What's Hot

    Developer Proposing 83-Unit Condo Project in Flagstaff

    July 25, 2025

    BNSF Looks to Combine Plan Amendment, Rezoning in 1 County Hearing

    July 25, 2025

    GO Industrial Planning Car Storage Facility in Phoenix

    July 25, 2025
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [July 25, 2025] - Developer Proposing 83-Unit Condo Project in Flagstaff
    • [July 25, 2025] - BNSF Looks to Combine Plan Amendment, Rezoning in 1 County Hearing
    • [July 25, 2025] - GO Industrial Planning Car Storage Facility in Phoenix
    • [July 25, 2025] - Arizona Projects 07-25-25
    • [July 23, 2025] - Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal
    • [July 23, 2025] - Yuma P&Z Recommends Multifamily General Plan Amendment
    • [July 22, 2025] - Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June
    • [July 22, 2025] - Yavapai Board Enables Bid Process for Cornville Road Roundabout
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. Planning & Development
      3. Local News
      4. Classifieds
      5. Editorial Analysis
      6. Budgets & Funding
      7. Commercial Real Estate
      8. People on the Move
      9. Arizona Projects
      10. Legislation & Regulations
      11. Trends

      Developer Proposing 83-Unit Condo Project in Flagstaff

      July 25, 2025

      BNSF Looks to Combine Plan Amendment, Rezoning in 1 County Hearing

      July 25, 2025

      GO Industrial Planning Car Storage Facility in Phoenix

      July 25, 2025

      Yuma P&Z Recommends Multifamily General Plan Amendment

      July 23, 2025

      Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal

      July 23, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June

      July 22, 2025

      Scottsdale Report Shows Multifamily Pipeline Half of Common Estimate

      July 22, 2025

      Alleging Breaches, ZenniHome Closes NGS Operations

      July 21, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Legislation Would Effectively Strip NIMBYs of Referendum Tool

      February 11, 2025

      2025 Forecast Tries to Clarify an Uncertain Market

      February 7, 2025

      KOREPlex Buckeye Site Quietly Listed For Sale

      January 31, 2025

      Ariz. LIHTC to Sunset Under New Budget

      July 8, 2025

      State Government Shutdown Averted as Hobbs Signs Budget

      July 1, 2025

      Arterial Life Cycle Program Covers 20 Years of Street Development

      June 27, 2025

      $56M+ MAG Program will Enable $90M in Arterial Street Widening Projects

      June 24, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-22-25

      July 22, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-15-25

      July 15, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-08-25

      July 8, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-01-25

      July 1, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-22-25

      July 22, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-15-25

      July 15, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-08-25

      July 8, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-01-25

      July 1, 2025

      Arizona Projects 07-25-25

      July 25, 2025

      Arizona Projects 07-18-25

      July 18, 2025

      Arizona Projects 07-11-25

      July 11, 2025

      Arizona Projects 06-27-25

      June 27, 2025

      Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal

      July 23, 2025

      Alleging Breaches, ZenniHome Closes NGS Operations

      July 21, 2025

      Ariz. LIHTC to Sunset Under New Budget

      July 8, 2025

      Tax Bill Would Make LIHTC Permanent

      July 2, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June

      July 22, 2025

      BEX Updates Construction Sector Projections in Annual Mid-Year Update

      July 18, 2025

      Phoenix Industrial Sees First Vacancy Drop in Years; YoY Completions Drop 75%

      July 18, 2025

      Phoenix Construction Costs See 4.42% Q2 Annual Change

      July 15, 2025

      Developer Proposing 83-Unit Condo Project in Flagstaff

      July 25, 2025

      BNSF Looks to Combine Plan Amendment, Rezoning in 1 County Hearing

      July 25, 2025

      GO Industrial Planning Car Storage Facility in Phoenix

      July 25, 2025

      Arizona Projects 07-25-25

      July 25, 2025
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2025 Mid-Year Update
      • 2025 Industrial LMS
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    AZBEX
    Home » Legislation & Regulations » Company Claims Glendale Contract Rule Violation
    Legislation & Regulations

    Company Claims Glendale Contract Rule Violation

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffMarch 20, 2024No Comments4 Mins Read
    Credit: City of Glendale
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Rare Earth LLC has filed a lawsuit against the City of Glendale claiming the City violated its procurement rules when it awarded a bid to purchase a City-owned site by the Agua Fria River to a competing firm.

    Rare Earth, a Glendale-based mining and gravel company, alleges in a Maricopa County Superior Court complaint filed in November that Glendale set up its solicitation process to favor M.R. Tanner Construction’s bid for the 48-acre property between Glendale Avenue and Bethany Home Road over its submission.

    It also claims the terms of the contract between Tanner and Glendale do not follow those laid out in the bid request. Rare Earth is asking the Court to compel Glendale to perform the solicitation again.

    Glendale denies favoring Tanner and says both companies were given equal opportunities in the bidding process. The City has asked the Court to dismiss the claim and says it adhered to the local code.

    Tanner submitted a separate filing and noted Rare Earth’s offer was $2M, while Tanner’s was $4.75M.

    A key question comes down to whether both companies were held to the same rules and standards. Specifically, part of Glendale’s requirements was that the winning company fill in a hole and build berms at the location within a 90-day window.

    In its submission, Tanner claimed the timeline was unreasonable. The City later stipulated in its sale and purchase agreement that a 240-day extension was possible.

    Rare Earth claims it was not aware an extension was an option and that its bid was low because executing the required work within the 90-day timeline was an expensive undertaking.

    Glendale says Rare Earth had the same opportunities as Tanner to express any concerns about terms and timelines.

    Rare Earth and its affiliate company ABC Sand and Rock had approached the City in 2019 about entering into a mineral lease, the lawsuit claims. Glendale declined the offer because the site was connected to the City’s groundwater recharge.

    The company made another request in 2020 for portions of the site not connected to the aquifer recharge and was again rejected.

    Tanner approached the City about buying the property in 2021. Rather than accept Tanner’s unsolicited offer, Glendale says it issued the invitation to bid. The City says Rare Earth’s earlier attempts to buy the property did not entitle it to preferential treatment.

    In August 2022, Glendale issued an invitation for bids for City-owned parcels. The solicitation included a requirement to fill in an 850-foot by 400-foot hole, bring it level with Glendale Avenue and build berms around the property.

    Glendale opened the bids in September 2022 and announced its intent to award the sale to Tanner two months later. Between January and April of 2023, Rare Earth’s lawyers contacted Glendale several times to ask about the status of the contract with Tanner. The lawsuit says it was seeking information relevant to some mining decisions for land adjacent to the parcel in the bid request.

    As of mid-May 2023, the City told Rare Earth it was still negotiating the contract with Tanner. Rare Earth filed a public records request for communications between Glendale and Tanner and claims the information in the eventual response indicates the contract terms are different from the bid. The complaint also cites exchanges between Assistant City Manager Jamsheed Mehta and Tanner staff regarding terms of the extension and bid selection.

    Rare Earth claims Tanner submitted its bid while knowing it could not complete the site work within the 90 window and accuses the City of working with Tanner to sell Tanner the property and reject Rare Earth’s bid. The company claims if it had been privy to the same terms and information as Tanner, it would have submitted a higher bid than Tanner’s $4.75M offer.

    The City also cites key differences between the companies’ bids. Specifically, Tanner offered a higher price and a construction plan for the improvements that indicated it would need more than 90 days to complete them. Rare Earth, meanwhile, offered a lower price and said it would hire a separate firm to complete the work within the specified time. Glendale says Rare Earth could have taken advantage of its equal opportunity but chose not to.

    Judge Timothy J. Ryan heard Glendale’s motion to dismiss the case in February but has not yet ruled. (Source)

    ABC Sand and Rock City of Glendale Jamsheed Mehta lawsuit litigation M.R. Tanner Construction Maricopa County Superior Court preferential treatment procurement rules Rare Earth LLC sale of city-owned land Timothy J. Ryan
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal

    July 23, 2025

    Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June

    July 22, 2025

    Scottsdale Report Shows Multifamily Pipeline Half of Common Estimate

    July 22, 2025

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Our Picks

    Developer Proposing 83-Unit Condo Project in Flagstaff

    July 25, 2025

    BNSF Looks to Combine Plan Amendment, Rezoning in 1 County Hearing

    July 25, 2025

    GO Industrial Planning Car Storage Facility in Phoenix

    July 25, 2025

    Arizona Projects 07-25-25

    July 25, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Planning & Development

    Developer Proposing 83-Unit Condo Project in Flagstaff

    July 25, 20250

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX Red Oak Development Group is planning to build an 83-unit…

    BNSF Looks to Combine Plan Amendment, Rezoning in 1 County Hearing

    July 25, 2025

    GO Industrial Planning Car Storage Facility in Phoenix

    July 25, 2025

    Arizona Projects 07-25-25

    July 25, 2025

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Developer Proposing 83-Unit Condo Project in Flagstaff

    July 25, 2025

    BNSF Looks to Combine Plan Amendment, Rezoning in 1 County Hearing

    July 25, 2025

    GO Industrial Planning Car Storage Facility in Phoenix

    July 25, 2025
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.