What's Hot

    Tempe DRC Recommends Approval for 72-Unit Live-Work Development

    September 12, 2025

    Input Prices Up 0.2% in August

    September 12, 2025

    Arizona Projects 09-12-25

    September 12, 2025
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [September 12, 2025] - Tempe DRC Recommends Approval for 72-Unit Live-Work Development
    • [September 12, 2025] - Input Prices Up 0.2% in August
    • [September 12, 2025] - Arizona Projects 09-12-25
    • [September 10, 2025] - Goodyear Seeking Developer for Ballpark Village Mixed-Use
    • [September 9, 2025] - Opus Group Planning 300KSF Industrial Park Near Sky Harbor
    • [September 9, 2025] - Multifamily Development Planned in Tucson’s Miracle Mile
    • [September 9, 2025] - Construction Employment Down for Third Straight Month
    • [September 9, 2025] - Industry Professionals 09-09-25
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. ✎ Planning & Development
      3. 📰 Local News
      4. 🔎︎ Classifieds
      5. 🕵 Editorial Analysis
      6. 💰 Budgets & Funding
      7. 🏢 Commercial Real Estate
      8. 👔 People on the Move
      9. 🌵 Arizona Projects
      10. 🏛️ Legislation & Regulations
      11. 📈 Trends

      Tempe DRC Recommends Approval for 72-Unit Live-Work Development

      September 12, 2025

      Goodyear Seeking Developer for Ballpark Village Mixed-Use

      September 10, 2025

      Opus Group Planning 300KSF Industrial Park Near Sky Harbor

      September 9, 2025

      Multifamily Development Planned in Tucson’s Miracle Mile

      September 9, 2025

      HonorHealth to Build on Former Amkor Site in Vistancia

      September 2, 2025

      Buckeye City Council Discusses Annexing Land for Community Master Plan

      August 29, 2025

      Round 3 of BuildItAZ Grants Announced

      August 26, 2025

      Magazine Tackles Construction Crisis by Inspiring Teen Girls to Enter Skilled Trades

      August 22, 2025

      Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request

      July 29, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Legislation Would Effectively Strip NIMBYs of Referendum Tool

      February 11, 2025

      2025 Forecast Tries to Clarify an Uncertain Market

      February 7, 2025

      RTA Funding Proposal Stirs Controversy

      August 15, 2025

      Ariz. LIHTC to Sunset Under New Budget

      July 8, 2025

      State Government Shutdown Averted as Hobbs Signs Budget

      July 1, 2025

      Arterial Life Cycle Program Covers 20 Years of Street Development

      June 27, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 09-09-25

      September 9, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 09-02-25

      September 2, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 08-26-25

      August 26, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 08-19-25

      August 19, 2025

      Industry Professionals 09-09-25

      September 9, 2025

      Industry Professionals 09-02-25

      September 2, 2025

      Industry Professionals 08-26-25

      August 26, 2025

      Industry Professionals 08-19-25

      August 19, 2025

      Arizona Projects 09-12-25

      September 12, 2025

      Arizona Projects 09-05-25

      September 5, 2025

      Arizona Projects 08-29-25

      August 29, 2025

      Arizona Projects 08-22-25

      August 22, 2025

      Environmentalists Sue ADWR Over Benson-Area Developments

      September 2, 2025

      Pima County Latest to Amend Zoning for Data Centers

      August 22, 2025

      Tucson City Council Likely to Approve Water Restriction on Large

      August 19, 2025

      Ritz-Carlton Paradise Valley Fight Could End in Foreclosure

      August 15, 2025

      Input Prices Up 0.2% in August

      September 12, 2025

      Construction Employment Down for Third Straight Month

      September 9, 2025

      Construction Job Openings Up 77,000 YoY

      September 5, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Lost 400 Jobs in July

      August 19, 2025

      Tempe DRC Recommends Approval for 72-Unit Live-Work Development

      September 12, 2025

      Input Prices Up 0.2% in August

      September 12, 2025

      Arizona Projects 09-12-25

      September 12, 2025

      Goodyear Seeking Developer for Ballpark Village Mixed-Use

      September 10, 2025
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Solicitations
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • DATABEX Log-In
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2025 Hospitality LMS
      • 2025 Public Works Conference
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    • CIP Special Report
    AZBEX
    Home » Planning & Development » Revised TEP Line Project Remains Controversial
    Planning & Development

    Revised TEP Line Project Remains Controversial

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffNovember 8, 2023No Comments3 Mins Read
    Credit: Tucson Electric Power
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Even after the withdrawal and extensive revision of its former Kino to DeMoss Petrie Transmission Project, Tucson Electric Power’s replacement plan continues to draw heavy opposition and is generating legal wrangling.

    Now known as the Midtown Reliability Project, TEP’s proposal calls for a 138-kilovolt line running from a substation at Kino Parkway and 36th Street, past the University of Arizona to the DeMoss Petrie substation near Grant Road and Interstate 10.

    The key difference between the old and updated projects is the Midtown Reliability Project starts without the line segments proposed in the original.

    The points of opposition to the new proposal largely mirror opposition to the previous one. City officials and neighborhood groups do not want new lines and power poles with heights up to 110 feet. The route runs through or near some of Tucson’s historic neighborhoods. Opponents want the lines buried underground, just as they did with the original Kino to DeMoss-Petrie Transmission Line plan. TEP claims that would raise costs by as much as $80M and that it would be inappropriate to spread that cost across the entirety of the ratepayer base.

    Last May, Tucson voters rejected a ballot measure for a new TEP city franchise agreement that would have included a fee for funding the underground installation.

    TEP has also lost a case before the Tucson Zoning Examiner requesting a variance to build the substation needed for the new distribution plan.

    The utility says the new and upgraded line is essential to meeting the power needs of UA and the midtown area. It contacted 100,000 residents, 62 neighborhoods and an assortment of government officials to attend an open house in September. Roughly 125 people attended. Another open house is planned for Nov. 16.

    TEP is looking at several issues that have to be addressed to secure a recommendation from the Arizona Power Plant and Transmission Line Siting Committee and final approval by the Arizona Corporation Commission.

    Project representatives say installing the 138kv project will let TEP remove large amounts of the poles and equipment used in the current 46kv system. Some pieces would remain, however.

    The Jefferson Park neighborhood association wants the planned substation moved away from residential areas. Other neighborhood groups, and some City officials, decry the plan’s impacts on historical integrity and overall aesthetics in the installation areas.

    Along with the arguments about necessity and practicality versus historic and quality of life considerations, there also has been considerable legal back-and-forth. In the Oct. 25 Board of Adjustment meeting TEP ultimately lost, the utility’s lawyers argued the City had established a precedent by allowing overhead lines in other scenic and gateway corridors and that two City officials had said in emails no special requirements would need to be met for the substation since the project is an upgrade and not a new facility.

    TEP’s attorneys also referenced a Corporation Commission rule change that says the Commission doesn’t have jurisdiction over undergrounding but noted utilities generally avoid the practice for cost reasons unless there are safety or reliability issues.

    Tucson’s lawyer told the Board the City had the ability to preserve its rights-of-way and that the staff communications TEP referenced were informal, not binding.

    Though TEP has expressed disappointment at the Board’s decision and the ruling from the Zoning Administrator, it says it continues to evaluate its options. (Source)

    Arizona Corporation Commission Arizona Power Plant and Transmission Line Siting Committee dry utilities Kino to DeMoss Petrie Transmission Project power lines Private TEP Tucson Electric Power Tucson Zoning Examiner Utilities
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Tempe DRC Recommends Approval for 72-Unit Live-Work Development

    September 12, 2025

    Goodyear Seeking Developer for Ballpark Village Mixed-Use

    September 10, 2025

    Opus Group Planning 300KSF Industrial Park Near Sky Harbor

    September 9, 2025

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Our Picks

    Tempe DRC Recommends Approval for 72-Unit Live-Work Development

    September 12, 2025

    Input Prices Up 0.2% in August

    September 12, 2025

    Arizona Projects 09-12-25

    September 12, 2025

    Goodyear Seeking Developer for Ballpark Village Mixed-Use

    September 10, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Planning & Development

    Tempe DRC Recommends Approval for 72-Unit Live-Work Development

    September 12, 20250

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX The Tempe Development Review Commission earlier this week recommended approval…

    Input Prices Up 0.2% in August

    September 12, 2025

    Arizona Projects 09-12-25

    September 12, 2025

    Goodyear Seeking Developer for Ballpark Village Mixed-Use

    September 10, 2025

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Tempe DRC Recommends Approval for 72-Unit Live-Work Development

    September 12, 2025

    Input Prices Up 0.2% in August

    September 12, 2025

    Arizona Projects 09-12-25

    September 12, 2025
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.