What's Hot

    Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

    June 23, 2026

    Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

    June 23, 2026

    Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

    June 23, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [June 23, 2026] - Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900
    • [June 23, 2026] - Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project
    • [June 23, 2026] - Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.
    • [June 23, 2026] - Industry Professionals 06-23-26
    • [June 23, 2026] - Commercial Real Estate 06-23-26
    • [June 19, 2026] - 59KSF Cold Storage Facility Planned in Gilbert
    • [June 19, 2026] - Mesa DRB Approves Revised Longbow Hotel & Retail Plan
    • [June 19, 2026] - LGE Q2 Delivery Report Shows Construction Gaining Momentum
    LinkedIn Facebook
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. ✎ Planning & Development
      3. 📰 Local News
      4. 🔎︎ Classifieds
      5. 🕵 Editorial Analysis
      6. 💰 Budgets & Funding
      7. 🏢 Commercial Real Estate
      8. 👔 People on the Move
      9. 🌵 Arizona Projects
      10. 🏛️ Legislation & Regulations
      11. 📈 Trends

      Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

      June 23, 2026

      59KSF Cold Storage Facility Planned in Gilbert

      June 19, 2026

      Mesa DRB Approves Revised Longbow Hotel & Retail Plan

      June 19, 2026

      21-Story Tower Development Planned in Roosevelt Row

      June 17, 2026

      Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

      June 23, 2026

      Flagstaff Advances Plans to Buy Downtown Development Site

      June 10, 2026

      Deadline Set for DBE Reevaluation

      June 5, 2026

      Dirty Data Does a Disservice to AI  

      May 29, 2026

      Affordability Reform Legislation May Gut BTR Sector

      April 28, 2026

      Developers Must Work Differently to Counter Intensifying Project Opposition

      January 6, 2026

      Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request

      July 29, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Arizona Budget Deal Halts Data Center Incentives for 3 Years

      June 16, 2026

      Gilbert Approves $1.7B 10-Year CIP

      May 26, 2026

      Mesa Proposing $285M GO Bond for Safety and Transportation Improvements

      May 23, 2026

      Lake Havasu City Considering Major Expenditures for Water Projects

      May 19, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 06-23-26

      June 23, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 06-16-26

      June 16, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 06-09-26

      June 9, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 06-02-26

      June 2, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-23-26

      June 23, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-16-26

      June 16, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-09-26

      June 9, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-02-26

      June 2, 2026

      Arizona Projects 06-19-26

      June 19, 2026

      Arizona Projects 06-12-26

      June 12, 2026

      Arizona Projects 06-05-26

      June 5, 2026

      Arizona Projects 05-29-26

      May 29, 2026

      New Law Enables Housing Infrastructure Financing Option

      June 16, 2026

      Judge Sides with Developers Against ADWR

      June 12, 2026

      Legislation Would Block Supervisors from Zoning Out Modular Nuclear

      June 12, 2026

      Goldwater Sues Phoenix Over Project and Land Sale Alleging Gift Clause Violation

      June 9, 2026

      Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

      June 23, 2026

      Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

      June 23, 2026

      LGE Q2 Delivery Report Shows Construction Gaining Momentum

      June 19, 2026

      Industrial Boom Largely Skipped Arizona’s Secondary Markets

      June 12, 2026

      Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

      June 23, 2026

      Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

      June 23, 2026

      Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

      June 23, 2026

      Industry Professionals 06-23-26

      June 23, 2026
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Solicitations
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • DATABEX Log-In
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2026 Mid-Year Update
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    • CIP Special Report
    • NVBEX
    AZBEX
    Home»Arizona Projects»Valley Transportation Planners ‘Imagine’ Another Sales Tax Extension
    Arizona Projects

    Valley Transportation Planners ‘Imagine’ Another Sales Tax Extension

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffDecember 7, 2018No Comments5 Mins Read
    Courtesy of ADOT
    Share
    Facebook LinkedIn Email

    By Adrienne St. Clair for Arizona Builder’s Exchange

    Transportation planners for Maricopa County are getting an early start on plans to extend Prop. 400 – a 0.5 percent sales tax increase approved back in 2005. Not only did they unveil their new “Imagine” proposition at the December APA/ASLA Networking Event Wednesday, Dec. 5, but they delivered the preliminary planning presentation nearly seven years before Prop. 400 will actually expire.

    Leading the presentation was Audra Koester Thomas from the Maricopa Association of Governments. She said the deadline for the new extension isn’t far away at all, but “really overnight for us.”

    Thomas is the transportation planning program manager at MAG, the metropolitan Phoenix area planning agency that led the development of Prop. 400 almost fifteen years ago.

    The upcoming plan to extend the sales tax increase has been informally known as Prop. 500 in keeping with the naming convention of its predecessors Prop. 400 and 300. However, according to Thomas, the name “Imagine” is meant to convey the possibilities of the future of transportation in the Valley —and also work around bureaucratic red tape where the name Prop. 500 is concerned.

    The details of “Imagine” are, in every sense, yet to be determined. But Thomas and her team don’t actually have until 2025 to figure it out. Federal statutes require agencies like MAG to design regional transportation plans with a 20-year lifespan, but they also require these plans to get on the ballot in an election year. So, while Prop. 400 still has years left in play, Thomas and her team are preparing to get its extension on the November 2022 ballot. And though they’ve technically got November 2024 if the 2022 vote doesn’t go well, Thomas doesn’t think of it like that. She’s completely focused on what happens four years from now.

    “If we fail [in 2022], we’ve failed,” she said.

    And she and her colleagues at MAG don’t want to fail. Thomas outlined a four-year plan of research, analysis and development to determine what the Valley needs and what its residents want. Thomas and her colleagues started running focus groups back in October and have set a goal to conduct a survey with more than 50,000 participants.

    She hopes the resulting “Imagine” proposition will be a plan that provides residents with multiple choices for transportation, and said that increasing options is the way to avoid congestion, as new freeway space is limited and the Valley continues to sprawl.

    There are metropolitan planning organizations all across the country, but Thomas said MAG is the second largest planning organization in geographical size. The area is larger than the state of Maryland, she said.

    The area’s size and continued fast-pace of growth are what inspired the original sales tax increase to fund transportation efforts. In 1985, the area was growing so fast that several mayors realized federal funds alone wouldn’t provide for the much needed freeways. As a solution, the county passed a local sales tax increase to provide more money for transportation infrastructure. According to Thomas, Prop. 300 was one of the first local sales tax increases passed in the country to fund transportation, even as it’s now a common practice across the U.S.

    When Prop. 300 was set to expire in 2005, Prop. 400 was passed in November 2004. Prop. 400 promised to finish the freeways, add transit and improve streets.

    However, several projects haven’t begun since they were promised in 2005. Thomas blames this on a loss of almost 10 years in revenue during the Great Recession. In 2014, The Arizona Republic reported that revenue was $1B less than expected.

    Carol Ketcherside, deputy director of planning at Valley Metro and one of just more than a dozen attendees Wednesday morning, echoed that, saying, “Of the things we promised, we lost 40 percent because of the Great Recession.”

    Thomas also said that when the economy finally bounced back, the revival brought unpredictable market conditions. Even as revenue began to increase, costs rose, too —  by 50 to 70 percent in some cases.

    “We have a really great story to tell in terms of the Great Recession,” she said.

    Thomas can’t guarantee that “Imagine” will include projects promised in Prop. 400. However, lawmakers just decided to pursue a $68M project on Loop 101, and they will be deciding on two more projects in January. According to Thomas, the plan for what to do with remaining Prop. 400 projects will be completely evaluated by Summer 2019.

    Thomas said they will use the next few years as a time to really reevaluate the future of Valley transportation. The Valley has changed since 2005 when Prop. 400 was first passed, and regional planners want to use the money for what the area needs. And according to Thomas, that will be tricky.

    “I’m telling you right now, we have more needs than funding will allow to support,” she said.

    Thomas anticipates the new “Imagine” will have less tangible projects than Prop. 400 and will focus more on public health, economy and safety and include things like operations improvements and maintenance — things she called “soft” measures. Planners may also explore the possibility of regional bus rapid transit or even implementation of a commuter rail to make it easier to travel between Valley cities.

    Thomas wonders about who will support the new “Imagine” proposition, as Prop. 400 had contractor and developer support largely due to the new freeway construction. She says it’s too soon to tell.

    “Champions will be largely colored by what the plan has in it,” she guessed.

    But Imagine’s success will ultimately depend on whether Thomas and her colleagues will be able to communicate their vision to Maricopa County voters.

    “At the end of the day, the public has to vote for this plan,” she said.

    ALSA APA MAG Maricopa Association of Governments Prop 300 Prop 400 Prop 500 Sales tax transportation transportation funding transportation planning Valley Metro
    Share. Facebook LinkedIn Reddit Email

    Related Posts

    Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

    June 23, 2026

    Arizona Projects 06-19-26

    June 19, 2026

    Arizona Budget Deal Halts Data Center Incentives for 3 Years

    June 16, 2026

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Our Picks

    Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

    June 23, 2026

    Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

    June 23, 2026

    Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

    June 23, 2026

    Industry Professionals 06-23-26

    June 23, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Local News

    Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

    June 23, 20260

    Employment in the Arizona Construction sector dramatically led those with gains in May, posting an…

    Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

    June 23, 2026

    Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

    June 23, 2026

    Industry Professionals 06-23-26

    June 23, 2026

    Through AZBEX (Arizona Builder's Exchange), NVBEX, DATABEX and BEX Events, BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms in Arizona and Nevada, as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturers' representatives, public agencies, private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and service providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Ariz. Construction Gained 2,700 in May, Cutting YoY Losses to 900

    June 23, 2026

    Yuma County Seeks Grant for Railroad Crossing Project

    June 23, 2026

    Latest Phoenix Office Report Shows Mixed Results vs. U.S.

    June 23, 2026
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.