What's Hot

    More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

    June 18, 2025

    Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan

    June 18, 2025

    MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

    June 17, 2025
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [June 18, 2025] - More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions
    • [June 18, 2025] - Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan
    • [June 17, 2025] - MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans
    • [June 17, 2025] - Coconino Community College Issues $100M Bond Ballot Request
    • [June 17, 2025] - NABH Council Partnership Wants to Expand Workforce Pipeline
    • [June 17, 2025] - Industry Professionals 06-17-25
    • [June 17, 2025] - Commercial Real Estate 06-17-25
    • [June 13, 2025] - ASLD Seeks Rezone for 389 Acres in Pinal
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. Planning & Development
      3. Local News
      4. Classifieds
      5. Editorial Analysis
      6. Budgets & Funding
      7. Commercial Real Estate
      8. People on the Move
      9. Arizona Projects
      10. Legislation & Regulations
      11. Trends

      Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan

      June 18, 2025

      ASLD Seeks Rezone for 389 Acres in Pinal

      June 13, 2025

      Axon Withdraws Campus Concessions Due to ‘Toxic’ Scottsdale Council

      June 13, 2025

      Surprise, Peoria to Partner on Jomax Road Extension

      June 11, 2025

      More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

      June 18, 2025

      MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

      June 17, 2025

      NABH Council Partnership Wants to Expand Workforce Pipeline

      June 17, 2025

      Tolleson District Plans Could Yield New Developments

      June 11, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Legislation Would Effectively Strip NIMBYs of Referendum Tool

      February 11, 2025

      2025 Forecast Tries to Clarify an Uncertain Market

      February 7, 2025

      KOREPlex Buckeye Site Quietly Listed For Sale

      January 31, 2025

      MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

      June 17, 2025

      Coconino Community College Issues $100M Bond Ballot Request

      June 17, 2025

      Pima BoS Approves $250M Affordable Housing Plan

      June 6, 2025

      Peoria Council Approves $1.9B 10-Year CIP

      May 27, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 06-17-25

      June 17, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 06-10-25

      June 10, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 06-03-25

      June 3, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 05-27-25

      May 27, 2025

      Industry Professionals 06-17-25

      June 17, 2025

      Industry Professionals 06-10-25

      June 10, 2025

      Industry Professionals 06-03-25

      June 3, 2025

      Industry Professionals 05-27-25

      May 27, 2025

      Arizona Projects 06-13-25

      June 13, 2025

      Arizona Projects 06-06-25

      June 6, 2025

      Arizona Projects 05-30-25

      May 30, 2025

      Arizona Projects 05-23-25

      May 23, 2025

      More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

      June 18, 2025

      Phoenix Considering Data Center Development Restrictions

      May 21, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Executive Order Will Streamline Federal Acquisition Regulations System

      April 26, 2025

      NABH Council Partnership Wants to Expand Workforce Pipeline

      June 17, 2025

      Project Abandonments Hit a Record in May

      June 13, 2025

      U.S. Construction Added 4,000 Jobs in May

      June 10, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Added 2,400 Jobs in April

      May 21, 2025

      More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

      June 18, 2025

      Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan

      June 18, 2025

      MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

      June 17, 2025

      Coconino Community College Issues $100M Bond Ballot Request

      June 17, 2025
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2025 Mid-Year Update
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    AZBEX
    Home » Planning & Development » 92 Ironwood Returns as Mercado Courtyards
    Planning & Development

    92 Ironwood Returns as Mercado Courtyards

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffMay 18, 2022No Comments2 Mins Read
    Credit: DAVIS/City of Scottsdale/Scottsdale Progress
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Following a name change and 17 design changes, the 92 Ironwood apartment project came back before the Scottsdale Planning Commission last week as Mercado Courtyards.

    The original 92 Ironwood proposal was recommended by the Planning Commission last September but was one of three developments – along with Greenbelt 88 and District at 9400 Shea – to encounter orchestrated opposition from neighborhood groups opposed to higher-density multifamily development. The developer asked for and was granted a continuance by City Council but pulled the proposal in February when a second continuance was denied.

    The Commission may deny requests to consider an application if it is resubmitted less than one year after being withdrawn. After debating whether or not the newly submitted request constituted a new proposal, the Planning Commission ultimately voted unanimously to allow the application, saying it had sufficiently changed to be considered a new project.

    In addition to the name change, the developer has removed a proposed fourth floor on a building along 92nd Street, reduced the living space by 30.3KSF, and cut 40 units, bringing the total down to 273. Open space has been increased by 11KSF, bringing the total to 110.3KSF, and parking has been increased from 1.91 spaces/unit to 1.99.

    The plan has also secured the support of the McCormick Ranch Property Owners Association. The Association’s opposition was a key sticking point for the first submission.

    No members of the public spoke in opposition to the project.

    The new density on the 8.59-acre parcel of property is proposed at 31.8 units per acre.

    The Mercado Courtyards submission will still likely face a challenge in securing approval from the City Council. Under the updated general plan approved by voters last year, the highest density referenced is 25 units per acre. The new proposal has a density of 31.8 as currently planned. (Source)

    92 Ironwood apartments/condos density District at 9400 Shea Greenbelt 88 Mercado Courtyards multifamily neighborhood opposition NIMBY Private revised submission Scottsdale City Council Scottsdale General Plan Scottsdale Planning Commission
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

    June 18, 2025

    Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan

    June 18, 2025

    ASLD Seeks Rezone for 389 Acres in Pinal

    June 13, 2025

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Our Picks

    More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

    June 18, 2025

    Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan

    June 18, 2025

    MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

    June 17, 2025

    Coconino Community College Issues $100M Bond Ballot Request

    June 17, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Legislation & Regulations

    More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

    June 18, 20250

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX The City of Chandler probably didn’t expect to be a…

    Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan

    June 18, 2025

    MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

    June 17, 2025

    Coconino Community College Issues $100M Bond Ballot Request

    June 17, 2025

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

    June 18, 2025

    Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan

    June 18, 2025

    MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

    June 17, 2025
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.