What's Hot

    Payson Approves Development Agreement for 74-Unit Affordable Community

    March 13, 2026

    Corporation Commission Approves Two Coal-to-Natural Gas Plant Conversions

    March 13, 2026

    Backlog Indicator Rebounds; Confidence Increases in February

    March 13, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [March 13, 2026] - Payson Approves Development Agreement for 74-Unit Affordable Community
    • [March 13, 2026] - Corporation Commission Approves Two Coal-to-Natural Gas Plant Conversions
    • [March 13, 2026] - Backlog Indicator Rebounds; Confidence Increases in February
    • [March 13, 2026] - Pima County Voters Approve $2.67B in Transportation Funding
    • [March 13, 2026] - Arizona Projects 03-13-26
    • [March 11, 2026] - Arizona Water Company Receives Designation for 100-Year Assured Water Supply
    • [March 10, 2026] - Construction to See Slowing Employment Growth Through 2027
    • [March 10, 2026] - Sedona Resort Planning 40-Room Expansion
    LinkedIn Facebook
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. ✎ Planning & Development
      3. 📰 Local News
      4. 🔎︎ Classifieds
      5. 🕵 Editorial Analysis
      6. 💰 Budgets & Funding
      7. 🏢 Commercial Real Estate
      8. 👔 People on the Move
      9. 🌵 Arizona Projects
      10. 🏛️ Legislation & Regulations
      11. 📈 Trends

      Payson Approves Development Agreement for 74-Unit Affordable Community

      March 13, 2026

      Corporation Commission Approves Two Coal-to-Natural Gas Plant Conversions

      March 13, 2026

      Sedona Resort Planning 40-Room Expansion

      March 10, 2026

      Data Center Changes Result in Plan Change to Mixed-Use

      March 3, 2026

      Pima County Voters Approve $2.67B in Transportation Funding

      March 13, 2026

      Arizona Water Company Receives Designation for 100-Year Assured Water Supply

      March 11, 2026

      Construction to See Slowing Employment Growth Through 2027

      March 10, 2026

      4 Newly Installed Leaders Share Views on Their Roles, Goals and Challenges

      March 6, 2026

      Developers Must Work Differently to Counter Intensifying Project Opposition

      January 6, 2026

      Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request

      July 29, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Legislation Would Effectively Strip NIMBYs of Referendum Tool

      February 11, 2025

      Ruling Give 8 Months, No Guidance, For State to Fix School Funding

      March 10, 2026

      Gilbert Considering Other Methods to Fund Transportation Projects

      January 6, 2026

      Public School Bonds Split at the Ballot

      November 7, 2025

      Early voting for Coconino Community College bond begins this week

      October 7, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 03-03-26

      March 3, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 02-24-26

      February 24, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 02-17-26

      February 17, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 02-10-26

      February 10, 2026

      Industry Professionals 03-10-26

      March 10, 2026

      Industry Professionals 03-03-26

      March 3, 2026

      Industry Professionals 02-24-26

      February 24, 2026

      Industry Professionals 02-03-26

      February 3, 2026

      Arizona Projects 03-13-26

      March 13, 2026

      Arizona Projects 03-06-26

      March 6, 2026

      Arizona Projects 02-27-26

      February 27, 2026

      Arizona Projects 02-20-26

      February 20, 2026

      Ruling Give 8 Months, No Guidance, For State to Fix School Funding

      March 10, 2026

      Appeals Court Strikes Down Arizona Cities Prevailing Wage Law

      March 3, 2026

      AG Appeals Project Blue Energy Agreement Approval

      February 24, 2026

      Proposed Bill Would Exempt Historic Neighborhoods from Housing Law

      February 17, 2026

      Backlog Indicator Rebounds; Confidence Increases in February

      March 13, 2026

      Construction to See Slowing Employment Growth Through 2027

      March 10, 2026

      January Construction Prices Up Month-over-Month and Year-over-Year

      March 6, 2026

      Phoenix Construction Costs Still Elevated as Activity Largely Normalizes

      February 27, 2026

      Payson Approves Development Agreement for 74-Unit Affordable Community

      March 13, 2026

      Corporation Commission Approves Two Coal-to-Natural Gas Plant Conversions

      March 13, 2026

      Backlog Indicator Rebounds; Confidence Increases in February

      March 13, 2026

      Pima County Voters Approve $2.67B in Transportation Funding

      March 13, 2026
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Solicitations
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • DATABEX Log-In
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2026 Public Works LMS
      • 2026 Construction Activity Forecast
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    • CIP Special Report
    AZBEX
    Home»Planning & Development»Chandler Officials Siding with Opponents of Affordable Project
    Planning & Development

    Chandler Officials Siding with Opponents of Affordable Project

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffOctober 19, 2022No Comments3 Mins Read
    Credit: East Valley Tribune
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Chandler officials have joined with neighborhood opponents against a planned joint senior and workforce affordable multifamily development on unincorporated Maricopa County land on Ocotillo Road.

    Affordable housing developer Dominium Management wants to build The Landings at Ocotillo, which would create a 182-unit senior living complex and 336-unit multifamily complex on 25 acres. Estimated rents for the units would be priced at between 8% and 12% less than standard market rates, according to projections.

    Chandler officials’ stated opposition stems from the City’s efforts to market the area, which is surrounded by Chandler land, as an employment corridor. They met with Dominium representatives to discuss alternate sites, but the company decided to continue pursuing plans at the original location.

    City planning officials said the residential development would harm potential industrial development in the area. They allege residents could be inconvenienced by the noise and activity on the industrial properties and that industrial developers may be disinclined to build there for fear of complaints from residents impacting their operations.

    While the decision to approve or deny the plan ultimately lies with the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Chandler is not without influence. Dominium had originally planned to request the site’s annexation into Chandler. The County supports that action because the developments will rely on City services and utilities.

    While the City opposes the proposal because of its location, officials said they suspect resident opposition will stem from the standard array of misinformation that often plagues affordably targeted developments, such as beliefs that the units will be targeted toward illegal immigrants or the homeless and that “subsidized” housing will lower property values.

    Chandler planning officials and Dominium representatives had a meeting last week to discuss the facts of the plan. Chandler officials have expressed support for workforce and other lower-rent multifamily developments in the city and have stated their opposition lies with Dominium’s planned location.

    County officials have said they are aware of Chandler’s opposition. Planning officials expect to make note of the circumstances in their report to the Maricopa County Planning and Zoning Commission.

    Dominium officials have said they are planning to continue with their Maricopa County rezoning efforts and pointed out medium-density residential exists across the street from their planned location.

    No hearing date has been set for the project to go before the Maricopa County Planning and Zoning Commission, but an early December timeframe is possible.

    Residents organizing in opposition to the plan will meet this week in the Chandler Police Department’s community room downtown.

    The land is currently owned by Shah and Hina Urvish. The Housing Authority of Maricopa County and Dominium Apartments are listed as co-developers on project materials. (Source)

    affordable housing apartments/condos City of Chandler Dominium Apartments Dominium Management employment corridor Housing Authority of Maricopa County Maricopa County Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Maricopa County Planning and Zoning Commission multifamily NIMBY Private senior affordable senior living The Landings at Ocotillo workforce affordable
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Payson Approves Development Agreement for 74-Unit Affordable Community

    March 13, 2026

    Corporation Commission Approves Two Coal-to-Natural Gas Plant Conversions

    March 13, 2026

    Construction to See Slowing Employment Growth Through 2027

    March 10, 2026

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Our Picks

    Payson Approves Development Agreement for 74-Unit Affordable Community

    March 13, 2026

    Corporation Commission Approves Two Coal-to-Natural Gas Plant Conversions

    March 13, 2026

    Backlog Indicator Rebounds; Confidence Increases in February

    March 13, 2026

    Pima County Voters Approve $2.67B in Transportation Funding

    March 13, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Planning & Development

    Payson Approves Development Agreement for 74-Unit Affordable Community

    March 13, 20260

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX On March 11, the Payson Town Council approved a motion…

    Corporation Commission Approves Two Coal-to-Natural Gas Plant Conversions

    March 13, 2026

    Backlog Indicator Rebounds; Confidence Increases in February

    March 13, 2026

    Pima County Voters Approve $2.67B in Transportation Funding

    March 13, 2026

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Payson Approves Development Agreement for 74-Unit Affordable Community

    March 13, 2026

    Corporation Commission Approves Two Coal-to-Natural Gas Plant Conversions

    March 13, 2026

    Backlog Indicator Rebounds; Confidence Increases in February

    March 13, 2026
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.