What's Hot

    Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal

    July 23, 2025

    Yuma P&Z Recommends Multifamily General Plan Amendment

    July 23, 2025

    Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June

    July 22, 2025
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [July 23, 2025] - Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal
    • [July 23, 2025] - Yuma P&Z Recommends Multifamily General Plan Amendment
    • [July 22, 2025] - Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June
    • [July 22, 2025] - Yavapai Board Enables Bid Process for Cornville Road Roundabout
    • [July 22, 2025] - Scottsdale Report Shows Multifamily Pipeline Half of Common Estimate
    • [July 22, 2025] - Industry Professionals 07-22-25
    • [July 22, 2025] - Commercial Real Estate 07-22-25
    • [July 21, 2025] - Alleging Breaches, ZenniHome Closes NGS Operations
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. Planning & Development
      3. Local News
      4. Classifieds
      5. Editorial Analysis
      6. Budgets & Funding
      7. Commercial Real Estate
      8. People on the Move
      9. Arizona Projects
      10. Legislation & Regulations
      11. Trends

      Yuma P&Z Recommends Multifamily General Plan Amendment

      July 23, 2025

      Yavapai Board Enables Bid Process for Cornville Road Roundabout

      July 22, 2025

      Design Discussed for 45KSF Mesa Warehouse Plan

      July 18, 2025

      Potato Barn to Round Out Mesa Site with 48KSF Warehouse

      July 18, 2025

      Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal

      July 23, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June

      July 22, 2025

      Scottsdale Report Shows Multifamily Pipeline Half of Common Estimate

      July 22, 2025

      Alleging Breaches, ZenniHome Closes NGS Operations

      July 21, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Legislation Would Effectively Strip NIMBYs of Referendum Tool

      February 11, 2025

      2025 Forecast Tries to Clarify an Uncertain Market

      February 7, 2025

      KOREPlex Buckeye Site Quietly Listed For Sale

      January 31, 2025

      Ariz. LIHTC to Sunset Under New Budget

      July 8, 2025

      State Government Shutdown Averted as Hobbs Signs Budget

      July 1, 2025

      Arterial Life Cycle Program Covers 20 Years of Street Development

      June 27, 2025

      $56M+ MAG Program will Enable $90M in Arterial Street Widening Projects

      June 24, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-22-25

      July 22, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-15-25

      July 15, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-08-25

      July 8, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 07-01-25

      July 1, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-22-25

      July 22, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-15-25

      July 15, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-08-25

      July 8, 2025

      Industry Professionals 07-01-25

      July 1, 2025

      Arizona Projects 07-18-25

      July 18, 2025

      Arizona Projects 07-11-25

      July 11, 2025

      Arizona Projects 06-27-25

      June 27, 2025

      Arizona Projects 06-20-25

      June 20, 2025

      Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal

      July 23, 2025

      Alleging Breaches, ZenniHome Closes NGS Operations

      July 21, 2025

      Ariz. LIHTC to Sunset Under New Budget

      July 8, 2025

      Tax Bill Would Make LIHTC Permanent

      July 2, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June

      July 22, 2025

      BEX Updates Construction Sector Projections in Annual Midyear Update

      July 18, 2025

      Phoenix Industrial Sees First Vacancy Drop in Years; YoY Completions Drop 75%

      July 18, 2025

      Phoenix Construction Costs See 4.42% Q2 Annual Change

      July 15, 2025

      Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal

      July 23, 2025

      Yuma P&Z Recommends Multifamily General Plan Amendment

      July 23, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June

      July 22, 2025

      Yavapai Board Enables Bid Process for Cornville Road Roundabout

      July 22, 2025
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2025 Mid-Year Update
      • 2025 Industrial LMS
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    AZBEX
    Home » Planning & Development » 316 Units Proposed in Fountain Hills
    Planning & Development

    316 Units Proposed in Fountain Hills

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffDecember 8, 2023No Comments7 Mins Read
    Credit: Ayers Saint Gross/Town of Fountain Hills
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX

    On Dec. 11, the Town of Fountain Hills will have an opportunity to either cement or soften its reputation in the Arizona development community as one of, if not the, most challenging jurisdictions in which to build new multifamily communities.

    A 316-unit apartment proposal from Sandor Development—Village at Four Peaks—will go before the Planning and Zoning Commission for a hearing on a requested rezone from commercial and industrial uses to a Planned Area Development with underlying Multi-Family Zoning.

    The 6.7-acre property at the SEC of Shea Blvd. and Technology Drive is bounded by Shea and single-family homes to the north, industrial-zoned properties to the west and south, and the 29-acre Four Peaks Plaza commercial center—also known as the Target Center—to the east. The site lies within the commercial center and would be redeveloped for the multifamily project.

    The Target Center has been plagued by vacancy. The staff report accompanying the submittal says, “Although several businesses continue to operate throughout the center, a large portion of the plaza has remained vacant for several years, and some suites have remained unoccupied since they became available for lease in the early 2000s.”

    In summarizing the existing conditions, Town staff goes on to say, “The subject property is completely graded and gently slopes down toward the drainage channel to the north. The largest of the three lots within the subject property is 4.5 acres and contains a 40,000 (approx.) commercial pad building with a total of 13 commercial suites. Only two of these units are currently occupied by tenants, including the Dollar Tree and a nail salon, but the remaining units are vacant and have remained unoccupied over the past few years. There is also a 3,300 sq. ft. (approx.) vacant commercial pad building adjacent to the drainage channel along Shea Blvd., which is also adjacent to an unbuilt commercial parcel. Surface parking is provided for the subject property and is shared with the rest of Four Peaks Plaza to the east.”

    Sandor is proposing a complete redevelopment of the western side of the plaza to replace the existing, mostly vacant, retail space with a four-story residential community that will wrap around a parking structure, shielding the garage from public view. The architectural style is highly reminiscent of the Scottsdale Waterfront’s Mediterranean-inspired aesthetic and will feature soft earth tones and a desert color palate.

    The property has an irregular triangle shape, which limits its layout and development options, according to the submitted project narrative and requires “creative site planning.”

    “To address these site constraints,” the narrative says, “this PAD provides a framework for a more site appropriate design and building type, which will include highly efficient structured parking, wrapped by a residential building. Parking is not proposed under the buildings, which will maintain a lower overall building height. This approach results in less than 10% of the site area being devoted to surface parking, which provides overall benefits including reduced urban heat island.”

    The proposed site plan provides benefits beyond screened parking and efficient land use. Because of the layout and structuring and placement of the buildings, the site layout is planned for 25% open space, while the requirement only calls for 15%. As part of the site design, the proposal includes large landscaped areas around the building, as well as two interior courtyards for resident use.

    The overall density is proposed at 47 units/acre, with a configuration of 149 one-bedroom, 152 two-bedroom and 15 three-bedroom layouts. Unit sizes will range from approximately 760SF to 1,200SF.

    Jason Morris of Withey Morris Baugh said in a Dec. 5 interview that the Village at Four Peaks proposal offers obvious benefits to both the immediate area and the overall Fountain Hills community. The two primary benefits are replacing vacant retail with an active community, which will provide a built-in customer base for the remaining retail—particularly Target—and adding to both the availability and diversity of housing options in the town.

    Morris also acknowledged some of the historic challenges of developing in Fountain Hills, but he pointed out that if any proposal had built-in merit to justify its creation, it would be Village at Four Peaks. “This one has all of the elements you would want. It has none of the elements you would be concerned about,” he said.

    “Typically, when we’re going to a four-story building, the concerns are privacy, view corridors and/or traffic cutting through the neighborhood. This site has the benefit of its own signalized intersection. It’s not competing with neighborhood traffic. The shopping center itself is actually below the level of the roadway, so you’re able to get the impact of a three-story building as you stand on Shea Blvd., and it is not in any of the sightlines either looking into the neighborhood or looking out from the neighborhood.” He added that traffic volumes from the residential development would be less than if the site were fully occupied by commercial tenants.

    Morris went on to say, “If everything else were equal, that would be a compelling case, but in this instance, you add to that dynamic the benefit it has to the existing retail, namely Target. Target owns their building. This gives them an upgraded environment and creates residents who are undoubtedly going to be shoppers there.”

    Fountain Hills’ Legacy of Difficulty

    As we reported at length in June, however, a compelling and well-reasoned proposal does not necessarily equate to a smooth path to approval. While opposition to larger-scale multifamily development has become commonplace in nearly every jurisdiction, it can be considered part of the community fabric in Fountain Hills. (AZBEX, June 16)

    Put bluntly, Fountain Hills’ population is older, whiter and wealthier than most other communities in the state. It has a history of leaning toward single-family development almost exclusively and has a higher than average bent toward large-lot homes.

    Our research in June showed opposition to multifamily development in general, and dense multifamily in particular, has come to be considered a matter of course in Fountain Hills, to the point that many developers—both Arizona-based and national—have come to see the town as not worth the effort to propose new projects. This contributes both to Fountain Hills’ ongoing housing shortage and its stagnant population levels, which have not seen any appreciable growth in more than two decades.

    Sources close to both the current Village at Four Peaks development and the Senderos at Fountain Hills plan that was rejected in June have said vocal portions of the town’s residents and several officials have privately expressed opposition to enabling service workers and other residents who do not fit the perception of well-heeled and affluent citizens to be able to reside inside the town limits.

    In multiple presentations about NIMBYism and multifamily project resistance around the state, former Gilbert Mayor and current Horizon Strategies CEO Jenn Daniels has referred to the targeted populations as “those people,” as in “The existing community does not want ‘those people’ as their neighbors.”

    Interestingly, however, through two neighborhood meetings there has been little-to-no expressed opposition to the Village at Four Peaks proposal so far. Only three residents attended each meeting and, while there were questions about the project, no opposition was recorded after the presentations or during follow-up after the meetings.

    Only one letter of opposition has been submitted as part of the record going into next week’s Planning and Zoning meeting. A nearby industrial property owner said he has concerns about new residents potentially being impacted by the truck and other traffic from the nearby businesses.

    For his part, Morris expressed confidence in the case’s merits and guarded optimism about its chance for approval.

    “This is the rare case that is good for the landowner, good for the community, good for the neighborhood, good for the future residents and good for the bottom line of Fountain Hills,” he said.

    Sandor Development is the project owner. The design firm is Ayers Saint Gross. Kimley Horn is the engineer, and the project is represented by Withey Morris Baugh, PLC.

    apartments/condos Fountain Hills Fountain Hills Planning and Zoning Commission Four Peaks Plaza Horizon Strategies Jason Morris Jenn Daniels multifamily NIMBY Planning and Zoning Commission Private redevelopment Sandor Development Scottsdale Waterfront Senderos at Fountain Hills Target Center Town of Fountain Hills vacant retail Village at Four Peaks Withey Morris Baugh
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Yuma P&Z Recommends Multifamily General Plan Amendment

    July 23, 2025

    Yavapai Board Enables Bid Process for Cornville Road Roundabout

    July 22, 2025

    BEX Updates Construction Sector Projections in Annual Midyear Update

    July 18, 2025

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Our Picks

    Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal

    July 23, 2025

    Yuma P&Z Recommends Multifamily General Plan Amendment

    July 23, 2025

    Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June

    July 22, 2025

    Yavapai Board Enables Bid Process for Cornville Road Roundabout

    July 22, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Economic Development

    Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal

    July 23, 20250

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX By the time you read this column, Mohave County may…

    Yuma P&Z Recommends Multifamily General Plan Amendment

    July 23, 2025

    Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June

    July 22, 2025

    Yavapai Board Enables Bid Process for Cornville Road Roundabout

    July 22, 2025

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Mohave County May Remove Data Centers as Economic Development Goal

    July 23, 2025

    Yuma P&Z Recommends Multifamily General Plan Amendment

    July 23, 2025

    Ariz. Construction Gained 600 Jobs in June

    July 22, 2025
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.