What's Hot

    MAG Committee Info Details Upcoming Pavement Plans

    June 20, 2025

    Bullhead Resort in Limbo After Continued No-Shows at Land Auction

    June 20, 2025

    Mesa Considering $6.36M in Tax Incentives for SimonCRE Development

    June 20, 2025
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [June 20, 2025] - MAG Committee Info Details Upcoming Pavement Plans
    • [June 20, 2025] - Bullhead Resort in Limbo After Continued No-Shows at Land Auction
    • [June 20, 2025] - Mesa Considering $6.36M in Tax Incentives for SimonCRE Development
    • [June 20, 2025] - Phoenix Delays Data Center Rezone Vote
    • [June 20, 2025] - Arizona Projects 06-20-25
    • [June 18, 2025] - More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions
    • [June 18, 2025] - Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan
    • [June 17, 2025] - MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. Planning & Development
      3. Local News
      4. Classifieds
      5. Editorial Analysis
      6. Budgets & Funding
      7. Commercial Real Estate
      8. People on the Move
      9. Arizona Projects
      10. Legislation & Regulations
      11. Trends

      Bullhead Resort in Limbo After Continued No-Shows at Land Auction

      June 20, 2025

      Mesa Considering $6.36M in Tax Incentives for SimonCRE Development

      June 20, 2025

      Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan

      June 18, 2025

      ASLD Seeks Rezone for 389 Acres in Pinal

      June 13, 2025

      MAG Committee Info Details Upcoming Pavement Plans

      June 20, 2025

      Phoenix Delays Data Center Rezone Vote

      June 20, 2025

      More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

      June 18, 2025

      MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

      June 17, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Legislation Would Effectively Strip NIMBYs of Referendum Tool

      February 11, 2025

      2025 Forecast Tries to Clarify an Uncertain Market

      February 7, 2025

      KOREPlex Buckeye Site Quietly Listed For Sale

      January 31, 2025

      MAG Committee Info Details Upcoming Pavement Plans

      June 20, 2025

      MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

      June 17, 2025

      Coconino Community College Issues $100M Bond Ballot Request

      June 17, 2025

      Pima BoS Approves $250M Affordable Housing Plan

      June 6, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 06-17-25

      June 17, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 06-10-25

      June 10, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 06-03-25

      June 3, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 05-27-25

      May 27, 2025

      Industry Professionals 06-17-25

      June 17, 2025

      Industry Professionals 06-10-25

      June 10, 2025

      Industry Professionals 06-03-25

      June 3, 2025

      Industry Professionals 05-27-25

      May 27, 2025

      Arizona Projects 06-20-25

      June 20, 2025

      Arizona Projects 06-13-25

      June 13, 2025

      Arizona Projects 06-06-25

      June 6, 2025

      Arizona Projects 05-30-25

      May 30, 2025

      Phoenix Delays Data Center Rezone Vote

      June 20, 2025

      More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

      June 18, 2025

      Phoenix Considering Data Center Development Restrictions

      May 21, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      NABH Council Partnership Wants to Expand Workforce Pipeline

      June 17, 2025

      Project Abandonments Hit a Record in May

      June 13, 2025

      U.S. Construction Added 4,000 Jobs in May

      June 10, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Added 2,400 Jobs in April

      May 21, 2025

      MAG Committee Info Details Upcoming Pavement Plans

      June 20, 2025

      Bullhead Resort in Limbo After Continued No-Shows at Land Auction

      June 20, 2025

      Mesa Considering $6.36M in Tax Incentives for SimonCRE Development

      June 20, 2025

      Phoenix Delays Data Center Rezone Vote

      June 20, 2025
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2025 Mid-Year Update
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    AZBEX
    Home » Budgets & Funding » Contractors Say Fed. Project Labor Rules Will Add Costs
    Budgets & Funding

    Contractors Say Fed. Project Labor Rules Will Add Costs

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffOctober 5, 2022No Comments3 Mins Read
    Credit: Phoenix Business Journal
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    By Associated Builders and Contractors

    According to a September 2022 survey of Associated Builders and Contractors contractor members, 98% oppose President Biden’s proposed rule mandating project labor agreements on federal construction projects of $35M or more. PLA schemes exclude almost nine out of 10 workers from participating in these contracts.

    “The overwhelming opposition to PLA mandates demonstrates that fair and open competition on federal and federally assisted infrastructure projects is a win-win for taxpayers and the U.S. economy because it ensures all Americans and qualified companies are welcome to fairly compete to rebuild America’s infrastructure,” said ABC VP of Regulatory, Labor and State Affairs Ben Brubeck. “In contrast, the Biden administration’s proposed rule requiring government mandated PLAs on federal contracts of $35M or more, and other policies promoting PLAs on federally assisted construction projects, will needlessly increase costs by 12% to 20% and reduce competition from quality contractors and the 87.4% of construction workers who freely choose not to join a union.”

    According to the survey:

    • 97% of survey respondents said a construction contract that required a PLA would be more expensive compared to a contract procured via free and open competition.
    • 99% said they were less likely to bid on a taxpayer-funded construction contract if the bid specifications required the winning firm to sign a PLA with labor unions.
    • 97% of respondents said that government-mandated PLAs decrease economy and efficiency in government contracting.
    • 96% expected a requirement to result in less competition from subcontractors.
    • 95% of survey respondents said the requirements of government-mandated PLAs for firms to contribute to union benefits programs harm employees and 96% said they undermine investments in workforce development programs.

    “Between 2009 and 2021, federal agencies mandated just 12 PLAs on 2,075 federal construction projects of $25M or more, illustrating that when given the option, PLA mandates are unnecessary on federal construction projects,” said Brubeck. “ABC members are top federal contractors – they were awarded 57% of the value of $127B worth of large-scale federal construction projects during this time period – but are needlessly excluded by the Biden administration’s policies promoting PLAs, which favor unionized contractors and labor.”

    The majority of survey respondents said PLA mandates would either result in construction projects that are less safe (65%) or have no impact on safety (34%). Three-quarters (75%) said PLAs would result in poorer quality or have no impact on quality (24%). Fully 85% said PLA mandates decrease the likelihood of completing a project on time and on budget, with 9% saying there would be no impact. 

    In addition, 94% of survey respondents said a PLA would result in worse local hiring outcomes for a project. Almost 69% of respondents agreed that a PLA would decrease the hiring of women, veteran and disadvantaged business enterprises and construction workers, which have traditionally been unaffiliated with labor unions, while another 27% of respondents felt that PLAs would have no effect in hiring these disadvantaged populations and contractors.

    The survey of ABC member contractors was conducted between Sept. 7 and 23 following the Biden administration’s Aug. 19 release of the Federal Acquisition Regulation Council’s proposed rule (FAR Case 2022-003, Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects RIN: 9000-AO40) implementing President Biden’s Feb. 4 Executive Order 14063.

    ABC and a coalition of construction industry, small business and taxpayer advocates strongly oppose the Obama and Biden administration’s pro-PLA policies and have  advocated for federal legislation, the Fair and Open Competition Act (S. 403/H.R. 1284), which prohibits government-mandated PLAs on federal and federally assisted projects.  (Source)

    ABC Associated Builders and Contractors Ben Brubeck Biden Administration Executive Order 14063 Federal Acquisition Regulation Council Federal policy labor rules Obama Administration PLA project labor agreements Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    MAG Committee Info Details Upcoming Pavement Plans

    June 20, 2025

    MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

    June 17, 2025

    Coconino Community College Issues $100M Bond Ballot Request

    June 17, 2025

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Our Picks

    MAG Committee Info Details Upcoming Pavement Plans

    June 20, 2025

    Bullhead Resort in Limbo After Continued No-Shows at Land Auction

    June 20, 2025

    Mesa Considering $6.36M in Tax Incentives for SimonCRE Development

    June 20, 2025

    Phoenix Delays Data Center Rezone Vote

    June 20, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Budgets & Funding

    MAG Committee Info Details Upcoming Pavement Plans

    June 20, 20250

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX In our June 17 issue, we examined the Maricopa Association…

    Bullhead Resort in Limbo After Continued No-Shows at Land Auction

    June 20, 2025

    Mesa Considering $6.36M in Tax Incentives for SimonCRE Development

    June 20, 2025

    Phoenix Delays Data Center Rezone Vote

    June 20, 2025

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    MAG Committee Info Details Upcoming Pavement Plans

    June 20, 2025

    Bullhead Resort in Limbo After Continued No-Shows at Land Auction

    June 20, 2025

    Mesa Considering $6.36M in Tax Incentives for SimonCRE Development

    June 20, 2025
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.