What's Hot

    Eloy P&Z Hears Dual Requests for Major Land Use Overhaul

    August 1, 2025

    State’s Largest Data Center Project Part of Vermaland Pinal Plan

    August 1, 2025

    Pinal Considering 215-Acre Data Center Development

    August 1, 2025
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [August 1, 2025] - Eloy P&Z Hears Dual Requests for Major Land Use Overhaul
    • [August 1, 2025] - State’s Largest Data Center Project Part of Vermaland Pinal Plan
    • [August 1, 2025] - Pinal Considering 215-Acre Data Center Development
    • [August 1, 2025] - Hundred-Unit Skyline Towns Townhome Development Moves Forward in Apache Junction
    • [August 1, 2025] - Arizona Projects 08-01-25
    • [July 29, 2025] - Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request
    • [July 29, 2025] - Dominium Planning 304-Unit BTR in Surprise
    • [July 29, 2025] - Next Steps Coming for Bartlett Dam Expansion
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. Planning & Development
      3. Local News
      4. Classifieds
      5. Editorial Analysis
      6. Budgets & Funding
      7. Commercial Real Estate
      8. People on the Move
      9. Arizona Projects
      10. Legislation & Regulations
      11. Trends

      Eloy P&Z Hears Dual Requests for Major Land Use Overhaul

      August 1, 2025

      State’s Largest Data Center Project Part of Vermaland Pinal Plan

      August 1, 2025

      Pinal Considering 215-Acre Data Center Development

      August 1, 2025

      Hundred-Unit Skyline Towns Townhome Development Moves Forward in Apache Junction

      August 1, 2025

      Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal

      July 23, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June

      July 22, 2025

      Scottsdale Report Shows Multifamily Pipeline Half of Common Estimate

      July 22, 2025

      Alleging Breaches, ZenniHome Closes NGS Operations

      July 21, 2025

      Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request

      July 29, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Legislation Would Effectively Strip NIMBYs of Referendum Tool

      February 11, 2025

      2025 Forecast Tries to Clarify an Uncertain Market

      February 7, 2025

      Ariz. LIHTC to Sunset Under New Budget

      July 8, 2025

      State Government Shutdown Averted as Hobbs Signs Budget

      July 1, 2025

      Arterial Life Cycle Program Covers 20 Years of Street Development

      June 27, 2025

      $56M+ MAG Program will Enable $90M in Arterial Street Widening Projects

      June 24, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-29-25

      July 29, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-22-25

      July 22, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-15-25

      July 15, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-08-25

      July 8, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-29-25

      July 29, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-22-25

      July 22, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-15-25

      July 15, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-08-25

      July 8, 2025

      Arizona Projects 08-01-25

      August 1, 2025

      Arizona Projects 07-25-25

      July 25, 2025

      Arizona Projects 07-18-25

      July 18, 2025

      Arizona Projects 07-11-25

      July 11, 2025

      Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal

      July 23, 2025

      Alleging Breaches, ZenniHome Closes NGS Operations

      July 21, 2025

      Ariz. LIHTC to Sunset Under New Budget

      July 8, 2025

      Tax Bill Would Make LIHTC Permanent

      July 2, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June

      July 22, 2025

      BEX Updates Construction Sector Projections in Annual Mid-Year Update

      July 18, 2025

      Phoenix Industrial Sees First Vacancy Drop in Years; YoY Completions Drop 75%

      July 18, 2025

      Phoenix Construction Costs See 4.42% Q2 Annual Change

      July 15, 2025

      Eloy P&Z Hears Dual Requests for Major Land Use Overhaul

      August 1, 2025

      State’s Largest Data Center Project Part of Vermaland Pinal Plan

      August 1, 2025

      Pinal Considering 215-Acre Data Center Development

      August 1, 2025

      Hundred-Unit Skyline Towns Townhome Development Moves Forward in Apache Junction

      August 1, 2025
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2025 Mid-Year Update
      • 2025 Industrial LMS
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    • CIP Special Report
    AZBEX
    Home » Legislation & Regulations » K12 Procurement Changes Coming Courtesy of SUSD
    Legislation & Regulations

    K12 Procurement Changes Coming Courtesy of SUSD

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffJune 9, 2018No Comments7 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    By Rebekah Morris for Arizona Builder’s Exchange

    Last month the Red for Ed budget bill caught the local building industry completely off-guard when it included a last-minute amendment that has far-reaching impacts on public K12 procurements. (AZBEX, May 8th)

    This week I had the opportunity to sit down with the Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, JD Mesnard to discuss the impacts and origins of the amendment. He explained that the amendment, and the legislative arm in general, are very reactionary bodies, stating “There is a growing sentiment among legislators that the egregious procurement violations by Scottsdale (Unified School District) are not isolated, and that they will continue if we don’t do something.”

    The amendment can be found here; the specific sections impacting procurements start at the bottom of page 5. Speaker Mesnard admitted that the amendment was brought forward in the last-minute chaos of passing the State budget, during the Red for Ed movement which saw tens of thousands of teachers march on the Capitol protesting low teacher pay. When asked if the industry was consulted about the language of the amendment, he admitted no, the voices he heard from objecting to it first were individual school districts. According to industry representatives, the amendment saw only 2:40 minutes of debate prior to passage.

    How does the Amendment Compare to Existing Statute?

    The jolt comes from the requirement to ‘award to the lowest qualified bidder’. That could mean either all Alternative Projects Delivery Methods contract types: CMAR, JOC, and Design-Build are eliminated, or the use of them must include a price component that determines the final award. It appears the existing two-step process of determining qualified firms proposing on a project might be able to meet that requirement, but the second step of considering price is the one that would ultimately determine the awardee.

    Imagine a scenario where 15 firms submit statements of qualifications; 12 are found qualified on a pass/fail basis, the firm is either qualified or not qualified to perform the scope of work. All 12 then submit a price proposal, with the lowest price proposal being selected.

    The State Board of Education rule making process will determine whether all APDM goes away or if any are still able to be used. It is entirely possible that all APDM will go away and construction will only be procured through a hard bid or design-bid-build process.

    It is unclear whether Architectural and Engineering services would be procured through a lowest price method. According to Speaker Mesnard, that will be determined by the SBE’s rule making process as well. He initially said, “yes, design services would be included,” but then deferred to the SBE for implementation. Arizona State Board of Education Executive Director Alicia Williams concurred that full implementation comes out of a rule making process.

    The effective date of the amendment is July 1, 2019, providing time for the SBE to solicit public input and proceed through the extensive rule making process outlined below.

    Comparing to existing statute, there are items to be resolved, but the amendment doesn’t appear to flat out conflict with anything aside from the new requirement to use the ‘lowest qualified bidder’. Below are highlights comparing existing statute to the new language.

    AZBEX NOTE: It is not our goal to identify every single impact, rather to bring forth highlights using simplified language that all our readers can understand. The amendment goes much further with impacts to the School Facilities Board and other educational programs that are specifically excluded from this discussion.

    Impact to Design Firms

    According to Katherine Dudzik Smith, AIA, AIA Arizona Government Affairs Chair, “At this time, there is no requirement that architectural or engineering services must be selected by lowest bidder in the new law; selection of professional services is defined elsewhere in existing Arizona law. However, this new law would affect any delivery method where the general contractor and the architect are under the same entity, such as Design-Build.”

    Typically, in the public procurement process, a design firm is selected first, then participates in the selection of the General Contractor, sitting on the selection committee. That specific action of being disallowed from sitting on the selection committee has always been an existing statute. That would not be the only impact to design firms if the amendment takes effect as written, requiring districts to use a design-bid-build procurement.

    In addition:

    • Design will most likely take longer and needs to be fully developed prior to procurement of the General Contractor. Gone would be the days of design-assist from specialty contractors, and constructability reviews by General Contractors. The onus for 100 percent designed documents would fall squarely in the lap of the Architect/Engineer of Record.
    • Prepare for litigation and claims to the Errors & Omissions E&O insurance policy. Low bid situations inherently increase the likelihood for claims and litigation by the Contractor. The design firm will be brought in to defend the quality of the documents over and over.

    Impact to Cooperative Purchasing Entities & Job-Order Contracts

    The requirement to use the lowest qualified bidder would impact existing cooperative contracts as well. During the due diligence process of the procurement, the cooperative has established the qualifications of contractors. Then, in theory, districts would be able to ‘bid’ the work to that list.

    Job Order Contracts are currently delivered one of two ways:

    1. Price list + modifier – the selected contractor and the owner establish the scope of the project together, select the appropriate line items from a price book (RS Means book or similar) and use the already negotiated price modifier to produce the cost of the individual project.
    2. Open-book or Mini-CMAR – the selected GC produces a Guaranteed Maximum Price based on subcontractor quotes, letting the market dictate the cost of the project.

    With the requirement to use the lowest bidder, delivering these JOC projects changes. During the initial contract negotiations, a low-price modifier can be the price determining factor. It is interesting to note that Arizona is the only state whose JOC legislation enables the open-book method. It’s unclear if the open-book or mini-CMAR method of JOC delivery would be able to continue.

    SBE Rule Making Process

    “The State Board of Education utilizes a rule making process prior to rule adoption by the Board. Typically, stakeholders are brought in to develop a draft rule. Then, that draft rule is presented to the Board, so that the Board can “open” the rule. Once a rule is open, Board staff collects public feedback on the draft rule.  There is also a public hearing on the rule. Board staff then updates the Board at a second meeting on the draft rule and will collect additional public comments prior to “closing” the rule at the third meeting. 

    “This process usually takes three Board meetings, or 60 days, because the Board wants to ensure that there is ample time and opportunities for the public to comment on the rule. The public can comment and provide input during each of the Board meetings, through the Board’s inbox and at the public hearings.”
    —Alicia Williams, Executive Director, State Board of Education.

    We anticipate the industry will strongly fight the requirement to use the lowest qualified bidder as an across the board requirement. In addition, school districts impacted enjoy a range of procurement tools that will be greatly diminished and will join together to combat this requirement.

    Obviously, we’ll continue to track this issue closely as the rule making process begins. We encourage you to get involved; whether you think this is a good idea or not, make your voice heard.  Attend the public meetings and provide comments during the public comment period.

    This is so important we want to get more information than what can be covered in written form. We want to ask questions of the right people who are involved in this process and top players in the market. To that end, we have reorganized our event programming and are bringing public K12 to the Leading Market Series monthly events on Thursday, July 12, 2018.

    Alternative Projects Delivery Method APDM design-bid-build job order contract JOC K-12 K12 legislation litigation low bid procurement School facilities board SFB state board of education; SBE
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal

    July 23, 2025

    Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June

    July 22, 2025

    Scottsdale Report Shows Multifamily Pipeline Half of Common Estimate

    July 22, 2025

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Our Picks

    Eloy P&Z Hears Dual Requests for Major Land Use Overhaul

    August 1, 2025

    State’s Largest Data Center Project Part of Vermaland Pinal Plan

    August 1, 2025

    Pinal Considering 215-Acre Data Center Development

    August 1, 2025

    Hundred-Unit Skyline Towns Townhome Development Moves Forward in Apache Junction

    August 1, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Planning & Development

    Eloy P&Z Hears Dual Requests for Major Land Use Overhaul

    August 1, 20250

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX In its July 16 meeting, the Eloy Planning and Zoning…

    State’s Largest Data Center Project Part of Vermaland Pinal Plan

    August 1, 2025

    Pinal Considering 215-Acre Data Center Development

    August 1, 2025

    Hundred-Unit Skyline Towns Townhome Development Moves Forward in Apache Junction

    August 1, 2025

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Eloy P&Z Hears Dual Requests for Major Land Use Overhaul

    August 1, 2025

    State’s Largest Data Center Project Part of Vermaland Pinal Plan

    August 1, 2025

    Pinal Considering 215-Acre Data Center Development

    August 1, 2025
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.