2026

      Industrial Boom Largely Skipped Arizona’s Secondary Markets

      June 12, 2026

      Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

      June 23, 2026

      Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

      June 23, 2026

      Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

      June 23, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-23-26

      June 23, 2026
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Solicitations
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • DATABEX Log-In
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2026 Mid-Year Update
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    • CIP Special Report
    • NVBEX
    AZBEX
    Home»Uncategorized»Prevailing Wage Rule Change May Impact Infrastructure Investment
    Uncategorized

    Prevailing Wage Rule Change May Impact Infrastructure Investment

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffAugust 11, 2023No Comments3 Mins Read
    Credit: Fieldwire
    Share
    Facebook LinkedIn Email

    By Associated Builders and Contractors

    Associated Builders and Contractors issued the following statement in response to the U.S. Department of Labor issuing a final rule, Updating the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts Regulations, which will make drastic revisions to the Davis-Bacon Act and Related Acts regulations that apply to federal and federally assisted construction projects funded by taxpayers.

    “This is yet another Biden administration handout to organized labor on the backs of taxpayers, small businesses and the free market,” said ABC VP, Labor and State Affairs Ben Brubeck. “Unfortunately, the DOL’s final rule disregards the feedback of ABC contractors, construction industry stakeholders and thousands of small businesses urging the withdrawal of this unnecessary, costly and burdensome regulation. Instead, the DOL is moving forward with dramatic changes to prevailing wage regulations, reversing much-needed reforms that were established nearly 40 years ago, and unlawfully increasing the regulatory burden on small businesses, new industries and public works projects.” 

    “With this final rule, the DOL has abandoned any possibility of instituting commonsense reforms to Davis-Bacon regulations to ensure accurate and prompt prevailing wage determinations while providing the regulated community with the clarity needed to deliver high-quality projects at an affordable cost to taxpayers,” said Brubeck. “Instead, the rule makes it much more likely that the DOL will adopt union wage scales at the prevailing wage at a greater frequency than in current practice, which already adopts union wage scales at improbable rates considering just 11.7% of the construction industry is unionized. ABC will now be forced to take appropriate legal action to address the numerous illegal provisions of the final rule and protect our members, and ultimately hard-working taxpayers, from the harmful impacts of this regulation.

    “The final rule comes in the midst of challenging economic conditions facing the construction industry, including high materials costs and a skilled labor shortage of more than half a million in 2023,” said Brubeck. “The onerous new requirements and artificial inflation of construction costs imposed by this rule will only exacerbate these headwinds and undermine taxpayer investments in infrastructure.”

    ABC submitted nearly 70 pages of comments on the DOL’s proposed rule, and its more than 50 significant changes, urging the DOL to withdraw the proposal.

    The 1931 Davis-Bacon Act and related regulations require contractors and subcontractors that perform work on federal and federally funded construction projects of $2K or more to pay a government-determined prevailing wage and benefit rate on an hourly basis to on-site construction workers. According to the DOL rulemaking, the Davis-Bacon Act and 71 active Related Acts collectively apply to an estimated $217B in federal and federally assisted construction spending per year—about 63% of all government construction put in place—and provide government-determined wage rates for an estimated 1.2 million U.S. construction workers.

    The Congressional Budget Office estimates that repealing the 1930s-era Davis-Bacon Act would save the federal government $24.3B in spending between 2023 and 2032. A May 2022 study found that the Davis-Bacon Act costs taxpayers an extra $21B a year, increases the price tag of construction projects by at least 7.2% and inflates construction workforce wages by 20.2% compared to local market averages if the DOL calculated prevailing wages using modern and scientific methodology via the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Learn more at abc.org/davisbacon. (Source)

    ABC Associated Builders and Contractors Ben Brubeck Biden Administration CBO Congressional Budget Office Davis-Bacon Act Davis-Bacon Rule DoL Federal infrastructure investment labor organizations labor shortage labor unions litigation materials costs prevailing wage public projects Public Works regulations regulatory impact U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics U.S. Department of Labor Updating the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts Regulations wages and benefits
    Share. Facebook LinkedIn Reddit Email

    Related Posts

    Rising Costs Push Budget Increase for Mohave County Morgue

    June 12, 2026

    Phoenix Construction Costs Outpaced National Average in Q1

    June 9, 2026

    Goldwater Sues Phoenix Over Project and Land Sale Alleging Gift Clause Violation

    June 9, 2026

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Our Picks

    Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

    June 23, 2026

    Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

    June 23, 2026

    Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

    June 23, 2026

    Industry Professionals 06-23-26

    June 23, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Local News

    Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

    June 23, 20260

    Employment in the Arizona Construction sector dramatically led those with gains in May, posting an…

    Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

    June 23, 2026

    Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

    June 23, 2026

    Industry Professionals 06-23-26

    June 23, 2026

    Through AZBEX (Arizona Builder's Exchange), NVBEX, DATABEX and BEX Events, BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms in Arizona and Nevada, as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturers' representatives, public agencies, private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and service providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

    June 23, 2026

    Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

    June 23, 2026

    Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

    June 23, 2026
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.