What's Hot

    More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

    June 18, 2025

    Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan

    June 18, 2025

    MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

    June 17, 2025
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [June 18, 2025] - More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions
    • [June 18, 2025] - Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan
    • [June 17, 2025] - MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans
    • [June 17, 2025] - Coconino Community College Issues $100M Bond Ballot Request
    • [June 17, 2025] - NABH Council Partnership Wants to Expand Workforce Pipeline
    • [June 17, 2025] - Industry Professionals 06-17-25
    • [June 17, 2025] - Commercial Real Estate 06-17-25
    • [June 13, 2025] - ASLD Seeks Rezone for 389 Acres in Pinal
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. Planning & Development
      3. Local News
      4. Classifieds
      5. Editorial Analysis
      6. Budgets & Funding
      7. Commercial Real Estate
      8. People on the Move
      9. Arizona Projects
      10. Legislation & Regulations
      11. Trends

      Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan

      June 18, 2025

      ASLD Seeks Rezone for 389 Acres in Pinal

      June 13, 2025

      Axon Withdraws Campus Concessions Due to ‘Toxic’ Scottsdale Council

      June 13, 2025

      Surprise, Peoria to Partner on Jomax Road Extension

      June 11, 2025

      More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

      June 18, 2025

      MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

      June 17, 2025

      NABH Council Partnership Wants to Expand Workforce Pipeline

      June 17, 2025

      Tolleson District Plans Could Yield New Developments

      June 11, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Legislation Would Effectively Strip NIMBYs of Referendum Tool

      February 11, 2025

      2025 Forecast Tries to Clarify an Uncertain Market

      February 7, 2025

      KOREPlex Buckeye Site Quietly Listed For Sale

      January 31, 2025

      MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

      June 17, 2025

      Coconino Community College Issues $100M Bond Ballot Request

      June 17, 2025

      Pima BoS Approves $250M Affordable Housing Plan

      June 6, 2025

      Peoria Council Approves $1.9B 10-Year CIP

      May 27, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 06-17-25

      June 17, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 06-10-25

      June 10, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 06-03-25

      June 3, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 05-27-25

      May 27, 2025

      Industry Professionals 06-17-25

      June 17, 2025

      Industry Professionals 06-10-25

      June 10, 2025

      Industry Professionals 06-03-25

      June 3, 2025

      Industry Professionals 05-27-25

      May 27, 2025

      Arizona Projects 06-13-25

      June 13, 2025

      Arizona Projects 06-06-25

      June 6, 2025

      Arizona Projects 05-30-25

      May 30, 2025

      Arizona Projects 05-23-25

      May 23, 2025

      More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

      June 18, 2025

      Phoenix Considering Data Center Development Restrictions

      May 21, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Executive Order Will Streamline Federal Acquisition Regulations System

      April 26, 2025

      NABH Council Partnership Wants to Expand Workforce Pipeline

      June 17, 2025

      Project Abandonments Hit a Record in May

      June 13, 2025

      U.S. Construction Added 4,000 Jobs in May

      June 10, 2025

      Ariz. Construction Added 2,400 Jobs in April

      May 21, 2025

      More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

      June 18, 2025

      Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan

      June 18, 2025

      MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

      June 17, 2025

      Coconino Community College Issues $100M Bond Ballot Request

      June 17, 2025
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2025 Mid-Year Update
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    AZBEX
    Home » Planning & Development » 307KSF Rail-served Industrial Development Planned in Goodyear
    Planning & Development

    307KSF Rail-served Industrial Development Planned in Goodyear

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffDecember 12, 2023No Comments4 Mins Read
    Credit: Butler Design Group Architects/City of Goodyear
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX

    A plan for a 307.5KSF, rail-served logistics center on 36.4 acres at the NWC of Cotton Lane and MC 85 in Goodyear is the latest such consideration up for review in the West Valley.

    National developer Bet Investments, Inc. is requesting a zoning change for the project—known as Logistics 85—from the current El Cidro Planned Area Development to I-2 General Industrial Park with a PAD overlay. Under the El Cidro PAD, the property is primarily designated as General Commercial.

    According to its website, Bet Investments has projects in 11 states, including eight other properties in addition to Logistics 85. The Arizona project page lists two sites in Pinal County and six in the West Valley, including one in Tonopah.

    The site is bounded by MC 85 to the south, the Union Pacific Railroad to the north, Cotton Lane to the east and an unincorporated Arizona Department of Transportation-owned property to the east. If approved and built, Logistics 85 will offer a direct connection to UPRR.

    According to the submitted narrative, “In the El Cidro PAD, this parcel was designated C-2 General Commercial. The new requested I-2 with PAD Overlay will allow a cargo-oriented development along the Union Pacific Railroad with a reduced front setback from MC 85, a reduced rear setback along the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way, modified landscape buffers, and additional prohibitions on certain overly intensive industrial uses.”

    In describing the location’s suitability for the proposed use, the narrative says, “The subject property is uniquely situated between a Union Pacific Railway to the north and MC 85 to the south. This flat and highly developable site will have access from MC 85 and would benefit from a potential rail spur being proposed by the developer. The property is also adjacent to a short segment of Cotton Lane, which is currently the terminus of the Loop 303 until such time as an extension is warranted and built. The property’s location, access, and potential rail spur make it highly desirable for industrial and distribution type uses which are identified in the City’s I-2 zoning district.”

    The request also highlights the location’s proximity to other large-scale manufacturing and distribution operations to the north and south and points out it is separated from any “Neighborhood” uses by MC 85 and Cotton Lane. It says Logistics 85 will serve as an extension of the area’s predominant land use pattern.

    The application acknowledges that the site’s irregular shape imposes some design challenges—specifically, a 50-foot setback as the property becomes narrower to the east because of the bend in MC 85 and a reduction to 20 feet is necessary on the rear setback resulting from UPRR’s right-of-way running parallel to the northern boundary. Loading and delivery docks will have to be primarily located on the building’s south side, fronting MC 85 and opposite UPRR.

    A circular drive would be difficult because of the narrow, irregular shape, and the rail spur will have to be extended both along and parallel to the north side. To manage that, the application requests an increase in maximum public street frontage from 50% to 85% and identifies other projects in the area that have been granted similar exceptions, some of which have frontages as high as 100%.

    In reviewing the application, City planning staff found the request to be consistent with Goodyear’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and recommended approval with several stipulations, largely detailing associated infrastructure development responsibilities. The Planning and Zoning Commission agreed and recommended approval in its Dec. 6 meeting, and the request will go before Goodyear City Council on Dec. 18.

    The developer is Bet Investments, Inc. Butler Design Group is the architect. The civil engineer is Hunter Engineering, and landscape planning is by Laskin & Associates, Inc. The project is represented by Beus Gilbert McGroder PLLC.

    Arizona Department of Transportation BET Investments Butler Design Group Goodyear City Council Goodyear Planning and Zoning Commission Industrial Laskin & Associates Logistics 85 Private rail-served industrial Union Pacific Railroad UPRR warehouse/manufacturing
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

    June 18, 2025

    Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan

    June 18, 2025

    MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

    June 17, 2025

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Our Picks

    More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

    June 18, 2025

    Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan

    June 18, 2025

    MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

    June 17, 2025

    Coconino Community College Issues $100M Bond Ballot Request

    June 17, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    Legislation & Regulations

    More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

    June 18, 20250

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX The City of Chandler probably didn’t expect to be a…

    Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan

    June 18, 2025

    MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

    June 17, 2025

    Coconino Community College Issues $100M Bond Ballot Request

    June 17, 2025

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    More Cities Considering Data Center Restrictions

    June 18, 2025

    Mesa Boards Review 36-Unit Apartment Plan

    June 18, 2025

    MAG Meetings Detail Prop 479 Freeway Life Cycle Plans

    June 17, 2025
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.