What's Hot

    Major General Plan Amendments Requested for 1,800-acre Florence Area

    September 5, 2025

    Mesa Approves 29-Unit Townhome Plan

    September 5, 2025

    VanTrust Announces 1.1MSF Industrial Plan in Glendale

    September 5, 2025
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [September 5, 2025] - Major General Plan Amendments Requested for 1,800-acre Florence Area
    • [September 5, 2025] - Mesa Approves 29-Unit Townhome Plan
    • [September 5, 2025] - VanTrust Announces 1.1MSF Industrial Plan in Glendale
    • [September 5, 2025] - Construction Job Openings Up 77,000 YoY
    • [September 5, 2025] - Arizona Projects 09-05-25
    • [September 3, 2025] - TSMC Building Water Reclamation Plant
    • [September 3, 2025] - Pinal Airpark Gets OK, Funding for Air Traffic Tower
    • [September 2, 2025] - 336 Apartments Coming to Casa Grande Commons
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. Planning & Development
      3. Local News
      4. Classifieds
      5. Editorial Analysis
      6. Budgets & Funding
      7. Commercial Real Estate
      8. People on the Move
      9. Arizona Projects
      10. Legislation & Regulations
      11. Trends

      Major General Plan Amendments Requested for 1,800-acre Florence Area

      September 5, 2025

      Mesa Approves 29-Unit Townhome Plan

      September 5, 2025

      VanTrust Announces 1.1MSF Industrial Plan in Glendale

      September 5, 2025

      TSMC Building Water Reclamation Plant

      September 3, 2025

      HonorHealth to Build on Former Amkor Site in Vistancia

      September 2, 2025

      Buckeye City Council Discusses Annexing Land for Community Master Plan

      August 29, 2025

      Round 3 of BuildItAZ Grants Announced

      August 26, 2025

      Magazine Tackles Construction Crisis by Inspiring Teen Girls to Enter Skilled Trades

      August 22, 2025

      Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request

      July 29, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Legislation Would Effectively Strip NIMBYs of Referendum Tool

      February 11, 2025

      2025 Forecast Tries to Clarify an Uncertain Market

      February 7, 2025

      RTA Funding Proposal Stirs Controversy

      August 15, 2025

      Ariz. LIHTC to Sunset Under New Budget

      July 8, 2025

      State Government Shutdown Averted as Hobbs Signs Budget

      July 1, 2025

      Arterial Life Cycle Program Covers 20 Years of Street Development

      June 27, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 09-02-25

      September 2, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 08-26-25

      August 26, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 08-19-25

      August 19, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 08-12-25

      August 12, 2025

      Industry Professionals 09-02-25

      September 2, 2025

      Industry Professionals 08-26-25

      August 26, 2025

      Industry Professionals 08-19-25

      August 19, 2025

      Industry Professionals 08-12-25

      August 12, 2025

      Arizona Projects 09-05-25

      September 5, 2025

      Arizona Projects 08-29-25

      August 29, 2025

      Arizona Projects 08-22-25

      August 22, 2025

      Arizona Projects 08-15-25

      August 15, 2025

      Environmentalists Sue ADWR Over Benson-Area Developments

      September 2, 2025

      Pima County Latest to Amend Zoning for Data Centers

      August 22, 2025

      Tucson City Council Likely to Approve Water Restriction on Large

      August 19, 2025

      Ritz-Carlton Paradise Valley Fight Could End in Foreclosure

      August 15, 2025

      Construction Job Openings Up 77,000 YoY

      September 5, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Lost 400 Jobs in July

      August 19, 2025

      Experts Share on the Latest Industrial Trends at BEX Panel

      August 15, 2025

      Multifamily Developer Confidence Up in Q2

      August 12, 2025

      Major General Plan Amendments Requested for 1,800-acre Florence Area

      September 5, 2025

      Mesa Approves 29-Unit Townhome Plan

      September 5, 2025

      VanTrust Announces 1.1MSF Industrial Plan in Glendale

      September 5, 2025

      Construction Job Openings Up 77,000 YoY

      September 5, 2025
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Solicitations
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • DATABEX Log-In
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2025 Hospitality LMS
      • 2025 Public Works Conference
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    • CIP Special Report
    AZBEX
    Home » Legislation & Regulations » Hobbs’ Veto, Follow-up May Entrench NIMBYism
    Legislation & Regulations

    Hobbs’ Veto, Follow-up May Entrench NIMBYism

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffMarch 22, 2024No Comments7 Mins Read
    The Arizona State Capitol. Credit: Wikipedia
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX

    Here at AZBEX, we follow political news closely, but we try to keep ourselves above the fray. While these editorial analyses always have conclusions—and, sometimes, predictions—we try to base those on numeric data and long experience while steering clear of politics and opinion.

    Sometimes, however, things happen that require us to get down into the mud. Most often, this is because of a trend or series of events for which there isn’t much in the way of objective, numeric data and we’re forced, instead, to rely on our experience and familiarity with issues from having followed and reported on them for years.

    Now that the tone-setting preliminaries are out of the way, Gov. Katie Hobbs’ March 18 veto of House Bill 2570, the so-called “Starter Homes Act,” may well have killed the last, best chance for useful housing development reform in Arizona.

    As we discussed in the March 15 column, the bill impacted zoning and approval powers for cities with populations of 70,000 or more, including:

    • Minimum lot sizes would be set at 1,500 feet;
    • Setbacks from the street would be capped at no more than 10 feet;
    • Minimum distance between homes would be reduced to five feet at the backs or sides;
    • Cities could not impose specific architectural, design or aesthetic requirements; and
    • Developers could not be required by cities to institute homeowners associations in new developments. (AZBEX, March 15)

    While not universally supported in the legislature, it was one of the few truly bipartisan major bills to have emerged during Hobbs’ tenure as governor. It also had generally broad support with residents around the state, particularly since Arizona has gone from one of the most affordable places to live to one of the least in a fairly brief period of time.

    Veto Came After Hard Lobbying

    Hobbs has set a record pace for vetoed legislation. Former Gov. Janet Napolitano has the most vetoes, with 181 in her six years in office. Hobbs has vetoed 145 since taking office in 2023.

    That is, in a way, understandable. After Hobbs won the governorship in a heated race against a Republican challenger, the Republican-led Legislature sent her a raft of measures they knew she would oppose out of principle and policy. The relationship between the two branches started off strained and has remained so.

    On bills that were more complex or less partisan, Hobbs has developed a reputation for standing to the side for as long as possible. Supporters say the delays allow for careful study of the matter at hand. Opponents say it is a tactic to stay removed from controversy for as long as possible and to assess potential political risks.

    With HB 2570, Hobbs again waited several days before taking action. During that time, legislators who advocated for the bill lobbied for her signature both directly and in the media. Opponents, including the Neighborhood Coalition of Greater Phoenix and the League of Arizona Cities and Towns, did the same.

    Hobbs’ delay led to protracted news coverage, as reporters, pundits and advocates on both sides increased their discussions and focused on the, “Will she or won’t she?” question.

    In addition to the League’s organizational efforts to kill the bill, individual municipal and county leaders from around the state lobbied publicly and privately to secure a veto. In the end, they won out. When she finally executed her decision, Hobbs’ cited mayors’ arguments that the legislation was “too expansive,” and, “a step too far.”

    In discussing her reasons for the veto, Hobbs said, “This is unprecedented legislation that would put Arizonans at the center of a housing reform experiment with unclear outcomes. It lacks the nuance necessary for statewide reform.”

    History Says Otherwise

    Hobbs’ veto and the arguments from the League and mayors overlook the history of this type of legislation in recent years. HB 2570 was, in fact, comparatively timid and far more nuanced than its predecessors in the last two legislative sessions.

    In early 2022, Republican Arizona State Representative Steve Kaiser and co-sponsor Democratic State Representative César Chávez introduced HB 2674, a bill to preempt “local laws, ordinances and charter provisions” limiting residential development.

    That measure would have stripped local governments of their ability to reject residential development proposals almost entirely. (AZBEX, Feb. 8, 2022)

    Mayors and land use professionals were shocked and stunned, and opposition was immediate and vocal.

    Nearly as soon as it was proposed, HB 2674 was withdrawn. The bill was seen as a warning to cities to stem overreach into restricting housing development and to start a conversation on the matter. Nearly every municipality had seen an increase in NIMBYism leading up to the legislation, along with an increase in catering to the opposition contingent by local officials. HB 2674 was meant to put that segment on notice.

    While conversations certainly increased, the extreme nature of HB 2674 and its rapid withdrawal had an unintended consequence. It emboldened opponents who now felt they had beaten back a threat from the state level.

    Last year, after having moved from the House to the Senate, Kaiser introduced another housing process reform bill – SB 1117. That legislation was milder than HB 2674, but still contained extensive local process reforms. It failed to secure enough votes in the Senate to advance.

    Talking with AZBEX after the bill failed, local land use attorney Jason Morris of Withey Morris Baugh said the measure’s failure was a net positive, given its broad reach, but cautioned cities that changing their processes and allowing more housing development was essential.

    “At the end of the day, the state controls our zoning,” he said. “The cities don’t. So, if cities believe the status quo is acceptable, they’re going to be in a world of hurt in future legislative sessions. I anticipate that we will ultimately see some significant changes. We have to because the status quo is unacceptable in terms of land use.” (AZBEX, March 21, 2023)

    Cementing the Status Quo

    With HB 2570, this year’s effort was much more restrained. In arguing that this year’s legislation would strip municipalities of local control, both the mayors and Gov. Hobbs omitted any examination of recent history and ignored what has been shown to be a real appetite for reform in some circles.

    In vetoing the bill, Hobbs has also given a tacit endorsement of the status quo Morris warned about last year. The NIMBY contingent and their representatives have shown they can shut down even comparatively mild measures to restrain their attempts to strangle developments that check every box on the requirement lists under local code but that are found subjectively unpalatable by a minority of residents looking to halt change of any sort.

    In these pages, we have sometimes accused parties in various political debates of behaving like petulant children. Now that it has been proven there will likely be no comeuppance, the veto will likely embolden those childish voices. They have been warned over and over that if they don’t straighten up and act to increase housing supplies and improve affordability, there will be consequences.

    The veto says that the threat of consequence was merely a bluff.

    Adding what could be considered an insult to injury, Hobbs then stunned some observers by washing her hands of involvement in any next steps.

    The Governor told reporters she wants municipalities, zoning and housing process reform advocates, and others to work on solutions but added, “I don’t necessarily think it needs my involvement. They’re the ones most closely involved in this issue.”

    There are other potential pieces of legislation on the horizon, including some administrative process reforms and allowing casitas on single-family lots, that Hobbs has said she will consider signing if they’re passed and presented for her signature, but those comprise largely cosmetic reforms without any accompanying changes at a foundational level.

    What’s worse, there is now no real remaining threat or impediment to those hardcore opponents of change who view even the more modest reforms Hobbs has said she may consider as being an existential threat to their sacred status quo.

    Arizona Legislature César Chávez Editorial Gov. Janet Napolitano Gov. Katie Hobbs HB 2570 HB 2674 housing construction housing market Jason Morris League of Arizona Cities and Towns legislation Neighborhood Coalition of Greater Phoenix NIMBY NIMBYism SB 1117 Starter Homes Act Steve Kaiser trends Withey Morris Baugh
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Construction Job Openings Up 77,000 YoY

    September 5, 2025

    Environmentalists Sue ADWR Over Benson-Area Developments

    September 2, 2025

    Pima County Latest to Amend Zoning for Data Centers

    August 22, 2025

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Our Picks

    Major General Plan Amendments Requested for 1,800-acre Florence Area

    September 5, 2025

    Mesa Approves 29-Unit Townhome Plan

    September 5, 2025

    VanTrust Announces 1.1MSF Industrial Plan in Glendale

    September 5, 2025

    Construction Job Openings Up 77,000 YoY

    September 5, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Planning & Development

    Major General Plan Amendments Requested for 1,800-acre Florence Area

    September 5, 20250

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX The Florence Planning and Zoning Commission will hold the first…

    Mesa Approves 29-Unit Townhome Plan

    September 5, 2025

    VanTrust Announces 1.1MSF Industrial Plan in Glendale

    September 5, 2025

    Construction Job Openings Up 77,000 YoY

    September 5, 2025

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Major General Plan Amendments Requested for 1,800-acre Florence Area

    September 5, 2025

    Mesa Approves 29-Unit Townhome Plan

    September 5, 2025

    VanTrust Announces 1.1MSF Industrial Plan in Glendale

    September 5, 2025
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.