What's Hot

    Eloy P&Z Hears Dual Requests for Major Land Use Overhaul

    August 1, 2025

    State’s Largest Data Center Project Part of Vermaland Pinal Plan

    August 1, 2025

    Pinal Considering 215-Acre Data Center Development

    August 1, 2025
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [August 1, 2025] - Eloy P&Z Hears Dual Requests for Major Land Use Overhaul
    • [August 1, 2025] - State’s Largest Data Center Project Part of Vermaland Pinal Plan
    • [August 1, 2025] - Pinal Considering 215-Acre Data Center Development
    • [August 1, 2025] - Hundred-Unit Skyline Towns Townhome Development Moves Forward in Apache Junction
    • [August 1, 2025] - Arizona Projects 08-01-25
    • [July 29, 2025] - Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request
    • [July 29, 2025] - Dominium Planning 304-Unit BTR in Surprise
    • [July 29, 2025] - Next Steps Coming for Bartlett Dam Expansion
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. Planning & Development
      3. Local News
      4. Classifieds
      5. Editorial Analysis
      6. Budgets & Funding
      7. Commercial Real Estate
      8. People on the Move
      9. Arizona Projects
      10. Legislation & Regulations
      11. Trends

      Eloy P&Z Hears Dual Requests for Major Land Use Overhaul

      August 1, 2025

      State’s Largest Data Center Project Part of Vermaland Pinal Plan

      August 1, 2025

      Pinal Considering 215-Acre Data Center Development

      August 1, 2025

      Hundred-Unit Skyline Towns Townhome Development Moves Forward in Apache Junction

      August 1, 2025

      Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal

      July 23, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June

      July 22, 2025

      Scottsdale Report Shows Multifamily Pipeline Half of Common Estimate

      July 22, 2025

      Alleging Breaches, ZenniHome Closes NGS Operations

      July 21, 2025

      Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request

      July 29, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Legislation Would Effectively Strip NIMBYs of Referendum Tool

      February 11, 2025

      2025 Forecast Tries to Clarify an Uncertain Market

      February 7, 2025

      Ariz. LIHTC to Sunset Under New Budget

      July 8, 2025

      State Government Shutdown Averted as Hobbs Signs Budget

      July 1, 2025

      Arterial Life Cycle Program Covers 20 Years of Street Development

      June 27, 2025

      $56M+ MAG Program will Enable $90M in Arterial Street Widening Projects

      June 24, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-29-25

      July 29, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-22-25

      July 22, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-15-25

      July 15, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-08-25

      July 8, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-29-25

      July 29, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-22-25

      July 22, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-15-25

      July 15, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-08-25

      July 8, 2025

      Arizona Projects 08-01-25

      August 1, 2025

      Arizona Projects 07-25-25

      July 25, 2025

      Arizona Projects 07-18-25

      July 18, 2025

      Arizona Projects 07-11-25

      July 11, 2025

      Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal

      July 23, 2025

      Alleging Breaches, ZenniHome Closes NGS Operations

      July 21, 2025

      Ariz. LIHTC to Sunset Under New Budget

      July 8, 2025

      Tax Bill Would Make LIHTC Permanent

      July 2, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June

      July 22, 2025

      BEX Updates Construction Sector Projections in Annual Mid-Year Update

      July 18, 2025

      Phoenix Industrial Sees First Vacancy Drop in Years; YoY Completions Drop 75%

      July 18, 2025

      Phoenix Construction Costs See 4.42% Q2 Annual Change

      July 15, 2025

      Eloy P&Z Hears Dual Requests for Major Land Use Overhaul

      August 1, 2025

      State’s Largest Data Center Project Part of Vermaland Pinal Plan

      August 1, 2025

      Pinal Considering 215-Acre Data Center Development

      August 1, 2025

      Hundred-Unit Skyline Towns Townhome Development Moves Forward in Apache Junction

      August 1, 2025
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2025 Mid-Year Update
      • 2025 Industrial LMS
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    • CIP Special Report
    AZBEX
    Home » Budgets & Funding » Contractors Say Fed. Project Labor Rules Will Add Costs
    Budgets & Funding

    Contractors Say Fed. Project Labor Rules Will Add Costs

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffOctober 5, 2022No Comments3 Mins Read
    Credit: Phoenix Business Journal
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    By Associated Builders and Contractors

    According to a September 2022 survey of Associated Builders and Contractors contractor members, 98% oppose President Biden’s proposed rule mandating project labor agreements on federal construction projects of $35M or more. PLA schemes exclude almost nine out of 10 workers from participating in these contracts.

    “The overwhelming opposition to PLA mandates demonstrates that fair and open competition on federal and federally assisted infrastructure projects is a win-win for taxpayers and the U.S. economy because it ensures all Americans and qualified companies are welcome to fairly compete to rebuild America’s infrastructure,” said ABC VP of Regulatory, Labor and State Affairs Ben Brubeck. “In contrast, the Biden administration’s proposed rule requiring government mandated PLAs on federal contracts of $35M or more, and other policies promoting PLAs on federally assisted construction projects, will needlessly increase costs by 12% to 20% and reduce competition from quality contractors and the 87.4% of construction workers who freely choose not to join a union.”

    According to the survey:

    • 97% of survey respondents said a construction contract that required a PLA would be more expensive compared to a contract procured via free and open competition.
    • 99% said they were less likely to bid on a taxpayer-funded construction contract if the bid specifications required the winning firm to sign a PLA with labor unions.
    • 97% of respondents said that government-mandated PLAs decrease economy and efficiency in government contracting.
    • 96% expected a requirement to result in less competition from subcontractors.
    • 95% of survey respondents said the requirements of government-mandated PLAs for firms to contribute to union benefits programs harm employees and 96% said they undermine investments in workforce development programs.

    “Between 2009 and 2021, federal agencies mandated just 12 PLAs on 2,075 federal construction projects of $25M or more, illustrating that when given the option, PLA mandates are unnecessary on federal construction projects,” said Brubeck. “ABC members are top federal contractors – they were awarded 57% of the value of $127B worth of large-scale federal construction projects during this time period – but are needlessly excluded by the Biden administration’s policies promoting PLAs, which favor unionized contractors and labor.”

    The majority of survey respondents said PLA mandates would either result in construction projects that are less safe (65%) or have no impact on safety (34%). Three-quarters (75%) said PLAs would result in poorer quality or have no impact on quality (24%). Fully 85% said PLA mandates decrease the likelihood of completing a project on time and on budget, with 9% saying there would be no impact. 

    In addition, 94% of survey respondents said a PLA would result in worse local hiring outcomes for a project. Almost 69% of respondents agreed that a PLA would decrease the hiring of women, veteran and disadvantaged business enterprises and construction workers, which have traditionally been unaffiliated with labor unions, while another 27% of respondents felt that PLAs would have no effect in hiring these disadvantaged populations and contractors.

    The survey of ABC member contractors was conducted between Sept. 7 and 23 following the Biden administration’s Aug. 19 release of the Federal Acquisition Regulation Council’s proposed rule (FAR Case 2022-003, Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects RIN: 9000-AO40) implementing President Biden’s Feb. 4 Executive Order 14063.

    ABC and a coalition of construction industry, small business and taxpayer advocates strongly oppose the Obama and Biden administration’s pro-PLA policies and have  advocated for federal legislation, the Fair and Open Competition Act (S. 403/H.R. 1284), which prohibits government-mandated PLAs on federal and federally assisted projects.  (Source)

    ABC Associated Builders and Contractors Ben Brubeck Biden Administration Executive Order 14063 Federal Acquisition Regulation Council Federal policy labor rules Obama Administration PLA project labor agreements Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Construction Hiring Remains Sluggish

    July 8, 2025

    Ariz. LIHTC to Sunset Under New Budget

    July 8, 2025

    State Government Shutdown Averted as Hobbs Signs Budget

    July 1, 2025

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Our Picks

    Eloy P&Z Hears Dual Requests for Major Land Use Overhaul

    August 1, 2025

    State’s Largest Data Center Project Part of Vermaland Pinal Plan

    August 1, 2025

    Pinal Considering 215-Acre Data Center Development

    August 1, 2025

    Hundred-Unit Skyline Towns Townhome Development Moves Forward in Apache Junction

    August 1, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Planning & Development

    Eloy P&Z Hears Dual Requests for Major Land Use Overhaul

    August 1, 20250

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX In its July 16 meeting, the Eloy Planning and Zoning…

    State’s Largest Data Center Project Part of Vermaland Pinal Plan

    August 1, 2025

    Pinal Considering 215-Acre Data Center Development

    August 1, 2025

    Hundred-Unit Skyline Towns Townhome Development Moves Forward in Apache Junction

    August 1, 2025

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Eloy P&Z Hears Dual Requests for Major Land Use Overhaul

    August 1, 2025

    State’s Largest Data Center Project Part of Vermaland Pinal Plan

    August 1, 2025

    Pinal Considering 215-Acre Data Center Development

    August 1, 2025
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.