What's Hot

    Split Vote Complicates Plans for VAI Resort

    May 28, 2025

    Safford Approves 165-Unit Multifamily Development

    May 28, 2025

    JDM Proposal Reimagines Biltmore Infill Project

    May 27, 2025
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [May 28, 2025] - Split Vote Complicates Plans for VAI Resort
    • [May 28, 2025] - Safford Approves 165-Unit Multifamily Development
    • [May 27, 2025] - JDM Proposal Reimagines Biltmore Infill Project
    • [May 27, 2025] - $500M Whiteriver Hospital Preparations Advancing
    • [May 27, 2025] - Peoria Council Approves $1.9B 10-Year CIP
    • [May 27, 2025] - Industry Professionals 05-27-25
    • [May 27, 2025] - Commercial Real Estate 05-27-25
    • [May 23, 2025] - Laveen Towne Center Plan Advances, Expands
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. Planning & Development
      3. Local News
      4. Classifieds
      5. Editorial Analysis
      6. Budgets & Funding
      7. Commercial Real Estate
      8. People on the Move
      9. Arizona Projects
      10. Legislation & Regulations
      11. Trends

      Split Vote Complicates Plans for VAI Resort

      May 28, 2025

      Safford Approves 165-Unit Multifamily Development

      May 28, 2025

      JDM Proposal Reimagines Biltmore Infill Project

      May 27, 2025

      $500M Whiteriver Hospital Preparations Advancing

      May 27, 2025

      EdgeCore 44-Acre Mesa Land Buy Sets Up Massive Expansion

      May 23, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Added 2,400 Jobs in April

      May 21, 2025

      Phoenix Considering Data Center Development Restrictions

      May 21, 2025

      City Engineers Stress Collaboration, Adaptability at BEX Public Projects Event

      May 16, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Legislation Would Effectively Strip NIMBYs of Referendum Tool

      February 11, 2025

      2025 Forecast Tries to Clarify an Uncertain Market

      February 7, 2025

      KOREPlex Buckeye Site Quietly Listed For Sale

      January 31, 2025

      Peoria Council Approves $1.9B 10-Year CIP

      May 27, 2025

      Scottsdale Water Needs $50M for ‘Toilet to Taps’

      May 9, 2025

      Phoenix Releases $11.5B, 5-Year CIP with Nearly 1,000 Projects

      April 1, 2025

      Buckeye Starts Planning Bond Funding Outlays

      February 26, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 05-27-25

      May 27, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 05-20-25

      May 21, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 05-13-25

      May 13, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 05-06-25

      May 6, 2025

      Industry Professionals 05-27-25

      May 27, 2025

      Industry Professionals 05-20-25

      May 21, 2025

      Industry Professionals 05-13-25

      May 13, 2025

      Industry Professionals 05-06-25

      May 6, 2025

      Arizona Projects 05-23-25

      May 23, 2025

      Arizona Projects 05-16-25

      May 16, 2025

      Arizona Projects 05-09-25

      May 9, 2025

      Arizona Projects 05-02-25

      May 2, 2025

      Phoenix Considering Data Center Development Restrictions

      May 21, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Executive Order Will Streamline Federal Acquisition Regulations System

      April 26, 2025

      Legislation to Save Axon Plan Continues to Advance

      April 16, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Added 2,400 Jobs in April

      May 21, 2025

      Backlogs, Confidence Increase in April

      May 16, 2025

      Multifamily Developer Confidence Down in Q1

      May 13, 2025

      U.S. Construction Added 11,000 Jobs in April

      May 6, 2025

      Split Vote Complicates Plans for VAI Resort

      May 28, 2025

      Safford Approves 165-Unit Multifamily Development

      May 28, 2025

      JDM Proposal Reimagines Biltmore Infill Project

      May 27, 2025

      $500M Whiteriver Hospital Preparations Advancing

      May 27, 2025
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • Housing Projects on the Horizon
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    AZBEX
    Home » Planning & Development » Axon Indefinitely Tables Scottsdale Campus Requests
    Planning & Development

    Axon Indefinitely Tables Scottsdale Campus Requests

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffFebruary 21, 2024No Comments7 Mins Read
    Axon’s planned corporate headquarters. Credit: SmithGroup/City of Scottsdale
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX

    Axon Enterprise Inc. requested and was granted a continuance to a “to be determined” date for its hearing before the Scottsdale Planning Commission to evaluate its proposal for a mixed-use headquarters, residential and commercial campus on 74 acres at Hayden Road and the Loop 101 freeway.

    Local news outlets report the plans were scheduled for the Commission’s Feb. 14 meeting, having previously been continued from Jan. 24. A scheduled Feb. 6 meeting before the City Council was also continued indefinitely.

    At issue is Axon’s plan to build a new corporate headquarters and supporting campus. The company bought the property at an Arizona State Land Department auction in 2020 for $49.1M.

    The 401KSF headquarters building is planned for the eastern portion of the site and has already been approved. Problems arose, however, when the company expanded its plan to include a total of 1.57MSF of uses that feature the headquarters and five multifamily buildings totaling 1,975 units, a 425-room hotel and more than 47KSF of commercial use.

    Opposition Dug in Quickly

    The updated plan immediately drew opposition from residents in the nearby Stonebrook II neighborhood, who claim the development would destroy the character of the area and of Scottsdale, itself, while also creating stark increases in traffic, crime and other negative impacts. Last September, a “whistleblower” disclosure from a rival in real estate development marketing informed officials that an existing agreement prohibited residential uses on the site. Axon has since sought the appropriate permissions to allow the use, but opposition has become entrenched.

    In a Feb. 7 letter to the editor published by The Arizona Republic, Stonebrook II HOA President Susan McGarry wrote:

    We are not opposed to Taser-manufacturer Axon or its already approved new headquarters. We value our Arizona-based businesses and residents who are here because they want to be here.

    But we should not have to sacrifice the character of Scottsdale, its neighborhoods or revenues for public schools to keep Axon or any other business here.

    We are the single-family home community that would suffer most from this rezoning. Our property values would plummet, we would lose the quiet enjoyment of our homes and apartment dwellers would peer into our living rooms and bedrooms.

    These are standard claims made by development opponents, and many have been categorically refuted over the last 40 years. Chief among them is the assertion that development diminishes property values. Precisely the opposite has been shown to be case, even if that development is as heavily vilified as traditionally designated affordable housing projects.

    A 2022 peer-reviewed study in the Journal of Housing Economics and publicized by the Council of Large Public Housing Authorities looked at 500 housing developments from 1997-2006 that used Low-Income Housing Tax Credits and examined their impacts on more than 600,000 nearby residential property sales based on property assessments and sales tax records. The study found surrounding home prices increased by 10%.

    It must be noted here that Axon’s proposal does not in any way include or even reference low-income or affordably designated housing.

    To our knowledge, no direct studies exist showing the impacts of high-end mixed-use developments, but it is reasonable to infer if LIHTC housing raises nearby residential property values by 10% by bringing new commercial and service outlets to an area, luxury housing, corporate headquarters and supporting uses could have as great or greater positive benefits.

    Still, paraphrasing one area city councilmember’s comments at a conference last year, “No amount of facts are able to sway the minds of opponents.”

    Axon Faced Process Challenges from the Start

    In January, the Scottsdale Airport Advisory Commission unanimously voted against recommending the Axon proposal.

    The company also fared badly at the January Planning Commission meeting. The meeting was heavily attended by opponents, and project representatives were peppered with questions from Commissioners, particularly in regards to water usage and the plan’s general degree of detail, leading to the initial request for continuance.

    In addition to the Stonebrook residents’ hostility, the development has riled development opponents around the city, particularly those who routinely oppose multifamily plans. “Scottsdale EDGE,” an anonymously published email newsletter targeting nearly all forms of development, has included several items opposing the Axon proposal, frequently accusing the company of engaging in “a bait and switch” by adding the campus plan.

    Axon officials have said the supporting campus, particularly the residential component, is essential to attracting the volume and quality of additional workers the company will need to meet its expansion and quality goals. Another local report covered Axon Founder Rick Smith’s comments at the Jan. 24 meeting, during which he reiterated the company’s view on the need for the campus.

    Smith said, “Axon is proposing an expansion of its facilities into a true corporate campus including the approved world-class employment center and requested mixed-use component.

    “Attracting quality candidates for employment includes providing conveniently located housing and commercial amenities like restaurants and retail.”

    That same article called Smith’s closing comment, “a thinly veiled threat,” when he said, “If we don’t do it here, we’re going to continue to grow – we’ll just do it in Seattle, Atlanta.”

    That comment, along with Axon’s discussions with planning officials, neighborhood representatives and other “stakeholders” in the process, have led opponents to consistently start branding the company as a “bully.”

    Scottsdale EDGE has claimed the company wants the continuances until at least May, when the term of Commissioner Christian Serena ends. Serena has been a consistent opposition ally in challenging the Axon plan. The newsletter also reported on Feb. 16 that Serena notified the City Attorney’s office that “a member of ‘Axon’s leadership’ contacted his employer in an apparent attempt to influence his vote on the Axon case, according to Serena’s written statement.”

    Lastly, Scottsdale EDGE has been implying collusion between Axon and Banner Health, which also has a development plan facing opposition in the area, particularly from Stonebrook II residents and their homeowners’ association.

    Banner has proposed a four-phase medical center on 52 acres in the immediate vicinity of the proposed Axon campus. That plan has come under attack from service worker and firefighters’ unions. The Scottsdale Fire Fighters Association’s official line of opposition has said the area is already well-served by existing hospitals and that the facility would somehow add to a shortage of medical professionals and support staff, an argument supporters of the proposal have called “baffling.”

    In its Feb. 5 email, Scottsdale EDGE pointed out both companies have development plans they are trying to get approved and said, “…both are willing to throw their weight around.” They said, “The two have close ties,” adding, “It’s no coincidence that the chairman of Axon’s Board of Directors, Michael Garnreiter, also serves on Banner Health’s Board of Directors.”

    Beyond that, the message offered no specifics on how the two companies may have been working together to influence the outcome of their proposals.

    Be Careful What You Wish For

    At present, Axon has not publicly disclosed when it plans to bring its proposal back for consideration, nor have there been any reports we have been able to find to show the company is actively looking to relocate. Rick Smith has said he is a proud Arizonan, that Scottsdale is his favorite place, and that the planned location is the company’s definite preference.

    Still, economic realities have a way of overriding even the most deeply held sentiment when the growth of major publicly held companies are on the line. Development supporters have said for years the growing resistance to any kind of significant growth in Scottsdale will make developers think twice about relocating there, particularly when other Valley cities have shown much greater openness, even if they do have their own cadres of NIMBY sentiment to contend with.

    We have to assume, for the moment, Axon will continue to pursue its plans for north Scottsdale. If, however, the company ultimately fails to secure the supporting development it says is essential to its future plans, and if it decides to move to greener, more welcoming pastures elsewhere, the NIMBY/CAVE/BANANA contingent in Scottsdale will have only itself to blame, particularly if Axon’s decision starts a domino effect of decreasing growth and prestige for the city.

    apartments/condos Arizona State Land Department ASLD Axon Enterprise Inc. BANANAs Banner Health build absolutely nothing anywhere near anyone CAVE Christian Serena Citizens Against Virtually Everything commercial Council of Large Public Housing Authorities Healthcare Hospital Hotels/Resorts/Casinos Journal of Housing Economics LIHTC Low-Income Housing Tax Credits master plan multifamily NIMBY office Private Scottsdale Airport Advisory Commission Scottsdale City Attorney Scottsdale City Council Scottsdale Fire Fighters Association Scottsdale Planning Commission Stonebrook II Stonebrook II HOA Susan McGarry
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Split Vote Complicates Plans for VAI Resort

    May 28, 2025

    Safford Approves 165-Unit Multifamily Development

    May 28, 2025

    JDM Proposal Reimagines Biltmore Infill Project

    May 27, 2025

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Our Picks

    Split Vote Complicates Plans for VAI Resort

    May 28, 2025

    Safford Approves 165-Unit Multifamily Development

    May 28, 2025

    JDM Proposal Reimagines Biltmore Infill Project

    May 27, 2025

    $500M Whiteriver Hospital Preparations Advancing

    May 27, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Planning & Development

    Split Vote Complicates Plans for VAI Resort

    May 28, 20250

    By BEX Staff for AZBEX Unofficial election results show Glendale voters apparently casting a split…

    Safford Approves 165-Unit Multifamily Development

    May 28, 2025

    JDM Proposal Reimagines Biltmore Infill Project

    May 27, 2025

    $500M Whiteriver Hospital Preparations Advancing

    May 27, 2025

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Split Vote Complicates Plans for VAI Resort

    May 28, 2025

    Safford Approves 165-Unit Multifamily Development

    May 28, 2025

    JDM Proposal Reimagines Biltmore Infill Project

    May 27, 2025
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.