What's Hot

    383-Unit Multifamily Project Recommended by Goodyear P&Z

    August 22, 2025

    Aviation Training Center Planned for Mesa-Gateway Airport

    August 22, 2025

    Magazine Tackles Construction Crisis by Inspiring Teen Girls to Enter Skilled Trades

    August 22, 2025
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [August 22, 2025] - 383-Unit Multifamily Project Recommended by Goodyear P&Z
    • [August 22, 2025] - Aviation Training Center Planned for Mesa-Gateway Airport
    • [August 22, 2025] - Magazine Tackles Construction Crisis by Inspiring Teen Girls to Enter Skilled Trades
    • [August 22, 2025] - Rezoning Recommended for 236KSF Mesa Industrial Plan
    • [August 22, 2025] - Arizona Projects 08-22-25
    • [August 20, 2025] - Old Town Scottsdale to See $40M in Improvements
    • [August 19, 2025] - Ariz. Construction Lost 400 Jobs in July
    • [August 19, 2025] - Astra Construction Delayed Due to Financing
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. Planning & Development
      3. Local News
      4. Classifieds
      5. Editorial Analysis
      6. Budgets & Funding
      7. Commercial Real Estate
      8. People on the Move
      9. Arizona Projects
      10. Legislation & Regulations
      11. Trends

      383-Unit Multifamily Project Recommended by Goodyear P&Z

      August 22, 2025

      Aviation Training Center Planned for Mesa-Gateway Airport

      August 22, 2025

      Rezoning Recommended for 236KSF Mesa Industrial Plan

      August 22, 2025

      Astra Construction Delayed Due to Financing

      August 19, 2025

      Magazine Tackles Construction Crisis by Inspiring Teen Girls to Enter Skilled Trades

      August 22, 2025

      Old Town Scottsdale to See $40M in Improvements

      August 20, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Lost 400 Jobs in July

      August 19, 2025

      Experts Share on the Latest Industrial Trends at BEX Panel

      August 15, 2025

      Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request

      July 29, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Legislation Would Effectively Strip NIMBYs of Referendum Tool

      February 11, 2025

      2025 Forecast Tries to Clarify an Uncertain Market

      February 7, 2025

      RTA Funding Proposal Stirs Controversy

      August 15, 2025

      Ariz. LIHTC to Sunset Under New Budget

      July 8, 2025

      State Government Shutdown Averted as Hobbs Signs Budget

      July 1, 2025

      Arterial Life Cycle Program Covers 20 Years of Street Development

      June 27, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 08-19-25

      August 19, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 08-12-25

      August 12, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 08-05-25

      August 5, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-29-25

      July 29, 2025

      Industry Professionals 08-19-25

      August 19, 2025

      Industry Professionals 08-12-25

      August 12, 2025

      Industry Professionals 08-05-25

      August 5, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-29-25

      July 29, 2025

      Arizona Projects 08-22-25

      August 22, 2025

      Arizona Projects 08-15-25

      August 15, 2025

      Arizona Projects 08-08-25

      August 8, 2025

      Arizona Projects 08-01-25

      August 1, 2025

      Tucson City Council Likely to Approve Water Restriction on Large

      August 19, 2025

      Ritz-Carlton Paradise Valley Fight Could End in Foreclosure

      August 15, 2025

      Ariz. Supreme Court Upholds Citizens’ Right to Halt Local Projects

      August 8, 2025

      Proposed Legislation Aims to Increase Housing Supply

      August 5, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Lost 400 Jobs in July

      August 19, 2025

      Experts Share on the Latest Industrial Trends at BEX Panel

      August 15, 2025

      Multifamily Developer Confidence Up in Q2

      August 12, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June

      July 22, 2025

      383-Unit Multifamily Project Recommended by Goodyear P&Z

      August 22, 2025

      Aviation Training Center Planned for Mesa-Gateway Airport

      August 22, 2025

      Magazine Tackles Construction Crisis by Inspiring Teen Girls to Enter Skilled Trades

      August 22, 2025

      Rezoning Recommended for 236KSF Mesa Industrial Plan

      August 22, 2025
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • DATABEX Log-In
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2025 Hospitality LMS
      • 2025 Public Works Conference
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    • CIP Special Report
    AZBEX
    Home » Planning & Development » SDLE Neighborhood, Council Opposition on Greenbelt 88
    Planning & Development

    SDLE Neighborhood, Council Opposition on Greenbelt 88

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffNovember 23, 2021No Comments7 Mins Read
    Credit: Nelsen Partners/City of Scottsdale
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX

    EDITOR’S NOTE: Make sure to check out the AZBEX November 30th edition, where we take a deep dive into development fatigue, the rise of neighborhood opposition and the potential impact they are having and may continue to have on housing and other development types in the Valley.

    A virulent neighborhood opposition movement and Scottsdale City Council generally opposed to increase in building heights and neighborhood density have led Lucky Plaza owner Todd Silver and his company, Village Property Management LLC to request and receive yet another continuance for a plan to redevelop the fading 1970s-era retail plaza into a multifamily and boutique retail mixed-use.

    The most recent iteration of the redevelopment plan, which would have placed 278 multifamily units and 25KSF of retail on the currently all-retail (>60KSF) approximately seven-acre site, was recommended for approval late this summer on a 4-3 vote of the Scottsdale Planning Commission. A zoning district map amendment and amended development standards are required for the project to proceed.

    The project has become a somewhat unlikely test case pitting redevelopment efforts against some development fatigue-laden residents who oppose new multifamily development anywhere in Scottsdale on the basis of community character. A group calling itself Safeguard Scottsdale has been the leading voice of opposition. While it has only 39 followers on Facebook, an ipetitions page, similar to petitions on change.org and other sites, has so far drawn 870 signatures.

    In an August 31st profile in Scottsdale Progress, group leader Jan Vuicich had predicted more than 1,000 signatures by the time the project proposal was to reach City Council in September. The petition has not yet been shared with the City Council and remains open on the site for new signatures.

    Not only did the petition numbers not reach the four-figure level, the project was continued at the developer’s request to permit more time and opportunity for the development team to work with opponents to address their concerns.

    Throughout the process, Vuicich and Safeguard Scottsdale have claimed Silver and his team were “inflexible” and unwilling to alter the proposal to better reflect residents’ desires for the future of the neighborhood. The team, however, has held multiple neighborhood meetings, repeatedly decreased the planned multifamily unit count, revised the height, made structural changes to the plans and implemented at least 15 revisions as a result of interactions with neighbors and planning staff, according to an August presentation before the Planning Commission.

    Social media postings on Facebook and Nextdoor show an impassioned, if not particularly expansive, degree of opposition. There are few, if any, arguments on project specifics, but hundreds of posts expressing variations on the mantras of, “No Apartments in Scottsdale!” and, “Say no to density!” Several posts also contain demonstrably false assertions about the project’s likely traffic impacts, building details and other aspects with no factual foundation.

    Opponents insist they are not against rejuvenating the plaza, but many are demanding commercial-only elements with a retail focus. This insistence comes despite the fact that Scottsdale is the Valley community most over-served by retail. Data from CoStar/ESRI show Scottsdale as having a retail per capita ratio of 90.1SF. Tempe is a distant second at 69.6SF.

    In addition to the general retail over-service and general decline of brick-and-mortar retail nationwide, Lucky Plaza is currently anchored by two under-trafficked big-box stores, which were struggling to maintain sufficient foot traffic to survive even before the pandemic.

    Opposition Headwinds Remain

    Opponents have found support in the current Scottsdale City Council. Mayor David Ortega and the most recently seated members were elected, in part, because of their anti-development stances, having gained prominence with successful opposition to the massive Southbridge 2.0 proposal once planned in the city’s downtown.

    Some members, including one-time project supporter Solange Whitehead, have publicly said they would not vote to approve the Greenbelt 88 redevelopment.

    In spite of the Planning Commission recommendation and a separate recommendation from Council staff posted on November 11th that the project be approved, the November 16th meeting would have been a certain defeat.

    Silver told AZBEX in the days leading up to the scheduled November 16th Council meeting he did not expect the project to win approval if it went before Council and that he was seeking a continuance to further revise the plan. He referred to the process as a “major uphill battle.”

    Originally planned for a 388-unit multifamily only development, the proposal was revised downward to 300, then to 288. Other revisions added 25KSF of retail and the inclusion of public amenities. The count was revised downward again to 278 units by the time it reached the Planning Commission and Council.

    Silver’s next revision will likely be a decrease to 258 units and more structural changes.

    In debating the request for continuance last week, Council members were unusually direct in expressing their sentiments. Scottsdale Progress quoted Whitehead as saying, “If this project had the support of the City Council, you would not be requesting an extension.”

    The same article reported Member Kathy Littlefield said she would not vote for the project even with the impending changes. “The project is too tall, it’s too dense, it offers too little retail and generates too much traffic,” she was quoted as having said. “None of that has changed. It’s out of character with the area and the whole idea of the greenbelt itself, which is openness to the neighbors and the neighborhoods who paid for it.”

    Despite the harassment Silver, the development team and project supporters have received from opponents through social media and elsewhere, Littlefield also spoke to champion opponents who claim the development team has been “disrespectful” and “inflexible.”

    The Scottsdale Independent quoted Littlefield as saying, “I don’t like name calling – when citizens come out and spend this much of their time, and their effort, and their interest and their love of the city to work this hard to try and get something they think will be good for their neighborhoods, and then to get into some kind of name-calling combat situation, that’s not right. They’re just citizens of Scottsdale living in this neighborhood, they get no reimbursement for their time or their energy, they just care.”

    Mayor Ortega also questioned the continuance, saying he would prefer to see the project scrapped and resubmitted as a new proposal. He was quoted in the Independent report as saying, “I believe it would be more useful for, I don’t want to call it the baggage, of maybe 300-400 pages of the previous project to carry forward in a continuance format. I believe it would serve everyone better if it were restarted as a new project.” He also noted the amount of time staff has spent on various reviews and lamented the burden and expense in terms of hours the project has received compared to its original application fee.

    While he ultimately encouraged the development team to continue its work on revising the project plans, Ortega, too, said he would oppose the project if it were not significantly altered.

    Ultimately, Council voted 6-1 to continue the project until February. Littlefield was the dissenting vote. Progress quoted her as saying, “Requesting one more month, or two more months or three more months for a new design and insight from the community does not leave me hopeful.”

    apartments/condos change.org CoStar/ESRI David Ortega ipetitions Jan Vuicich Kathy Littlefield Lucky Plaza Mixed-Use multifamily neighborhood opposition NIMBY Private retail Safeguard Scottsdale Scottsdale City Council Scottsdale Planning Commission Solange Whitehead Southbridge 2.0 Todd Silver Village Property Management LLC
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    383-Unit Multifamily Project Recommended by Goodyear P&Z

    August 22, 2025

    Aviation Training Center Planned for Mesa-Gateway Airport

    August 22, 2025

    Rezoning Recommended for 236KSF Mesa Industrial Plan

    August 22, 2025

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Our Picks

    383-Unit Multifamily Project Recommended by Goodyear P&Z

    August 22, 2025

    Aviation Training Center Planned for Mesa-Gateway Airport

    August 22, 2025

    Magazine Tackles Construction Crisis by Inspiring Teen Girls to Enter Skilled Trades

    August 22, 2025

    Rezoning Recommended for 236KSF Mesa Industrial Plan

    August 22, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Planning & Development

    383-Unit Multifamily Project Recommended by Goodyear P&Z

    August 22, 20250

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX The Goodyear Planning and Zoning Commission voted last week to…

    Aviation Training Center Planned for Mesa-Gateway Airport

    August 22, 2025

    Magazine Tackles Construction Crisis by Inspiring Teen Girls to Enter Skilled Trades

    August 22, 2025

    Rezoning Recommended for 236KSF Mesa Industrial Plan

    August 22, 2025

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    383-Unit Multifamily Project Recommended by Goodyear P&Z

    August 22, 2025

    Aviation Training Center Planned for Mesa-Gateway Airport

    August 22, 2025

    Magazine Tackles Construction Crisis by Inspiring Teen Girls to Enter Skilled Trades

    August 22, 2025
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.