What's Hot

    Developers Must Work Differently to Counter Intensifying Project Opposition

    January 6, 2026

    Political Group Pressing for Lucid Expansion Referendum

    January 6, 2026

    Gilbert Considering Other Methods to Fund Transportation Projects

    January 6, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    AZBEX
    NEWS TICKER
    • [January 6, 2026] - Developers Must Work Differently to Counter Intensifying Project Opposition
    • [January 6, 2026] - Political Group Pressing for Lucid Expansion Referendum
    • [January 6, 2026] - Gilbert Considering Other Methods to Fund Transportation Projects
    • [January 6, 2026] - Industry Professionals 01-06-26
    • [January 6, 2026] - Commercial Real Estate 01-06-26
    • [December 30, 2025] - Major Federal Defense Projects Moving Forward in Arizona
    • [December 30, 2025] - Mesa DRB Discusses 170-Acre Data Center Project Plan
    • [December 30, 2025] - ADOT Announces Major Projects for 2026
    Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
    • Home
    • News
      1. View Latest
      2. ✎ Planning & Development
      3. 📰 Local News
      4. 🔎︎ Classifieds
      5. 🕵 Editorial Analysis
      6. 💰 Budgets & Funding
      7. 🏢 Commercial Real Estate
      8. 👔 People on the Move
      9. 🌵 Arizona Projects
      10. 🏛️ Legislation & Regulations
      11. 📈 Trends

      Political Group Pressing for Lucid Expansion Referendum

      January 6, 2026

      Major Federal Defense Projects Moving Forward in Arizona

      December 30, 2025

      Mesa DRB Discusses 170-Acre Data Center Project Plan

      December 30, 2025

      Page Rejects Petition Opposing $10B Data Center

      December 23, 2025

      ADOT Announces Major Projects for 2026

      December 30, 2025

      Higher Ed Leaders Discuss Projects, Process and Plans

      December 19, 2025

      Maricopa County Approves New Data Center Rules

      December 19, 2025

      Phoenix City Officials Exploring Expansion Options for Convention Center

      December 16, 2025

      Developers Must Work Differently to Counter Intensifying Project Opposition

      January 6, 2026

      Scottsdale Hospitals War May Heat Up with New Banner Request

      July 29, 2025

      Glendale Voters to Determine VAI Resort’s Fate

      May 16, 2025

      Legislation Would Effectively Strip NIMBYs of Referendum Tool

      February 11, 2025

      Gilbert Considering Other Methods to Fund Transportation Projects

      January 6, 2026

      Public School Bonds Split at the Ballot

      November 7, 2025

      Early voting for Coconino Community College bond begins this week

      October 7, 2025

      Yuma Funding CIP Projects with $116M Bond Issuance

      September 24, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 01-06-26

      January 6, 2026

      Commercial Real Estate 12-23-25

      December 23, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 12-16-25

      December 16, 2025

      Commercial Real Estate 12-09-25

      December 9, 2025

      Industry Professionals 01-06-26

      January 6, 2026

      Industry Professionals 12-23-25

      December 23, 2025

      Industry Professionals 12-16-25

      December 16, 2025

      Industry Professionals 12-09-25

      December 9, 2025

      Arizona Projects 12-30-25

      December 30, 2025

      Arizona Projects 12-19-25

      December 19, 2025

      Arizona Projects 12-12-25

      December 12, 2025

      Arizona Projects 12-05-25

      December 5, 2025

      Major Changes Coming for Arizona Planning and Development

      December 5, 2025

      Public School Bonds Split at the Ballot

      November 7, 2025

      Ritz-Carlton Developer Declares Chapter 11 in Bid to Retain Project

      November 7, 2025

      U.S. Senate Advances Major Housing Legislation

      October 16, 2025

      Heritage Place; City of Litchfield Park/Independent Newsmedia

      December 30, 2025

      U.S. Construction Adds 28,000 Jobs in November

      December 19, 2025

      Construction Materials Prices Rose in September

      December 2, 2025

      U.S. Construction Adds 19,000 Jobs in September

      November 26, 2025

      Developers Must Work Differently to Counter Intensifying Project Opposition

      January 6, 2026

      Political Group Pressing for Lucid Expansion Referendum

      January 6, 2026

      Gilbert Considering Other Methods to Fund Transportation Projects

      January 6, 2026

      Industry Professionals 01-06-26

      January 6, 2026
    • AZBEX
      • Subscribe
      • Solicitations
      • Classifieds
      • Advertising
    • DATABEX
      • DATABEX Log-In
      • Webinars
      • Monthly Snapshot
    • Events
      • 2026 Construction Activity Forecast
    • About Us
      • Meet the Company
      • Meet the Sales Team
      • Meet the Editorial Team
      • Meet the BEXperts
    • CIP Special Report
    AZBEX
    Home»Budgets & Funding»Ducey Proposes to Reverse K12 Funding Cuts
    Budgets & Funding

    Ducey Proposes to Reverse K12 Funding Cuts

    BEX StaffBy BEX StaffJanuary 15, 2018No Comments4 Mins Read
    Credit: Tom Tingle/The Arizona Republic
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    By Ricardo Cano for The Arizona Republic

    Gov. Doug Ducey on Tuesday announced a plan he says would “reverse Recession-era cuts” to Arizona school funding and help settle a $1B lawsuit over a decade of cuts to school capital funding.

    Surrounded by more than 50 Arizona school superintendents, Ducey said his budget this year will include $100M in “permanent” and “flexible” school capital funding. He promised to continue to increase that capital funding until it reaches $371M by 2023.

    The plan would be to distribute that money to schools via the so-called District and Charter Additional Assistance funding, which goes toward expenses such as school building construction and renovation, textbooks, technology and school buses.

    Ducey said his 2019 budget proposal, which is expected to be formally released Friday, would also provide $300M in additional funding for other areas of K-12. That includes required additional funding for student growth and inflation.

    Ducey did not specify how he will pay for the plan beyond saying that “those dollars are coming from the growing general fund as our economy is growing.”

    Updated numbers are expected from economists and state officials next week, but an October state Finance Advisory Committee report projected the state would have a cash shortfall of $24M at the end of the current fiscal year and a shortfall of $80M next fiscal year.

    The committee projected a shortfall in the structural balance — the difference between ongoing revenue and ongoing spending — of $19M next fiscal year.

    Other Funding Promises

    Ducey detailed how he proposes to distribute the other $300M he’s promised schools next year. It includes:

    • $116M for student growth and inflation, which is required under state law.
    • An additional $35.2M, on top of the $17M baseline, to the state’s School Facilities Board for building renewal grants sought by schools to improve or repair aging facilities.
    • $2M to fully fund large Joint Technical Education Districts. Students attending these high schools currently aren’t funded by the state for all four years.
    • $34M for the second year of a promised teacher salary increase.

    Settling Lawsuits

    The governor touted his plan as the “next step beyond Proposition 123,” the ballot measure that resolved a separate $1.6B lawsuit over school inflation funding.

    “How do you settle lawsuits? You settle lawsuits with dollars,” Ducey said. “We’re bringing dollars into the equation. This lawsuit can be settled – we’re demonstrating a five-year, forward-looking commitment.”

    Ducey was referring to a 2017 lawsuit alleging the state has not adequately funded infrastructure expenses for things like building maintenance, school buses and technology.

    School officials involved in that lawsuit said they do not view Ducey’s plan as a formal offer to settle that lawsuit. Rather, they characterized the plan as “an act of good faith.”

    “It’s going to take longer than a year to resolve (the lawsuit),” said Chris Kotterman, lobbyist for the Arizona School Boards Association. “But at the same time, we’re not going to put our nose up at formula money that should be going to the schools.”

    School administrators at the Tuesday announcement at the Arizona Capitol cheered the governor’s plan and said it addresses a desperate need for capital funding.

    Many of them, including the superintendents of two of the state’s largest school districts – Mesa and Chandler – expressed an urgent need for more money to address long-term capital needs such as building repairs, textbooks and new buses.

    Still Less Than in 2008

    Save Our Schools Arizona last week held several events calling for the state to invest more money in public education. Its members specifically noted the $1B shortfall in school funding since the recession and have used that figure as their barometer for adequately funding schools.

    Dawn Penich-Thacker, spokeswoman for Save Our Schools, said any budget that includes less than that amount for schools is “not new money – it is simply paying back a portion of what was taken out of the budget a decade ago.”

    Read more at The Arizona Republic.

    EDITOR’S NOTE: It appears Gov. Ducey’s proposal has placated at least some factions. According to a Jan. 10 report in The Arizona Capitol Times, The Arizona Association of School Business, a group of education officials, has voted to withdraw as a plaintiff in the funding lawsuit. The article quoted a statement in which the group’s board said the governor’s proposal, if approved, “brings immediate relief to our school districts versus waiting for the outcome of the lawsuit.” Several other plaintiffs remain in the lawsuit, however.

    Arizona School Boards Association Doug Ducey K12 Save Our Schools School facilities board school funding
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Gilbert Considering Other Methods to Fund Transportation Projects

    January 6, 2026

    ADOT Announces Major Projects for 2026

    December 30, 2025

    Higher Ed Leaders Discuss Projects, Process and Plans

    December 19, 2025

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Our Picks

    Developers Must Work Differently to Counter Intensifying Project Opposition

    January 6, 2026

    Political Group Pressing for Lucid Expansion Referendum

    January 6, 2026

    Gilbert Considering Other Methods to Fund Transportation Projects

    January 6, 2026

    Industry Professionals 01-06-26

    January 6, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    Don't Miss
    BEX

    Developers Must Work Differently to Counter Intensifying Project Opposition

    January 6, 20260

    By Roland Murphy for AZBEX Many times, the first issue of a new year will…

    Political Group Pressing for Lucid Expansion Referendum

    January 6, 2026

    Gilbert Considering Other Methods to Fund Transportation Projects

    January 6, 2026

    Industry Professionals 01-06-26

    January 6, 2026

    BEX serves architecture, engineering and construction firms as well as all the ancillary product and service categories that market to them. These include manufacturing representatives, public agencies and private real estate organizations, specialty subcontractors and services providers related to our industry.

    Our Picks

    Developers Must Work Differently to Counter Intensifying Project Opposition

    January 6, 2026

    Political Group Pressing for Lucid Expansion Referendum

    January 6, 2026

    Gilbert Considering Other Methods to Fund Transportation Projects

    January 6, 2026
    Contact Us

    Phone: 480-709-4190
    Address: P.O. Box 12196 Tempe, AZ 85284
    Email: sales@azbex.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.