What's Hot

    Phoenix Seeking Rezoning for Latest 19th Ave. Area Redevelopment

    October 29, 2025

    Pinal P&Z Advances Energy Project for Data Center

    October 29, 2025

    Construction Workers Shifting Slightly Younger

    October 29, 2025
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [October 29, 2025] - Phoenix Seeking Rezoning for Latest 19th Ave. Area Redevelopment
    • [October 29, 2025] - Pinal P&Z Advances Energy Project for Data Center
    • [October 29, 2025] - Construction Workers Shifting Slightly Younger
    • [October 29, 2025] - Industry Professionals 10-28-25
    • [October 29, 2025] - Commercial Real Estate 10-28-25
    • [October 24, 2025] - $200M Advanced Automation Project Planned in Mesa
    • [October 24, 2025] - New Texas-to-Arizona Pipeline Planned
    • [October 24, 2025] - Diversified Partners Planning $50M Laveen Retail and Entertainment Center
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. ✎ Planning & Development
      3. 📰 Local News
      4. 🔎︎ Classifieds
      5. 🕵 Editorial Analysis
      6. 💰 Budgets & Funding
      7. 🏢 Commercial Real Estate
      8. 👔 People on the Move
      9. 🌵 Arizona Projects
      10. 🏛️ Legislation & Regulations
      11. 📈 Trends

      Phoenix Seeking Rezoning for Latest 19th Ave. Area Redevelopment

      October 29, 2025

      Pinal P&Z Advances Energy Project for Data Center

      October 29, 2025

      New Texas-to-Arizona Pipeline Planned

      October 24, 2025

      Diversified Partners Planning $50M Laveen Retail and Entertainment Center

      October 24, 2025

      Davis-Monthan Air Force Base Eligible for Private Data Center

      October 24, 2025

      Federal DBE Interim Final Ruling Impacts AZ Projects & Firms

      October 21, 2025

      ADAWS Marks Potential End of Two-Year Moratorium in West Valley

      October 12, 2025

      Peoria Eyeing Billion-Dollar Advanced Water Purification Facility

      October 8, 2025

      Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request

      July 29, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Legislation Would Effectively Strip NIMBYs of Referendum Tool

      February 11, 2025

      2025 Forecast Tries to Clarify an Uncertain Market

      February 7, 2025

      Early voting for Coconino Community College bond begins this week

      October 7, 2025

      Yuma Funding CIP Projects with $116M Bond Issuance

      September 24, 2025

      RTA Funding Proposal Stirs Controversy

      August 15, 2025

      Ariz. LIHTC to Sunset Under New Budget

      July 8, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 10-28-25

      October 29, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 10-21-25

      October 21, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 10-14-25

      October 16, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 10-07-25

      October 7, 2025

      Industry Professionals 10-28-25

      October 29, 2025

      Industry Professionals 10-21-25

      October 21, 2025

      Industry Professionals 10-14-25

      October 16, 2025

      Industry Professionals 10-07-25

      October 7, 2025

      Arizona Projects 10-24-25

      October 24, 2025

      Arizona Projects 10-17-25

      October 17, 2025

      157-Unit Moonlight Ridge Townhomes Proposed in Pinal County

      October 12, 2025

      Arizona Projects 10-10-25

      October 12, 2025

      U.S. Senate Advances Major Housing Legislation

      October 16, 2025

      TAAAZE Files Legal Complaint Against State of Arizona Over Senate Bill 1543

      October 1, 2025

      Scottsdale to File Notice of Claim Over Axon Bill

      September 16, 2025

      Environmentalists Sue ADWR Over Benson-Area Developments

      September 2, 2025

      Construction Workers Shifting Slightly Younger

      October 29, 2025

      Builder Sentiment Shows Marked Increase in October

      October 21, 2025

      Builder Sales Expectations Up, Sentiment Steady in September

      September 23, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Added 2,900 Jobs in August

      September 23, 2025

      Phoenix Seeking Rezoning for Latest 19th Ave. Area Redevelopment

      October 29, 2025

      Pinal P&Z Advances Energy Project for Data Center

      October 29, 2025

      Construction Workers Shifting Slightly Younger

      October 29, 2025

      Industry Professionals 10-28-25

      October 29, 2025
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Solicitations
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • DATABEX Log-In
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2025 Public Works Conference
      • 2025 Healthcare LMS
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    • CIP Special Report
    AZBEX
    Home » Budgets & Funding » Contractors Say Fed. Project Labor Rules Will Add Costs
    Budgets & Funding

    Contractors Say Fed. Project Labor Rules Will Add Costs

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffOctober 5, 2022No Comments3 Mins Read
    Credit: Phoenix Business Journal
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    By Associated Builders and Contractors

    According to a September 2022 survey of Associated Builders and Contractors contractor members, 98% oppose President Biden’s proposed rule mandating project labor agreements on federal construction projects of $35M or more. PLA schemes exclude almost nine out of 10 workers from participating in these contracts.

    “The overwhelming opposition to PLA mandates demonstrates that fair and open competition on federal and federally assisted infrastructure projects is a win-win for taxpayers and the U.S. economy because it ensures all Americans and qualified companies are welcome to fairly compete to rebuild America’s infrastructure,” said ABC VP of Regulatory, Labor and State Affairs Ben Brubeck. “In contrast, the Biden administration’s proposed rule requiring government mandated PLAs on federal contracts of $35M or more, and other policies promoting PLAs on federally assisted construction projects, will needlessly increase costs by 12% to 20% and reduce competition from quality contractors and the 87.4% of construction workers who freely choose not to join a union.”

    According to the survey:

    • 97% of survey respondents said a construction contract that required a PLA would be more expensive compared to a contract procured via free and open competition.
    • 99% said they were less likely to bid on a taxpayer-funded construction contract if the bid specifications required the winning firm to sign a PLA with labor unions.
    • 97% of respondents said that government-mandated PLAs decrease economy and efficiency in government contracting.
    • 96% expected a requirement to result in less competition from subcontractors.
    • 95% of survey respondents said the requirements of government-mandated PLAs for firms to contribute to union benefits programs harm employees and 96% said they undermine investments in workforce development programs.

    “Between 2009 and 2021, federal agencies mandated just 12 PLAs on 2,075 federal construction projects of $25M or more, illustrating that when given the option, PLA mandates are unnecessary on federal construction projects,” said Brubeck. “ABC members are top federal contractors – they were awarded 57% of the value of $127B worth of large-scale federal construction projects during this time period – but are needlessly excluded by the Biden administration’s policies promoting PLAs, which favor unionized contractors and labor.”

    The majority of survey respondents said PLA mandates would either result in construction projects that are less safe (65%) or have no impact on safety (34%). Three-quarters (75%) said PLAs would result in poorer quality or have no impact on quality (24%). Fully 85% said PLA mandates decrease the likelihood of completing a project on time and on budget, with 9% saying there would be no impact. 

    In addition, 94% of survey respondents said a PLA would result in worse local hiring outcomes for a project. Almost 69% of respondents agreed that a PLA would decrease the hiring of women, veteran and disadvantaged business enterprises and construction workers, which have traditionally been unaffiliated with labor unions, while another 27% of respondents felt that PLAs would have no effect in hiring these disadvantaged populations and contractors.

    The survey of ABC member contractors was conducted between Sept. 7 and 23 following the Biden administration’s Aug. 19 release of the Federal Acquisition Regulation Council’s proposed rule (FAR Case 2022-003, Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects RIN: 9000-AO40) implementing President Biden’s Feb. 4 Executive Order 14063.

    ABC and a coalition of construction industry, small business and taxpayer advocates strongly oppose the Obama and Biden administration’s pro-PLA policies and have  advocated for federal legislation, the Fair and Open Competition Act (S. 403/H.R. 1284), which prohibits government-mandated PLAs on federal and federally assisted projects.  (Source)

    ABC Associated Builders and Contractors Ben Brubeck Biden Administration Executive Order 14063 Federal Acquisition Regulation Council Federal policy labor rules Obama Administration PLA project labor agreements Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Federal DBE Interim Final Ruling Impacts AZ Projects & Firms

    October 21, 2025

    Early voting for Coconino Community College bond begins this week

    October 7, 2025

    Yuma Funding CIP Projects with $116M Bond Issuance

    September 24, 2025

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Our Picks

    Phoenix Seeking Rezoning for Latest 19th Ave. Area Redevelopment

    October 29, 2025

    Pinal P&Z Advances Energy Project for Data Center

    October 29, 2025

    Construction Workers Shifting Slightly Younger

    October 29, 2025

    Industry Professionals 10-28-25

    October 29, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Planning & Development

    Phoenix Seeking Rezoning for Latest 19th Ave. Area Redevelopment

    October 29, 20250

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX The Phoenix City Council is set to consider rezoning 12.4…

    Pinal P&Z Advances Energy Project for Data Center

    October 29, 2025

    Construction Workers Shifting Slightly Younger

    October 29, 2025

    Industry Professionals 10-28-25

    October 29, 2025

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Phoenix Seeking Rezoning for Latest 19th Ave. Area Redevelopment

    October 29, 2025

    Pinal P&Z Advances Energy Project for Data Center

    October 29, 2025

    Construction Workers Shifting Slightly Younger

    October 29, 2025
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.